ANGER, BEWILDERMENT, AND FOCUS

Anger, bewilderment, and focus
by James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization
Who are this vanishingly-rare breed, the 911 Truth activists? Is there a profile that most of us would tend to fit? Well, yes. For one thing, we can pride ourselves by now on being among the most stubborn, dead-set people on this blue orb in space. Equivalent, perhaps, to Flat-Earthers, but with one important distinction. While the former retain their conviction contrary to all conflicting evidence, we embrace all credible evidence as sacrosanct and reject every cockamamie conclusion that does not comport with every shred of evidence available.
We steadfastly refuse to go with the flow, when the mighty flow of supposition or belief concerning 9/11 is generated and supported by misinformation and disinformation, no matter the source.
Beyond being shamelessly stubborn and remaining steadfast to widely-lampooned, discredited, and reviled conclusions and beliefs (that happen to fit the known facts), we also tend to be fueled and maintained in our stance by white-hot anger that we don’t allow to die. We are, almost necessarily, large-minded enough to realize that our more-or-less incendiary views concerning what amounts to the largest known government or establishment action mounted detrimentally against the people of this country and our cohorts abroad carries extremely important potential consequences.
And those potential consequences – that the apparent political modus operandi of the American (corporate + government) establishment from one day to the next would have to be substantially modified if the establishment’s sometimes-deadly adversary relationship with the people were thus proven to be actual and operative. The people manifestly wouldn’t put up with a murderous regime or its private sector accessories, nor with its successors if judged guilty of deliberately covering up for it, were a predominate number of people so convinced. There would be hell to pay, or at least, justice to be served, before we could again move forward.
And so, can we, the few, the proud, the evidentially-motivated, prove to our most-reluctant fellows’ satisfaction that our roundly-reviled evidence-produced view is, after all, substantially correct? That is, that we’ve been dealt a monstrous and mass-murderous false-flag operation, and then been baldly and consistently lied to about it, resulting in additional millions needlessly killed and maimed, both physically and psychologically, and the forfeiture of our vaunted civil liberties? Can we make our case first, to our fellows, so that they with us will irresistibly demand due process and justice, albeit delayed?
Can our own heartfelt burning anger and resentment against charlatans and sociopaths who have so cruelly misled and betrayed us actually lead to a breakthrough, surpassing a sufficient fateful milestone of informed awareness among ourselves and our fellow citizens?
While justifiably angry, we are befuddled by the amount of forensic evidence and willing testimony that has been blocked and withheld apparently for the purpose of protecting the guilty. Still, I believe that our preparing the ground, keeping the issue alive with our almost still, small voice of the gigantic evidence that we do have, will in the end triumph, because valuable new insider testimony and new insights are still leaking out, drip by drab, day after day.
To wit: the testimony of Susan Lindauer, long-bridled government insider, in her book Extreme Prejudice, and related speeches and interviews, may contain a lot of conjecture. But, it also contains a few, vital seeds of genuine, previously-unavailable information. Another example is a just-released interview with a former Navy Seal named Bill Wood, who recounts his several-years involvement with a program experimenting with flying remotely-guided Tomahawk missiles, strikingly similar in size and general appearance to a variety of commercial airliners, into buildings. http://projectcamelotproductions.com/interviews/bill_wood/bill_wood.html Check beginning at about the 1:17 mark. Hence, his credible conclusion that he in fact unknowingly participated in a series of dress rehearsals for what really happened at the WTC on 9/11/01.
If we do our work of delivering such uncanny evidence and indications from highly-credible witnesses, still continuing to proliferate, to even a reluctant general public, we can turn around the conventional wisdom on this vital issue in the same way our historic predecessors did on vital matters in their day.
And then mark my words, the politicians will rush to serve us – to protect their own credibility and tenure. That is, the truth will become cool.
JH / 1/27/12