ENVISIONING HOW WE WIN

Envisioning How We Win

by James Hufferd

Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

          Our common objective must be the outing and exposure  to the normal workings of the law of those who were responsible for the crimes of 9/11/01, the object of our concern for a decade and the most egregious concentrated negative acts in America at least since the Civil War. On that much, I believe that we in the 911 Truth movement can readily agree. In my last article/column, I demonstrated that there remains considerable disagreement among 911 Truthers (a proud designation for us in my view) as to just who might be ultimately responsible. But, we do have several key pieces of the puzzle in hand – thanks to a great deal of outstanding forensic work and research by specialized fellow Truthers , to the point that we can say, along with David Ray Griffin, “Give me $40 million (the price tag of the Lewinsky investigation) and subpoena power, and in a month, I can tell you for sure who did 9/11 and how they did it.”

     So, why do the government at all levels and the media not want the truth to emerge, via the standard means? Why the air-tight, endless cover-up and denial of every conceivable explanation, except the fairy tale they sold to us, that it was Osama and the 19 Muslims/Arabs who planned and pulled off the whole, complex thing? Why not admit all the evidence and eye-witnesses who have surfaced since the first day, when their attribution was made  – including those deliberately blocked from exposure and testifying – and let forensic experts, prosecutors, and ordinary juries sort it out, just as would be permitted and encouraged with any run-of-the-mill convenience  store robbery, gangland slaying, or funds embezzlement? Why do the designated minions and tribunes of justice in America so oppose the Constitutionally-guaranteed workings of justice in this one case in particular?  (Of course, it’s not the first time for this sort of pronounced unorthodox funny stuff on the part of officialdom and the power establishment: There was JFK and OKC – both cut and dry in their telling – and  there were all the other classic-pattern assassinations, going all the way back to Garfield, McKinley,  and the quickly hush-hushed FDR attempt of 1932,  each involving a lone conspicuously foreign-born or extremist foreign-sympathizing perpetrator, when the forensics didn’t corroborate the story sold to the public.) And so, the question remains: Why the same iron-clad cover-up and shaky up-front story and denial of evidence – always?

     The cover-up is designed and maintained to protect from legal jeopardy prominent or obscure members of the establishment or officialdom, to be sure – just as we have said all along. But also, to obscure the steadily emerging circumstance that the “news” reported is generally not really news anymore, but a colossal planned, scripted, and managed 24/7/365 reality show filled with innuendos and patent lies, partial-falsehoods, and events recounted in lurid detail that never really happened, reported as such to sway and condition the public to demand or accept what a small super-council “shadow government” wants to have happen or do. And the consequences, as we directly experience daily, are increasingly dire for the public, both domestic and world-wide. If they permitted the truth of 9/11 to emerge now, it is feared (not without reason), public confidence in the reality of information we are fed would end, and social anarchy and public schizophrenia would follow.

     But, would they? Given the irrational things many people believe, without any credible evidence , I would expect a third or more to still cling to the official version of 9/11  for decades – come what may.  But I would expect many of the others to hail the triumph of justice – however belated – and strive to pick up the pieces and insist on reforms. And that’s just what we want!  Another thing to consider is that a growing segment of the public already know, or strongly suspect, that we are being fed a steady diet of falsehoods and lies, so that the truth about 9/11 – already suspected by many who are not letting on at least yet – would not come as a very great surprise.

     A third compelling reason why the whole establishment is working together to suppress 9/11 truth could be to shield Israel, the first or second home of so many in the U.S. government and establishment, from repudiation and reprisal, should the evidence, once vetted, point to a major Israeli role in the defining crimes of our corrupt era. Let us hope that such blaming, if it were to turn out that way, would turn to our own leaders, as those responsible for permitting foreign ops on our soil, first.

     But the fact that we are making progress by keeping our contention that the “official version” is malignant boloney out there is manifest. No one else is pushing that message these days, so its increasing presence and resonance must be our doing. Let’s keep it up until a critical threshold of credibility is reached and the cracks in the wall of stories sold the public become clearly visible to all.  (“What a tangled web we weave . . . “) Truth is, indeed, the most powerful of weapons, and we will win out ultimately.

     So, let’s don’t stop thinking about tomorrow.

Jlh/6/24/11