By James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization
Don’t blame yourself if you’re confused relative to what to believe about this and that odd and potentially or generically suspicious happening or suspected conspiracy happening rapid-fire these days. It’s genuinely impossible to know for sure whether some events in question just occurred on their own or as a put-up by the dark side of the government/corporate establishment. And in the realm of personal views as well as in law, conviction can still properly only be linked to conclusive evidence, no matter what one’s ideological views or thought tendencies.
Personally, I try not to be swept away or won over too easily. I believe in absolute equality before the law. I favor a government essentially transparent, as equally as possible representing in balance the interests of every citizen, rich or poor, and strong and adept enough to meaningfully forward, and never impede, those widespread interests. Does adherence to such tenets make me a liberal? According to my understanding, yes, it does. Not “right wing” or “extremist”. Are my precepts realistic? Today, not so much; tomorrow, hopefully. I have none to replace them with in the meantime.
As a confirmed proponent of 9/11 Truth, I aspire to rely always and only on what I regard as convincing evidence of whatever, not on an outlook that tells me, in effect, “they always do it, and so they (U.S. government or establishment, NWO, select ethnicities or foreigners) must have done this, too.” No! Without the evidence to convince me, forget it. Show me the court-worthy evidence.
And I emphatically don’t want to be lumped in with those whose convictions involve bigotry, what I’ll call “cc’s” (compulsive conspiratorialists), anarchists (believers in little or no rightful government), violent revolutionaries, weak-minded deranged or disturbed persons, or dysfunctional or on purpose-disabled non-thinkers. Do you? And all along, the establishment media has been busy attaching those of our persuasion on the matter of 9/11 in the popular mind to precisely those unlovely and ultimately self-centered and loathed pariah communities lurking in today’s America.
But as toxic and bitter-tasting as the rest of the foregoing might well be, the most dangerous and challenging and doubtless by multiples the largest are the latter – the non-thinkers (or, more precisely, the never-thinkers).
It isn’t that they can’t think; it’s that they’re deliberately programmed so they don’t have to. Everyone is programmed. Our minds function as computers and any purposeful activity our minds incline or compel us to or toward is determined by their content, no matter the identity of the programmers or sources thereof – whether friendly media figures, religious authorities, government, books or movies, politicians of preference, family members, or etc., etc. If you exercise reasonable discernment or defensible rationality, or even direct the input that constitutes your mind’s content conscientiously for yourself, you are more self-programmed than are most people.
And, if that is so, you can buck the strong currents of “information” that endeavor to control the mass patterns of thought across the culture. As such, you are uniquely equipped to do habitually in your daily life what jurors are ideally instructed to do – impartially regard and process clear evidence in order to reach a definite and defensible conclusion. What we need to realize as spokespersons for the evidence of the truth of 9/11 is that, though many will tend to or say they agree with our evidence and arguments, few will be free enough in reality from control by extraneous sources of influence to reach and hold and act upon a conviction opposed to the general strong current of purposely fabricated imposed thought programmed in.
We need to realize as well that most people don’t habitually think about most things at all – including, rather obviously, events they haven’t really thought about in years. And most people who actually do think relatively freely on a bigger scale already agree with us.
Simultaneously (and seemingly paradoxically), even highly-educated and normally persuasive people – and perhaps especially they – are programmed (or trained) to believe on faith, reflexively, and probably irrevocably in most cases, precisely whatever they are told. To reverse the incentivized programmed-in counter-thinking of at least some of such persons whose aptitude would equip them to logically convince and turn the tide with countless others, we need to develop an effective strategy that will penetrate or reverse critical aspects of their programming.
For this, we need the psychologists in our ranks who have explained to us why people in general resist our message and simple common reasoning and evidence to consciously try to develop such an effective strategy to reach and turn around the thinking – using evidence, logic, and whatever else – of people both on a one-by-one basis and en masse. Anyone who’s seen the epic AE911Truth film knows we have such psychologists in our community. Look at it this way: if the people of the world have been placed in the perilous fatefully beholden position we find ourselves in largely through the operation of ill-intentioned minds, it stands to reason that beneficially-intentioned minds could reverse the processes employed against us. Now, let our psychologists stand up and shoulder the tasks of producing a psychologically effective concise or nuanced strategy and training the rest of us to effectuate it. Because, everyone is programmed, and we need to counter the absurd message implanted on and since 9/11/01 across enough of the culture to start a wave.
We win with our brainpower, not our flapping jaws – we tried that.