WHAT IS THE TRUTH OF 911 TRUTH?

-A MESSAGE FROM THE COORDINATOR, 911 GRASSROOTS ORGANIZATION-

This is in fact the second of a series of articles I intend to post, perhaps every two weeks or so, on our web site, www.911grassroots.org. My purpose in doing so will be to help re-integrate, re-invigorate and expand our 911 Truth grassroots network, so that we can work all together as a powerful catalyst for exposing the secretive de facto “shadow government” which I believe is proven beyond a doubt to have perpetrated the atrocities of 9/11/01, in order to hasten its demise as a malignant and controlling force.

A question we must grapple with in presenting ourselves and furthering our mission is: What is the “truth” that we “9/11 Truthers” are intent on establishing? How do we perceive the complex crime we are seeking to expose? Some among us have said (too benignly, in my opinion), simply that there legitimately remain “unanswered questions” as to what really happened on 9/11. Some such people allege that, while the official version has been, or can be shown, to be woefully inaccurate, scientifically implausible, and/or contradictory, we simply don’t know what did happen, absent a “real investigation”. To my mind, a real investigation has been undertaken, with very compelling and credible results, by our own 9/11 Truth investigators, impressively credentialed in a number of fields and proven highly capable of uncovering and rightly discerning and reading the massive amount of now-available evidence.

The researches of our slew of investigators, which I along with numerous others, have reviewed in volume for a number of years, have impelled me to reach the following tentative conclusions:

1) An amorphous organization known as al Qaeda seems to have been involved in peripheral aspects of the much larger operation. But, al Qaeda was (is) a creature of the CIA and companion intelligence agencies, and I have seen no credible evidence that, as such, it has escaped or superseded U.S. “security” forces control. Its status I take as an operative and tool of U.S. intel.
2) The “air show” at the World Trade Center was simply that – mounted as a distraction and an illusion of a foreign terrorist act.
3) More than likely, the aircraft involved were remotely and electronically controlled, because such was technically doable and manned control far less reliable in terms of successfully colliding with the buildings, etc. While the government agencies concerned remain adamant as to the identity of 19 hijackers listed from the beginning, alleged forensic identifications of some seem dubious and less than unequivocal. The lack of a conceivable purpose for placing passengers aboard any of the involved aircraft leads me to doubt that there actually were any. Suspiciously in itself, none of the boarding gate footage has been made available for public verification, to my knowledge.
4) Speculatively, an original hijacking plot may have come from al Qaeda operatives and been enhanced, being judged as ineffectual alone by the “security” service planners , whose analyses found that neither aircraft employed as missiles nor their pyrotechnic effects could have brought down the targeted buildings, but decided that the original air show should be retained as decoy and cover. The Arab flight school attendees’ likely role was as decoys and patsies, never actually boarding any airliners on September 11. (Who really were aboard those controversial flights said to be carrying Saudi royal family members out of the country after 9/11, anyway?)
5) Evidence abounds that it was expertly-prepared and conducted controlled demolition that resulted in the virtual pulverization and virtual free-fall speed straight down collapse of three WTC skyscrapers, one of which was not touched by any aircraft, on 9/11. There are a number of evidentiary paths leading inexorably to this conclusion, not the least of which features the abundant molecular presence of nanothermite, a super-powerful, hyper-thermic blasting agent with no other purpose, produced solely in one known U.S. military lab, found in all four known controlled dust samples from Ground Zero. It would seem that it only remains for an impartial judicial system to establish that a) the material recovered really is said nanothermite, b) only officially-authorized persons (I think safe to say, not al Qaeda) could have gotten prior access to the material, and c) only authorized persons could have gotten adequate prior access to the buildings’ interiors to expertly implant and prepare the blasting materials and set-up. The photo and engineering evidence also very compellingly indicates controlled demolition. Other means, indeed, might have been employed; but then, how would one explain the presence of all of that sole-purpose nanothermite?
6) Strong evidence in hand similarly leads to more-or-less probable scenarios disfavoring the official narrative for the Pentagon strike and the activity producing a “crash site” and debris in Pennsylvania.
7) The cover-up, in so far as it’s been sufficiently effective up to now, has employed a great deal of deeply-psychological knowledge and advertising moxie, to shape highly questionable and, in many cases, clearly fabricated evidence into a scenario the general public has accepted because its perceived interests were served and it was conditioned in advance to defer.
8) The most egregious crime of all has been the replacement of normal political and naturally-occurring processes and events producing the social and economic benefits of civil society, with a giant-scale Hollywood-style production choreographed by powerful interests. Such powerful forces (in effect, a “shadow government”) have achieved domination over constitutional government and purported free society for cynical and selfish purposes benefitting a few, increasingly enslaving the rest.
9) By systematically informing our compatriots of the evidence and meaning of 9/11 and working to compel due process regarding the same, we who have discovered the truth of our government’s and establishment’s deceit and culpability re 9/11 can awaken society to the reality of subversion overtaking it. Because healing, we know, cannot take place over an infection.

Anyway, that’s a rough outline of my current take on 9/11, though I’m in no way wedded to any of the main conclusions as stated, and realize there are thousands of supportive and background details to uncover and determine, some perhaps beyond precise determination at this point. Please share your thinking, too, and I’ll try to post lucid and suitably brief responses. Email same (and any other communications) to 911grassroots@gmail.com. And please check in about two weeks for a new post, at http://www.911grassroots.org/.

James Hufferd
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization (911TGO)