Individuals willing to be contacted for information and/or leading groups of activists striving for truth around the crimes of 9-11-2001. To request your name be added to this list, or to change or remove your information, please utilize the Contact form linked at the righthand column.

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Washington Blog -- Why War Now Appears Imminent

The long-running supreme cause of our time needs to be to remove the power to decide from the concentrated world financial sector exclusively and give it to the overall intellect tempered by now-latent conscience of this planet, coming from all sectors and none. What's to the common, and not the particular perceived advantage? THAT cumulative concern must come to govern us -- lest we not survive. -James Hufferd...... Why We’re Sliding Towards World War By WashingtonsBlog November 25, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "Washingtons Blog" - Why Now? Paul Craig Roberts – former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, former editor of the Wall Street Journal, listed by Who’s Who in America as one of the 1,000 most influential political thinkers in the world, PhD economist – wrote an article about the build up of hostilities between the U.S. and Russia titled, simply: “War Is Coming”. Similarly, Ronald Reagan’s head of the Office of Management and Budget – David Stockman – is posting pieces warning of the dispute between the U.S. and Russia leading to World War 3. Trend forecaster Gerald Celente – who has been making some accurate financial and geopolitical predictions for decades – says WW3 will start soon. Investment fund manager and adviser Martin Armstrong has charted the “cycles of war” back to 600 BC … and says that we’ll have major wars between now and 2020. He has written pieces recently entitled, “Why We will Go to War with Russia“, and another one saying, “Prepare for World War III“. Investment adviser Larry Edelson – who has long studied the “cycles of war” – recently wrote: This year … we will also be hit by another ramping up of the related war cycles. *** All part and parcel of the rising war cycles that I’ve been warning you about, conditions that will not abate until at least the year 2020. Former Goldman Sachs technical analyst Charles Nenner – who has made some big accurate calls, and counts major hedge funds, banks, brokerage houses, and high net worth individuals as clients – says there will be “a major war”, which will drive the Dow to 5,000. Veteran investor adviser James Dines forecast a war as epochal as World Wars I and II, starting in the Middle East. What’s causing the slide towards war? We discuss several causes below. Debt, Economic Collapse and Distraction Martin Armstrong – who studies cycles, and managed multi-billion dollar sovereign investment funds – argues that war plans against Syria are really about debt and spending: The Syrian mess seems to have people lining up on Capital Hill when sources there say the phone calls coming in are overwhelmingly against any action. The politicians are ignoring the people entirely. This suggests there is indeed a secret agenda to achieve a goal outside the discussion box. That is most like the debt problem and a war is necessary to relief the pressure to curtail spending. Armstrong says the same thing caused Turkey to shoot down a Russian fighter jet over Syria: This mess lies squarely in the hands of the Obama Administration and then to have the audacity to pretend Turkey had a right to defend its airspace when not being attacked is just too much. These people NEED war to distract everyone from the Sovereign Debt Crisis that is causing the collapse of governments for a system of borrowing year after year with ABSOLUTELY no intention of ever paying any debt off. The same logic applies to Europe and other countries … Armstrong writes: Our greatest problem is the bureaucracy wants a war. This will distract everyone from the NSA and justify what they have been doing. They need a distraction for the economic decline that is coming. Billionaire hedge fund manager Kyle Bass notes: Trillions of dollars of debts will be restructured and millions of financially prudent savers will lose large percentages of their real purchasing power at exactly the wrong time in their lives. Again, the world will not end, but the social fabric of the profligate nations will be stretched and in some cases torn. Sadly, looking back through economic history, all too often war is the manifestation of simple economic entropy played to its logical conclusion. We believe that war is an inevitable consequence of the current global economic situation. Billionaire investor Jim Rogers notes: A continuation of bailouts in Europe could ultimately spark another world war, says international investor Jim Rogers. *** “Add debt, the situation gets worse, and eventually it just collapses. Then everybody is looking for scapegoats. Politicians blame foreigners, and we’re in World War II or World War whatever.” Economist and investment manager Marc Faber says that the American government will start new wars in response to the economic crisis: “The next thing the government will do to distract the attention of the people on bad economic conditions is they’ll start a war somewhere.” “If the global economy doesn’t recover, usually people go to war.” A Handful of People Make a Killing Off War War is very good for a handful of defense contractors and banksters who make huge sums from backing unnecessary war. America is now officially an oligarchy. And a high-level Bush administration official – Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson – says that the oligarchy controls American war-making decisions. So the people who stand to make a killing from wars push the government into fighting them. Voodoo Economics Many influential economists and talking heads hold the discredited belief that war is good for the economy. Therefore, many are overtly or more subtly pushing for war under the mistaken view that it will help the economy. Challengers Give Declining Empires “Itchy Fingers” Historians say that declining empires tend to attack their rising rivals … so the risk of world war is rising because the U.S. feels threatened by the rising empire of China. The U.S. government considers economic rivalry to be a basis for war. Therefore, the U.S. is systematically using the military to contain China’s growing economic influence. Competition for Resources Is Heating Up In addition, it is well-established that competition for scarce resources often leads to war. For example, Oxford University’s Quarterly Journal of Economics notes: In his classic, A Study of War, Wright (1942) devotes a chapter to the relationship between war and resources. Another classic reference, Statistics of Deadly Quarrels by Richardson (1960),extensively discusses economic causes of war, including the control of “sources of essential commodities.”A large literature pioneered by Homer-Dixon (1991, 1999) argues that scarcity of various environmental resources is a major cause of conflict and resource wars (see Toset, Gleditsch, and Hegre 2000, for empirical evidence). *** In the War of the Pacific (1879–1884), Chile fought against a defensive alliance of Bolivia and Peru for the control of guano [i.e. bird poop] mineral deposits. The war was precipitated by the rise in the value of the deposits due to their extensive use in agriculture. *** Westing (1986) argues that many of the wars in the twentieth century had an important resource dimension. As examples he cites the Algerian War of Independence (1954–1962), the Six Day War (1967), and the Chaco War (1932–1935). More recently, Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990 was a result of the dispute over the Rumaila oil field. In Resource Wars (2001), Klare argues that following the end of the Cold War, control of valuable natural resources has become increasingly important, and these resources will become a primary motivation for wars in the future. Former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan (and many world leaders) admitted that the Iraq war was really about oil, and former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill says that Bush planned the Iraq war before 9/11. And see this and this. Libya, Syria, Iran and Russia are all oil-producing countries as well … Indeed, we’ve extensively documented that the wars in the Middle East and North Africa are largely about oil and gas. The wars in Syria and Iraq are about pipelines. The war in Gaza may be no exception. And see this. And Ukraine may largely be about gas as well. And James Quinn and Charles Hugh Smith say we’re running out of all sorts of resources … which will lead to war. Central Banking and Currency Wars We’re in the middle of a global currency war – i.e. a situation where nations all compete to devalue their currencies the most in order to boost exports. Brazilian president Rousseff said in 2010: The last time there was a series of competitive devaluations … it ended in world war two. Jim Rickards agrees: Currency wars lead to trade wars, which often lead to hot wars. In 2009, Rickards participated in the Pentagon’s first-ever “financial” war games. While expressing confidence in America’s ability to defeat any other nation-state in battle, Rickards says the U.S. could get dragged into “asymmetric warfare,” if currency wars lead to rising inflation and global economic uncertainty. As does billionaire investor Jim Rogers: Trade wars always lead to wars. Given that China, Russia, India, Brazil and South Africa have joined together to create a $100 billion bank based in China, and that more and more trades are being settled in Yuan or Rubles – instead of dollars – the currency war is quickly heating up. Indeed, many of America’s closest allies are joining China’s effort … which is challenging America and the Dollar’s hegemony. Multi-billionaire investor Hugo Salinas Price says: What happened to [Libya’s] Mr. Gaddafi, many speculate the real reason he was ousted was that he was planning an all-African currency for conducting trade. The same thing happened to him that happened to Saddam because the US doesn’t want any solid competing currency out there vs the dollar. You know Gaddafi was talking about a gold dinar. Senior CNBC editor John Carney noted: Is this the first time a revolutionary group has created a central bank while it is still in the midst of fighting the entrenched political power? It certainly seems to indicate how extraordinarily powerful central bankers have become in our era. Robert Wenzel of Economic Policy Journal thinks the central banking initiative reveals that foreign powers may have a strong influence over the rebels. This suggests we have a bit more than a ragtag bunch of rebels running around and that there are some pretty sophisticated influences. “I have never before heard of a central bank being created in just a matter of weeks out of a popular uprising,” Wenzel writes. Indeed, some say that recent wars have really been about bringing all countries into the fold of Western central banking. Runaway Inequality Paul Tudor Jones – founder of the Tudor Investment Corporation and the Tudor Group, which trade in the fixed-income, equity, currency and commodity markets – said recently: This gap between the 1 percent and the rest of America, and between the US and the rest of the world, cannot and will not persist. Historically, these kinds of gaps get closed in one of three ways: by revolution, higher taxes or wars. And see this. War Is Destroying Our National Security, Our Democracy and Our Economy We spent trillions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet we’re now less safe after 13 years of war. Never-ending wars are also destroying our democratic republic. The Founding Fathers warned against standing armies, saying that they destroy freedom. (Update). Perversely, our government treats anti-war sentiment as terrorism. The Founding Fathers – and the father of free market capitalism – also warned against financing wars with debt. But according to Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, the U.S. debt for the Iraq war could be as high as $5 trillion dollars (or $6 trillion dollars according to a study by Brown University.) Indeed, top economists say that war is destroying our economy. But war is great for the bankers and the defense contractors. And – as discussed above – governments are desperate for war. So it’s up to us – the people – to stop wider war. Related Posts Top Financial Experts Say World War 3 Is Coming … Unless We Stop It Perhaps This Is Obama’s Grand Strategy Stockman: If We Want to Bring Oil Prices Down, We Should Stop Beating the War Drums There’s Only One Way to Avoid a Downgrade to U.S. Credit Former U.S. Government Official: U.S. Is ALREADY at War with China and Russia The Entire Economy Is a Ponzi Scheme

Monday, November 23, 2015


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

I think an important aspect to keep in mind about the act of terrorism that was 9/11 is that it was the first modern instance of what I would call terrorism to “turn the page”. Of course, the planet is fairly vast, and not all so-characterized terrorist attacks are interrelated or related in any direct way to 9/11. But even so, a rash of earlier attacks such as the Khobar Towers and embassy bombings, the U.S.S. Cole attack, probably Centennial Park bombing, and certainly the 1993 WTC bombing, among slews of others, were preparatory, creating an at least subliminal public “awareness” setting the stage for 9/11/2001.

9/11 itself was used to successfully turn the page for the world away from primarily civilian aspirations to concentrate on military mobilization and the girding of loins necessary to strike at designated adversaries. The template re-implanted then was a very old one, dating at least from the dread of the Saxons and the colonial Indians, good guys vs. fiendish and subhuman bad guys. More recently, Huns and East Asians, aggressive Nazis and Commies, now “radical Islamists”. At first, the Islamic terrorists’ alleged goal was to get the U.S. military out of Saudi Arabia, the sacred space. After 9/11, it was suddenly expanded to be to determinedly smash the whole western world and annihilate us all.

So, there were (are) these violent terrorists. No doubt. But WHOSE terrorists are they? Who, exactly, is organizing and funding and training them? Who are they ultimately working for, and toward what end? That is the taboo question—the one entirely missing from the completely controlled western mainline media. Because, it’s just to be assumed that they are a self-organized, self-funded, self-motivated and self-started force: the “bad guys”, pure and simple!

The evidence is, though, that it’s a false message and that their attacks – as brutal as they do seem – are more manifestations of false-flag terrorism used to cow and ensnare the world and make war and the worldwide war footing perpetually all-absorbing, paralyzing, dazzlingly profit-making, and consolidating of control over the controllers’ real designated adversary, the world’s people. Every other mode or entity of organization and potential claimant of loyalty besides the hidden imperial power-that-be – the New World Order/way of the world – is to be ultimately anathema or minimalized (remember the imperative of the Roman Empire?) It’s “full-spectrum dominance” X 7 continents with 7+ billion sad-sack dependents.

All of this is achievable only by total deception – “By deception we shall make war.”

9/11 was to switch world attention back to “good guys vs. bad guys” and, most regrettably necessary militarism as a focus. With the very latest terrorist attacks (and especially with the propaganda media’s intense, wall-to-wall response), a second shoe has dropped. The focus now is on forcefully introducing the template for a World War such as has been cogently predicted for some time now by Michel Chossudovsky of Global Research among others. The idea is to place the current designated “bad guys” (ISIS/ISIL/Islamic State) firmly into the bad-guy enemy slot – of course, safely controlled, financed, and trained essentially with U.S./NATO resources, as several of the observant research articles I have recently posted on this web site have explained and documented. (That the same was identically true with al-Qaeda and before that, Abu-Nidal, and earlier, the syndrome of Gladio remains, for the time being, a bit more widely recognized).

But again, the true recognized enemy (read, victim in this case) of the psychopathic criminals who have wrested and forged full control in the west is the people – all the rest of us. So, the best way we can oppose and defeat the subtle but total tyranny coming down on us is by not accepting the propaganda/ disinformation about the world war against terrorism and its constituting events going forward from 9/11 into away beyond the foreseeable future, like the current Paris attacks, to get European allies firmly and angrily on the train this time, preferably in the first cars, where Americans, who have largely had it, really don’t want to be anymore.

As I also indicated in my own previous articles, the Republican primary voters in the U.S. (and a portion of the Democratic voters) are showing us the way at present by repudiating media determination of their favorites – whether they’re choosing a good vessel for their non-acceptance of control by the establishment or not.

The controlled media is trying hard right now 24/7, to install the World War template of permanent (fake) global civil war between the good and bad guys. The “bad guys” ARE bad and to be feared reasonably; but it is really the controllers of these agents and assets who are to be feared far more. Because, later on, other already –fingered enemies can be plugged into the active war template – Assad (of course), the Russians, Iran, China, whomever. And the media can announce the follow-on already-nominated or not-yet-nominated inclusions in a timely manner.

But the media is supposed to be, since the time of the American Revolutionary Era, the essential informant of the people, who must, it is said, be well-informed to make good decisions in a popular sovereignty setting. But now, the people must reject the controlled media’s lies to such an extreme extent that the continually lying media is already very seriously languishing in influence and going broke as an enterprise and simply must adjust to supplying the truth in order to merit and re-elicit a degree of public support necessary both to remain in useful operation as such and coincidentally engender awareness again and rebirth the citizenship responsibilities necessary to recapture governments.

It’s not impossible for that to happen. We just have to pound and pound and pound our counter-message that the media’s message is not just unreliable, it’s totally and calculatedly bogus. In the meantime, our habitual blaming the victim (run-of-the-mill people) will not accomplish this, or any other worthwhile objective, any more than blaming the quasi-Islamic patsies, pathetic as they are will.

And, odd you didn’t hear a word about President Kennedy in the midst of all the roar this year, did you?

Again, and always – Tell the world!!!!!
JH: 11/23/15

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Activist Post - Ten Ways Paris Shooting Looks Like a False-flag Op

Paris Shooting: 10 Ways It Looks Like A Hallmark False Flag Op TOPICS:False FlagsMakia FreemanParis Terror Attacks NOVEMBER 16, 2015 isis-oilBy Makia Freeman The Paris shooting of November 2015 which just occurred on Friday 13th November bears many of the telltale signs of a false flag operation. Now more than 48 hours later, we have some clues that the New World Order manipulators are up to their old tricks again – which are getting very predictable by now. Here are 10 signs that the Paris shooting is yet another false flag attack designed to scare the common citizen (in France and everywhere), demonize Islam, provide “reason” for Governments at G20 and around the world to waste more money and take more liberty fighting terrorism, provide justification for the French Government to increase surveillance, and provide France and NATO with an excuse to escalate violence against Syria. Paris Shooting False Flag Sign #1: Drills on Same Day How many false flags in recent history have all had the same feature: drills at the same time at the same (or a nearby) place? 21st Century Wire reports that Dr. Patrick Pelloux was “a ‘survivor’ of the Charlie Hebdo shootings” who just happened to be on the scene at these shootings. That in and of itself is a coincidence, but Pelloux actually stated that a “multi-site attack exercise” (i.e. a drill) was taking place during the shootings! Paris Shooting False Flag Sign #2: Terrorist Passport Magically Found Stuart Hooper of 21st Century Wire also reports that many mainstream media outlets (AFP, RT, Reuters, ITV, Sky News, AP, Fox News and Sputnik) have been claiming that a Syrian passport was magically found at one of the scenes of the Paris attacks, either on or near the shooter’s body. Remember the terrorist passport on 9/11 that somehow managed to survive heat and fire that could supposedly burn steel, and landed unscathed on the streets below? Remember too the “lost ID” of one of the terrorists in the Charlie Hebdo getaway car? The false flag script is showing signs of predictability … Paris Shooting False Flag Sign #3: Terrorists Already Known to French Authorities It turns out that some of the terrorists were already known to French security agencies, as the Daily Mail reports: French police are hunting 26-year-old Salah Abdeslam, from Brussels, who is accused of renting a Volkswagen Polo used by the suicide bombers who killed 89 people at the Bataclan music venue on Friday. It emerged on Sunday night that French detectives questioned Abdeslam as he crossed the Belgian border and let him go after he showed them his ID card. Detectives soon realised heir blunder when they discovered that Abdeslam had rented a hire car abandoned near the scene of the massacre inside the Bataclan theatre. One the hallmarks of a false flag operation is the way it is “allowed” to happen. People in high places have the power to direct, control and call off people in lower positions in accordance with the overall plan. Were certain known terrorists allowed to gain entry to France? Paris Shooting False Flag Sign #4: Terrorist Declares he is from ISIS As Brandon Turbeville reported, one of the Paris shooters just blurted out “I am from ISIS”, giving us a short and concise soundbite which tells us everything we need to know about the killers. Is it just a coincidence that the Israeli Mossad intelligence front SITE (which have been busted before releasing “ISIS” material that was actually generated by Israel) were the ones to let us all know that ISIS is claiming responsibility for the job? And, if it is really is ISIS, we know what this means: the controllers are now using ISIS in Western nations to further their goals. Bernie Suarez puts it best: Realize that as soon as they suggested that the attackers claimed they were killing “for ISIS”, given what we all know about ISIS, this constitutes 100% proof that the CIA and the West was involved because they are the ones who created, trained, funded and run ISIS. Realize that exposing and destroying ISIS is exactly synonymous with destroying and exposing the new world order, which is why ISIS will never die. Yes, ISIS is now the lifeline of the new world order! >CIA’s ISIS is now the driving force of the new world order and no one should be surprised that as soon as U.S. special forces “advisers” were sent to Syria and the CIA’s counter strategy against Russia began recently, now we have this attack.

Sunday, November 15, 2015

Paul Craig Roberts - Paris and the Matrix

Wednesday, November 11, 2015


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization


Doubling down and adding to my last month’s theme that the world, at a global scale, is predominantly influenced not by U.S. foreign policy per se, but by what I’ve dubbed “Central Establishment Global Strategy” (or CEGS, if you wish), let me try to describe what that amounts to, citing an example and two different cases.

The private sphere, mostly controlled by central bankers/top investing mavens who, with their purportedly low hundreds of trillions of dollars, wielding with acumen the supreme weapon or cudgel of debt, inducing fear, self-preservation and subservience, have subsumed and are dually acting for the most part in the guise of corrupted nation-states (ostensibly, the public sphere). They thus direct or run the world and maintain in tandem its lingering past-applicable illusions in such a way as to sidetrack and smother versions of reality – some far more relevant – trying to challenge or compete with the systematically preposterous version broadcast.

Our so-called national leaders are selected highly-talented front-men (occasionally, women), with little or no discretionary power vested and varying grasp or understanding, who might not realize that they are dupes and tools, but just assume that that’s how the world works. Which it is. And the real movers are thereby almost never suspected, and never responsible or accountable.

If actor’s vanity and a mock-up of levers of power make puppets psychopaths, then they are. President Kennedy volunteered – as it were – to demonstrate that substituting your own brain for theirs in one of those “high leadership” positions gets you killed. But the real psychos are the real controllers, whose motivations and calculations lack the element of compunction. They’re “almost human”, in Laura Knight-Jadzcyk’s phrase. They don’t care if their plan kills 300 or 3 thousand or 300 million over time. In fact, it might be better in their cost/benefit sense if it did – whether by bombing or starving, slow poisoning, or whatever.

9/11 was a perfect false-flag project for them, because it not only achieved its up-front objectives, but also effectively marked a recalcitrant one-third of the population of the controllers’ planet (Muslims, mostly too poor to be efficiently susceptible to manipulation by debt) for mass targeting. And the morally doubtful state monopoly on legitimate violence, especially as exercised through coalitions of coerced “collaborating nations” and patsy terrorists, serves the purposes of selective targeting, pillaging, decimating, and streamlining the surviving remnant (pacification) on its lands. It’s all too neat – really cool.

It is the reverse of justice – in Platonic terms, considered an empty or malleable form – almost as when someone famous said the Constitution is “a goddamn piece of paper”. Convenient, because they can write on it whatever they want. That’s control!

JH: 11/11/15

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

Ken Freeland - Review of HIDDEN HISTORY, by Donald Jeffries

A brief review by Ken Freeland of Hidden History: An Exposé of Modern Crimes, Conspiracies, and Cover-Ups in American Politics by Donald Jeffries [published 2014 by Skyhorse Publishing] Jeffries' little tome is a fairly quick read. It contributes little that is new for conspiracy buffs, but fully delivers nonetheless because of the novel organization of this revisionist historical account, which provides a heuristically valuable framework for these nearly contemporary events. The book begins, naturally, with the “mother of all conspiracies,” the JFK assassination. It then recounts the usual suspects of the sixties and seventies (RFK, MLK assassinations) and examines a few off the beaten track (when was the last time you saw the George Wallace assassination attempt reviewed?). But the real key to this book begins with the Reagan years, and for every succeeding presidential administration for which the author supplies a full examination of all politically motivated deaths, and a summary “body count” per president. This matter-of-fact recounting of what could be construed in many cases as targeted killings provides a new twist to the notion of “continuity of government” that steels the reader's historical understanding of what's really going on behind the curtain of the Oval Office. Jeffries promises that readers will not be able to detect a political agenda in his presentation, and to some extent this is true, insofar as he treats the Republican and Democratic administrations under review with equal disdain. But this does not mean that his political mien is undetectable. Jeffries is a diehard votary of the Kennedy clan. To some extent, this is his strength: It allows for a clear focus on the JFK assassination, and the most thoroughgoing, indeed, painstaking examination of the forensic evidence from the RFK assassination the reader is likely to encounter. A word must be said about this latter chapter: If, like me, you begin the book with only a scant knowledge of this particular conspiracy theory, you will leave the book well educated; this chapter alone is probably well worth the price of the book if your knowledge of assassination history suffers from a similar lacuna. If, on the other hand, you are already very familiar with this case, the you will undoubtedly find this chapter needlessly repetitive and overly focused on details, and take a much dimmer view of it. Jeffries' Kennedyesque bias is a weakness where, in that same chapter, Jeffries lamely presents Bobby Kennedy as the true antiwar hero, and Eugene McCarthy as the embittered also-ran. Anyone who lived through this era knows what a crock that is. This is the only place the author fails so completely to maintain a neutral stance, but it is a glaring His chapter on 9/11 presents the events of the day matter-of-factly as an obvious false-flag operation, and truthers can give it their nihil obstat. All in all, the book is a very worthwhile read, particularly if you missed any of the major conspiracies that have loaded up the American political plate in the past half-century, and you have any brushing up to do. It helps prepare us for what lies ahead in the future... surely more of the same absent a political sea change. We could argue that Obama's drone assassination program represents the culmination of presidential targeted killing, but then, as the mainstream media keep reminding us, there's always the possibility of a Hillary Clinton administration.

James Petras - U.S. News "Troika" Falsification fabrication-and-falsification/5486446.