Individuals willing to be contacted for information and/or leading groups of activists striving for truth around the crimes of 9-11-2001. To request your name be added to this list, or to change or remove your information, please utilize the Contact form linked at the righthand column.

Thursday, December 17, 2015


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization


For a lot of us who were somehow open-minded enough to objectively consider and weigh the available evidence regarding what happened on September 11, 2001, the realization that the government’s and controlled media’s narrative was just a deceptive story covering up the truth was only the start of a series of unsettling realizations.

Although I sensed immediately that the story had to be bogus because its details and certainties came out far too quickly to be real, long before any kind of investigation could possibly have taken place, I didn’t consider acting on my realization – not realizing that you even could – until a full six long years later. And at the time I, a shy person, found the gumption to try to organize a local meeting to talk about the event, or event syndrome, in late summer, 2007, after speaking with Janice Matthews, the then top 911 Truth organizer, the cutting-edge bold concept in the young movement was what would soon be called “LIHOP” – that they Let It Happen On Purpose, one of two designations popularized by investigator/author Webster Tarpley.

Janice encouraged me to try to hold the local meeting I was contemplating, in thinking that my state ought to have a chapter of 911 Truth, and suggested showing at the organizational meeting “Press For Truth”, a documentary presenting the travails of the so-called “Jersey Girls” in struggling to get the government to mount an official investigation of 9/11, the largest crime, or crime spree as it were, in U.S. history – an investigation ultimately authorized, grossly underfunded, and managed from the get-go, turning it into part of the cover-up.

And after all of that real hijacking and fraud, the most incisive theory the Jersey Girls could put forth in their much-vaunted film was LIHOP – that the government must have just let the named hijackers do the deed on purpose. To think even that much was considered unspeakably, unthinkably radical at the time – the province of loons and owls. Because, the myth that was spun and pushed and pushed and pushed and pushed upon the world involving nineteen evil and devout Muslim hijackers, so-called “box-cutters”, and a bearded devil in a cave – was, incomprehensibly it seems now, that strong. The government, for its own nefarious reasons, some on the far margins dared allege, had let them get away with it. And so the accusation from the farthest margin stood, six years in, almost at the end of G.W. Bush’s dismal presidency!

Still, the people at large, the bejeebers scared out of them on purpose, seemingly hadn’t a clue, the most conservative 90%, it seemed, conflating those who had an aberrant theory with “the hijackers” and ready to clobber anyone contradicting the official myth.

Not long afterward, nano-thermite was found (and properly verified) in abundance in all the examined dust samples from Ground Zero and the prevailing 911 Truth theory, in light of the fact that outsiders couldn’t have accessed or planted it, shifted to Tarpley’s other proffered designation, “MIHOP” = Made It Happen On Purpose.

And then, slowly, a plethora of additional very suspicious “lesser” false-flag events started to occur, with ever-increasing frequency. And a new prevalent conceptualization, what I will call “Contextualism”, stating that not only was 9/11 a one-day coordinated cluster of governance-ordered false-flag events, but was just the largest among a proliferating many, fairly obviously all the products of an active in-house cottage industry to dream up, design, and regularly deliver psychological operations to produce pre-determined mind-sets and reactions from both the regular populace and the international apparatchik going forward.

So, how do we get regular people (the subject class) at least, to tumble as to what’s going on with all of these frequent shock attacks and protest loudly and ceaselessly until they stop and all of our civil institutions have to be restored to us in order to forestall a civilizational unraveling or breakdown? To use one more analogy, we spread the word to our utmost ability, work to fuel the growing level of suspicions mounting slowly against world-wide governance and growing institutional repression to work like a gigantic rock slammed into the middle of a pond, sending waves rushing concentrically outward to crash against the shores of complacency. And we never cease our efforts, hurling down rock after rock after rock, after rock, until THEY stop and we win and world civilization is allowed to recover Peace on Earth.

JH: 12/17/15

Monday, December 14, 2015

Friday, December 11, 2015

Dr. Gary Kohls - More SB false-flag evidence

More evidence that the San Bernadino event was a false flag (Eye witness said that the perps were three, well-built, white commandos.


Gary Kohls

Why are people confused about the California shooting story? (Here's why...)

Eyewitness Sally Abdelmageed told CNN:
"[it was] three men, dressed in all black, military attire with vests on holding assault rifles... I couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on and uh, from my view all I could see was a black hat and long sleeve shirt… black cargo pants with zippers on the sides, big puffy pockets, he had a huge assault rifle and extra ammo… I just saw three dressed exactly the same…. their skin tone looked white. They looked like they were athletic build. They appeared to be tall."

Security expert Michael McCann, former chief of security for the United Nations, told CBS2, "there are three people; they were well prepared; they were well equipped with the guns they were carrying; what they were wearing... they fled very quickly... I would think this was well organized and well planned beforehand."

Yet four hours later, the police shot: two brown-skinned Pakistanis, one according to the family lawyer David Chesley, was a small 90 pound woman with a young baby at home ( They were California residents in a rented black SUV with Utah plates.

The officers did not see them until they were dead. They had gone to the couple's home due to a tip (they went to other houses as well), where they saw a black SUV drive by them, slowly at first, like bait, before speeding away. They chased after the SUV. They also grabbed a third suspect running away on foot, but later released him. Left behind at the crime scene, a remote-controlled car that didn't explode.

Farook attended the same holiday party last year. Since then, his coworkers threw a baby shower for him that included a registry. His brother, who lived nearby, was in the Navy and earned two medals for his service in "The Global War on Terrorism." His brother said the couple wasn't radical.

At the party this time, Farook was sitting at a table chatting with a friend and co-worker before "disappearing" -- with his coat still on his chair. They now say there was no argument.

When shot in the mysterious SUV, his tiny wife was wearing fitted shorts above her knees and no head covering. Family says she was always fully covered when she went out. I do not post pictures of dead bodies but it is available online. The pictures show they were handcuffed in the car , why would u need to handcuff dead people, or we're they already handcuffed and places in the car?, by the actual killers.

They are portrayed as Bonnie and Clyde with a young baby. They had a fully stocked fridge with cooked food in Tupperware and pictures of their baby all over the house. Arranged flowers on tables and freshly watered house plants. Baby was left with her grandmother for Tashfeen to make a doctor appointment. They had both been sick, assuming it was a stomach flu, but she needed a doctor.

That's why, at this point, it doesn't make sense. A young mom left her baby to go kill the same people who hosted her baby shower. She allegedly made a FB post pledging allegiance to ISIS on an alias page, at 11 am. The shooting started at 11 am. The post was removed. CNN states, "Malik made the post on an account with a different name, one U.S. official said. The officials did not explain how they knew Malik was behind the message."

Who were the victims? Just like the Paris attacks, they were very diverse. The NY Times writes, "He [shared] a cubicle with a friend, Isaac Amianos, a 60-year-old father of three from Eritrea... the two of them spoke Arabic together (Farook learning from Amianos)... The health inspectors came from all over the world... Nwadike was from Nigeria. Others hailed from Vietnam, Iran, Mexico and Colombia... Bullets struck Amianos, Thalasinos and others at Farook's table." (People he was just speaking with.) "A Muslim woman he prayed with.... Anies Kondoker, 42, was shot three times but survived." Amianos' family member, who also knew Farook, claimed the two had been friends and often left the office together.

Why would a traditional Pakistani Muslim American target these people, his friends, teachers, elders, a fellow Muslim? In California of all places, with all of its other potential targets?

About the "argument" with a co-worker: "Two weeks earlier, [Thalasinos, a Messianic Jew who made anti-Islam FB posts] and Farook argued over whether Islam was a violent religion. Recounting the conversation to a friend, Thalasinos said that Farook insisted his God was peaceful... Thalasinos liked discussing such topics. There was no indication that their interaction was anything out of the ordinary."

"[Thalasinos' wife] said she believes her husband died a martyr because of his faith but he never indicated that Syed had radicalized. She said she did not believe her husband was individually targeted. 'They all got along really well. So it's shocking,' she said."

The shooters left before police arrived. Police and media then said they were searching for 3 white males. Then police shot these two, who fit no stated description, around 3 pm, after receiving a tip. The story changed from 3 male shooters to a married couple. According to multiple reports during the car chase, officers fired 380 rounds, and the suspects shot 76 rifle rounds. By the end 1-2 officers had minor injuries.

We read from the LA Times how the quiet housewife shot the 76 rifle rounds: "At one point as the couple attempted to elude police, Malik fired an assault rifle out the back window of their sport utility vehicle at pursuing officers." (

Yet multiple news sources including CNN reported, "Farook fired at officers while Malik drove, officials said." Perhaps part of the problem seeing them was the SUV's windows were completely blacked out, and 21 officers were shooting 380 rounds in a cloud of bullets from all directions.

The ammo, pipe bombs, etc., were found in their townhouse's garage. The garage was in a building separate from their home. A few minor items in the house. And a manhole in their closet ceiling.

And no one who knew them, including their many siblings and mother who lived with them and Navy brother who lived close by, saw anything strange. Neighbor said they were happy. Smiled at her. Farook would sometimes leave the garage door open as he worked on his car. Two of his friends said the same. He was always working on cars. Annie Larson, their back door neighbor last saw them hanging out on their patio on Sunday with their daughter, enjoying family time. (

Journalists entered their house, within 48 hrs, to rummage through their belongings. An unprecedented event. Any more evidence for or against this deceased couple, now unusable.

*I have had to update this so many times because of journalists changing their information. Misidentifications. Incorrect facts. Assumptions. Overly generalized statements.

Whether this whole scenario is genuine or skewed, I believe it's clear that the integrity of our informational media has plummeted. Far too often, facts are not checked in their rush to be the first to publish new information.

Friday, December 4, 2015


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization


My commentary, you have no doubt noticed, has been a bit shrill of late. Some would say it has exhibited paranoia, perhaps even unhinged-ness. Which I could deny, but who would sympathize? I can, though, counter by pointing out that, even if I were or am paranoid, that doesn’t mean the immense and completely uncontrolled danger I strive to warn of isn’t real. I have tried to document it by posting evidence from a number of credible sources that it is so – that we’re in fact being carpet-bombed with purposeful dire and wrongheaded pure disinformation and propaganda daily to a new and beyond frightful extent.

I have accordingly posted my own considered analyses of late, based on the kind of evidence recited, directly here on my own web site and under my own name. And, for whatever reason, your discernable reaction has been tepid, to say the least. I have appealed to you to “spread the word”. I have tried not to exaggerate what the evidence from stellar shared sources indicates about what is really behind the quickening and ever-sharpening disturbances the omnipresent media misreports and routinely misrepresents for effect. And, while many of my prior articles have been downloaded and sent onward each hundreds of times, these recent ones, pointing out and in some cases detailing the establishment campaign of disinformation and how we’re being worked for the objectives of an √©lite few, have hardly been shared at all.

In consequence, my questions abound: Could there be some level of disbelief even my readers can’t countenance? Are other sites, in their (your) estimation, doing a better job of laying it all out? Isn’t it clear to you that 9/11, the theme of this web site, was first and foremost the hinge event propelling the world into the bizarre and perhaps fatal era of top-down storyline invention and control – a sort of H.G. Wells “War of the Worlds” times ten, 24/7/365? You want me not to go there anymore? Or am I just being oversensitive? I have no idea. But the numbers on my web site dashboard don’t lie. If you could explain to me the tepidness of you readers’ recent response, in comments or direct messages, I would be grateful.

In the meantime, I can only assure you that I meant every word.

JH: 12/4/15