Monday, May 2, 2011

Clearing the Deck - Half-Price Sale of the Century

CLEARING THE DOCKET – HALF-PRICE SALE OF THE CENTURY
by James Hufferd
     Certainly one of the most tragic and profound features of the wholesale assumption of control of the overall world scene over the past number of years by a shadow government has been the replacement of news and a general awareness of what was happening with a choreographed Hollywood-style  faux-news narrative of events – some involving outright invention and apparent down-the-line scripting – suiting purposes dictated by a vanisingly small handful of controllers. Thus, this week’s mega-event – the announced fire-fight head-shot to Osama bin Laden – has to be, at the very least, widely questioned.
     If it did really happen as announced, then, as duly noted, that would be incredible on several counts. First, it is amazing that a man with advanced liver disease putting him in and out of hospitals for dialysis already ten years ago , would have survived actively for a decade in the remote mountains of the Af-Pak border, a living remnant of life a thousand years ago. That region, we were repeatedly reminded by way of excuse, was, after all, so remote than twenty-first century logistics and transport could scarcely even manage to get anyone there to attempt a hit. It was dangerous to put soldiers into harm’s way, we were told. (But, eventually, we will get him).
     Second, what of the stories we have heard of his hideout being surrounded and he and his entourage being permitted to walk out? What of all the apparently-faked videotaped messages, with rings on his finger, a different nose each time, different-handedness, and a steadily-darkening beard? Could David Ray Griffin been fooled into thinking that wasn’t really bin Laden?
     (Of course, it could have been a stand-in the whole time, while the real one stayed hidden, playing chess and plotting chaos). Was Osama at the end still a CIA operative, who was quietly turned on and gotten rid of? It wouldn’t be the first time. Company loyalty is legend.
     And what are we to make of the big apparent shifts in the larger regional context of this event in recent months? What of the U.S.-backed revolutions against traditional U.S. allies in Tunisia, Egypt, and elsewhere? Why did the U.S. overtly intervene only in Libya, hardly one of the Arab world’s main addresses? My hunch is that U.S. security forces lit the match, at least in Egypt (naturally enough, mimicking Tunisia). After thus re-deploying, they (U.S. overlords) couldn’t risk the powerful adverse propaganda that could come from the old guard (Qaddafi, in that case) holding on against a weak rebel force and snapping the chain of dramatic “democratic” triumphs dramatically sweeping the landscape. The new way to “democracy” and new-style puppet regimes, replacing the dominant brand’s by-now old-hat (failed) imposition by the U.S.  armed forces, guns blazing, was to be from the troublesome “Arab street” upward, coopting the masses. The latter would have no more presence in actual governing, but perhaps could be fooled into contentment, thinking they did. Sound familiar?
     And U.S. policy-makers, in their wisdom, just last week reshuffled the leadership team to fit the shift. And they wisely timed yesterday’s fire-fight so as not to step all over their great Imperial ally, Britain’s, mega Imperial event on the weekend. Perfect choreographing! Perfect! The people are cheering!
     And so, out with the old! The decade of vigilante, lawless blood revenge on Osama, al Qaeda (and all bad and suspect anti-Israeli oppression Muslims) was beginning to cloy, the results having been horrendous for American prestige and treasure. High time to liquidate any old skeletons still rattling someplace far in the background (according to the still ongoing official 9/11 narrative) and cash it or them in for whatever propaganda value might still be in the offing, and gently hint that everyone to close the coffin.
     None of which has anything whatsoever to say about nanothermite, the un-repealed laws of physics, or de facto stand-down orders.
     So, are those the outlines of the real story? I don’t know.

0 comments:

Post a Comment