Individuals willing to be contacted for information and/or leading groups of activists striving for truth around the crimes of 9-11-2001. To request your name be added to this list, or to change or remove your information, please utilize the Contact form linked at the righthand column.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

WHAT IS AT ISSUE? AN INVENTORY - PART 2

What is at issue? An inventory – Part 2

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

*

Continuing my non-comprehensive inventory of major still-unresolved questions regarding the crimes of 9/11/01, picking up where I left off, I will again offer a brief summation of what can be confidently stated at this point in answer to each. Again, please feel free to comment.

6. What is likely to have happened relative to the Pentagon on 9/11?

A. Here, there’s an extreme bifurcation of evidence, like oil and water. On one hand, there are witnesses who claim to have seen at the time an airliner crashing at ground level, at great speed, into an outer wall of the Pentagon, although there is no definitive photographic evidence at least publicly available showing this. On the other hand, what is generally taken to have been an entry hole punched in to the Pentagon outer wall is not anywhere close to large enough to have admitted a full entry of a massive aircraft, and there is no credible wreckage from a jumbo jet fuselage, seats, rotor, or human remains in available visible evidence, either inside or outside the punctured section of wall. In addition, the apparent direction of thrust ascertainable at the edges of the hole was from inside the building outward, indicating an explosion on the inside the more likely cause. There is also said to have been evidence of a relatively much lesser impact on the outer wall in a location nearby. In conclusion, to claim that an airliner flew into, and presumably penetrated through, a broad building wall when there is no corresponding puncture hole or breakage is like maintaining that someone was shot without a corresponding bullet hole in the victim.

7. What were the likely roles of other countries’ intelligence establishments?

A. Among countries whose intelligence establishments have been credibly implicated in 9/11 by independent investigations are Pakistan (alleged payments to “hijacker” decoys), Israel (general involvement, recording of events), and Saudi Arabia (financing). Attributing a certain degree of accuracy to these findings, one can at least posit a modicum of international collaboration in the overall operation. Common prudence to avoid information leakage would seem to suggest that the circle would have been kept limited.

8. What took place in the vicinity of Shanksville, PA on 9/11?

A. The “crash site” crater publicized, and quickly placed off-limits, about twice the size of the sun room of my house (about 20’ X 10’) is questionably small to have swallowed up a whole jetliner, as publicly announced, and no attributable parts of an airliner – let alone that airliner – or crew, seats, or passenger parts have been convincingly retrieved there. Airplane debris has been recovered not far away, though, scattered across the ground for several miles. Such findings would indicate an aircraft disintegrated in mid-air, rather than that one flew whole straight into the ground as alleged, pointing to either an aerial shoot-down or an explosion inside the aircraft. What aircraft it may have actually been has not been credibly established.

9. This is my particular question: What could the perpetrators of 9/11 have reasonably expected to be the results of their actions?

A. With regard to the Twin Towers – If I were to orchestrate a light-constructed aluminum airliner or similar size and weight craft to impact such a vertically-looming edifice as either at approximately 500 mph, I would expect, at maximum, to break off the structure and perhaps topple or detach its upper stories, or possibly to simply smash against it with little effect. To impute to the actual planners an expectation that such an impact would ignite an inferno capable, of all things, of pulverizing in turn the vast majority of each of the two gargantuan structures’ bulk, would be, in my judgment, to grossly insult their intelligence. When you think about it, there is just no way such a result would ever be expected from even a head-on crash, sans really extensive spot-on controlled demolition. On another tack, the introduction of psychologically-profound targeted “eyewitness” testimony to sculpt the viewing world’s perceptions as to what was happening and had just happened on 9/11 was perhaps the most brilliantly successful and awful part of the entire operation.

10. What evidence is in dispute or vociferously doubted, and why?

A. The ample microscopic presence of un-ignited nanothermitic residue in the dust samples from four different locations at Ground Zero is disputed on various grounds by those who want to scuttle the persuasive counter-perception that controlled demolition – not within the province, especially using this source-specific explosive agent, or plausible in this locale, of other than permitted expert implanters – was used to destroy the buildings. Instead, the defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory double down on aviation fuel (kerosene) fires as somehow the cause, and office fires inside Building 7, even though neither can pulverize concrete or release anywhere near sufficient heat to melt or weaken the steel infrastructure. Certified replication of results leading to the conclusions of the paper by Harritt, Jones, et al, no matter how many times repeated and impeccably published, identifying as they do nanothermite residue, the “smoking gun” of 9/11 proving its inside-job status, is never likely to be found convincing or accepted by the defenders of the OCT.

Likewise, in my judgment, those who posit holograms instead of actual aircraft of some kind striking the Towers carry a heavy burden. It is true the images shown on TV and elsewhere may well have been doctored, resulting in telltale imperfections such as those noted. However, the most unlikely, unique capture of relatively clear footage of the first aircraft hitting the North Tower, by the Naudet brothers (U.S. residents since 1989, according to Wikipedia) early on 9/11, although presumably pre-arranged or “staged”, probably are genuine and show a real event, since no mass media were, fairly obviously, involved in instant editing, and little time elapsed before these images’ release to the public.

None of the various alleged artifacts from the planes or passengers (rotors, passports, and the like) appear plausible.

11. What have been the results, positive and negative to date, of the infamous crimes committed on 9/11?

A. Positive – At least, millions more people are now onto the manifold-evidenced reality that our governance and our history are not on the up-and-up and that we are and have been for a very long time subject to inducement and compliance by trickery and wholesale deception. Unfortunately, this ever-growing realization has not yet resulted in effecting reaction or redress.

Negative – Our individual lives have been profoundly unsettled and denigrated and our collective and civil lives and perspectives far more blatantly militarized and forced. Our expectation of justice and effective due process is destroyed, replaced by apprehensions of being crushed in the aggregate and controlled by faceless forces or powers behind the familiar spokespersons we now can only trust, in most cases, to collude against our liberty and well-being as their lesser.

12. Why is nobody admitting nuthin?

A. For three reasons: 1) Most of the operatives in the 9/11 operation had no idea and probably have never dreamed since that what they did even in a tiny way contributed to the death and destruction wrought – eventually world-wide – by a horrendous 9/11. 2) All of those minimally few who were of necessity to be aware of the nature of the operation were extremely carefully chosen and vetted never to leak the modicum they knew, or else programmed under hypnosis or the like to disremember, killed after the fact, or otherwise rendered incapable of disclosure. 3) The remaining surviving small handful of insiders who know details first-hand, or otherwise, are confirmed true-believers without a qualm. If there is someone who knows from inside knowledge and has empathy and a soul, it would be a miracle.

However, the situation is not entirely bleak, because, for one thing, knowledge can serve as a powerful weapon for those in one internal faction to wield against another, wittingly or not disclosing or providing a clear, un-closable window into the whole blasted thing.

JH: 4/9/14

Monday, April 7, 2014

Paul Craig Roberts: "The Official Story on the Murder of Osama Bin Laden"

“Muslims behind the 9/11 Attacks.” The Official Story on the Murder of Osama Bin Laden "Judicial Watch" Played Into The Government’s Hands. Americans Are Blinded By Agendas By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts Global Research, April 03, 2014 paulcraigroberts.org Disinformation succeeds because so many people and interest groups across the political spectrum find that it serves their agendas as well as the agenda of the government. Consider for example the explanation of 9/11 that blamed Muslim terrorists for the attack. This served the interests of the neoconservatives, the private armaments companies, the US military, the private security companies, government security agencies such as the CIA, the left-wing, the right-wing, the Israel Lobby, and the print and TV media. The official explanation gave the neoconservatives the “new Pearl Harbor” that they needed for their program of invasions of Middle Eastern countries. The private armaments companies could look forward to decades of high profits. Wars always bring the military rapid promotions and higher retirement benefits. Private manufacturers of security equipment and spyware enjoy a rising demand for their products and have grown fat from the products sold to the TSA and NSA. Homeland Security has vastly expanded the federal workforce and administrative positions. The left-wing has proof of “blowback” caused by US interference in the internal affairs of other countries. The right-wing has proof that America has enemies against whom defense at all costs is necessary. The Israel Lobby has the US to overthrow the regimes in the way of Israel’s territorial expansion. The media has the story of the century with which to boost ratings and curry the favor of government. These are formidable interests arrayed against the mere obvious truth, obvious, that is, to any educated person. The 2,100 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have no vested interest in any explanation of 9/11. Indeed, they are harmed by disproving, as they have done, the government’s explanation. None of them will ever again get a government contract, and many of their former clients have turned their backs on “those damn anti-Americans who don’t believe their own government!” Cass Sunstein, a Chicago and Harvard law professor who sold out his integrity, if any, to the Obama regime by accepting an appointment and arguing that the federal government should infiltrate the 9/11 truth movement with agents and set-up truth-tellers so that they could be discredited, possibly even prodding them into actions for which they could be arrested. In other words, the government’s story cannot stand the light cast by the facts and independent experts, and the government’s false story must be protected by shutting down the truth-telling experts. The government, Sunstein argued, needs to either gain control over these experts or to shut them down. Just as many different collections of interest groups and people have stakes in the Obama regime’s story of the killing of Osama bin Laden by US Navy SEALS in Abbottabad, Pakistan. This story and its selling by an enthusiastic media guaranteed Obama’s reelection. It served the emotions of super patriots desperate for revenge who wear their gullibility on their sleeves. It served the myth of CIA and NSA prowess. It served the reputation of the killing power of US Special Forces teams. It proved that America won even though it lost the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. All the trillions of dollars spent were worth it. We got revenge on the guy who did 9/11. No one remembered that the US government, unable to find bin Laden for 10 years, had settled on a different “9/11 mastermind,” Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and had him water-boarded 183 times until he confessed to being responsible for 9/11. If Khalid Sheikh Mohammed “was responsible for the 9/11 operation from A to Z,” why were SEALS sent, illegally, into Pakistan to murder bin Laden? As the FBI says, there is no evidence that bin Laden is responsible for 9/11. That is why bin Laden was not wanted on that charge by the FBI, as the FBI publicly stated. How was bin Laden, who was known in 2001 to be suffering from terminal illnesses, including renal failure, and whose death was widely reported in 2001 still alive ten years later to be murdered by SEALs? What sense does it make that the greatest terrorist leader of our time only had two unarmed women to protect him. What sense does it make that the US would murder the terrorist mastermind with all the plots in his head instead of capturing and questioning him? How can anyone be so gullible as to believe such a nonsense tale as told to them by Obama and the presstitute media? Is America really a nation of utter fools? Like the 9/11 story, the story of bin Laden’s murder is losing credibility with the US population. Pakistani National TV shot Obama’s story down with an eyewitness interview that reported that not one single person, dead body, or any piece of evidence left Abbottadad, because the only helicopter that landed blew up when it attempted to leave and there were no survivors. No other helicopters landed. So there was no dead bin Laden to be buried at sea (there are no known witnesses to the alleged burial) and no photographs of a dead bin Laden. Yet the nonexistent photos of a dead bin Laden have now emerged in controversy. Allegedly, the US government had photos of bin Laden’s corpse after he was blown away by trigger-happy SEALs who didn’t have enough sense to keep the “mastermind” alive for questioning. The tough macho SEALs were so threatened by two unarmed women that they just opened fire. Judicial Watch has been trying to pry the (nonexistent) photos of a dead bin Laden from the government’s hands. For “national security reasons” the US government does not want anyone to see evidence that supports its far-fetched tale of bin Laden’s murder. The photographic evidence of a successful raid are off limits. They are like the alleged videos of the airliner hitting the Pentagon that we are not permitted to see for “national security reasons.” In other words, the photos and videos do not exist and never did. No government, not even the American one, would be so totally stupid as to withhold the evidence for its claims. The government, seeing its unbelievable stories lose believability at home and abroad used Judicial Watch’s lawsuit to boost the credibility of its story. Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit for the photos that the Obama regime alleged to have of the murdered bin Laden but refused to release. Obviously, the government has no such photos and never had any such photos. But the government does not need evidence when it can rely on the gullibility of the American people. As the government had no photos to release, the US government decided to use the opportunity presented by Judicial Watch to bolster its story that photos of bin Laden murdered and dead were once in its possession. The government released to Judicial Watch a document under the Freedom of Information Act that is an order from Special Operations Commander Admiral William McRaven to “destroy immediately” the photos of the dead bin Laden. Judicial Watch took the bait. Instead of realizing that there was no reason whatsoever for the government to destroy the only evidence that might support its claim to have murdered bin Laden, Judicial Watch focused on the illegality of destroying the evidence. Judicial Watch says that “Federal law contains broad prohibitions against the ‘concealment, removal, or mutilation generally’ of government records.” http://www.globalresearch.ca/top-pentagon-leader-ordered-destruction-of-bin-laden-death-photos/5368389 Judicial Watch played into the government’s hands. Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton was maneuvered by the government into defining the scandal as the destruction of evidence, “revealing both contempt for the rule of law and the American people’s right to know.” To the contrary, the real scandal is the massive lie that bin Laden was killed by a SEAL raid and the acceptance of this lie by the American people and Judicial Watch. By damning the government for destroying evidence, Judicial Watch has given credibility to the government’s claim that SEALs murdered Osama bin Laden. The SEAL team credited with bin Laden’s murder was quickly eliminated when the team was loaded onto a 1960s vintage helicopter in Afghanistan. Apparently the team members were asking one another, “Were you on that mission that killed bin Laden?” Of course, no one was, and this information was too dangerous for the Obama regime.

Sunday, March 30, 2014

WHAT IS AT ISSUE? AN INVENTORY - PART 1

What Is At Issue? An Inventory -- Part 1

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

^ ^ ^

Insistent apologists for the Official Conspiracy Theory that the U.S. was brazenly attacked on 9/11/01 by less than a score of Middle Eastern terrorist operatives, commanded from afar by onetime U.S. Saudi asset Usama bin Laden, using hijacked airliners, declare repeatedly that all significant questions relating to the incidents have been definitively put to rest.

From the standpoint of all of the physical and nuanced circumstantial evidence, however, literally hundreds of questions, large and small, many of which might be subsumed or reduced for convenience to a dozen or so broader, more general queries, remain unresolved and ignored by the U.S. government and the mainstream media as a whole. In this two-part posting, I will attempt to provide an inventory, or rundown, in non-technical terms, of these major outstanding questions, together with a brief summation of what can be confidently stated at this point in answer to each. Please feel free, by way of comment, to agree, take exception to, or reframe any or all of my list of questions and suggested replies.

1. Is the OCT (Official Conspiracy Theory) reliable in any way?

A. Absolutely not. No credible evidence exists that any Muslims, or hijackers, were aboard any of the purported aircraft. And for high-rise buildings to be collapsed, let alone largely pulverized to dust, by impact or fuel or office fires even under optimal conditions is scientifically impossible.

2. Who is likely to have committed the crimes of 9/11?

A. Exclusivity of pre-9/11 access to the bowels of the high-rise buildings and the presence of numerous radar-befuddling U.S. and Canadian military aerial exercises coupled with apparent stand-down orders precluding interception of any of the three allegedly impacting aircraft supports the conclusion that the whole crime spree was what has been termed an “inside job”, performed by or with the approval of parts of the U.S. government.

3. What caused the WTC buildings to collapse as they did?

A. The fact that all three buildings (one of which was not hit by a plane) fell absolutely symmetrically at virtually free-fall speed, with numerous hundreds-of-pound lengths of steel beam being hurled hundreds of feet laterally in various directions indicated the employment of highly-skilled highly energetic controlled demolition.

4. What kinds of aircraft were involved and what was their role and relevance?

A. Most likely, given the obvious importance assigned to successfully completing the mission, coupled with the lack of credible evidence of any Muslims or hijackers aboard, the actual aircraft employed, whether airliners, missiles, or military drones, were remotely guided. The nature of the purported wreckage produced later does not in any way suggest that the aircraft used were the airliners reported to have been involved. Since nothing relating to the aircraft could have brought about the resulting collapse and predominant pulverization of the high-rise buildings, it must be concluded that their employment was for the purpose of producing a deception.

5. Why were so many of those implicated as having been involved dual-citizens, dual-nationals, or Jews?

A. Many of the prominent signatories of the late-‘90s Project For a New American Century document foretelling a “new Pearl Harbor” as a pretext for wholesale invasion of the Middle East, fulfilled by the 9/11 crimes and subsequent reaction, were, in fact, dual-national Israeli-Americans. This is presumably because a top Zionist objective was to strike decisively, in tandem with the west, against the state of Israel’s Middle Eastern foes. And many of those such as WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein and neocon zealots placed in critical U.S. government agencies were Israeli dual-nationals. Israel’s top leaders and known operatives – some of whom exhibited undeniable fore-knowledge of the dramatic events, were openly jubilant in their wake, because Israel seemed to have the most to gain from a serious scapegoating of Middle Eastern Muslims. Thus, there is little reason to doubt that the 9/11 crimes were the product of collaboration at some level.

To be continued~
JH: 3/30/14

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

THE TRUTH IS INEFFABLE

The Truth is Ineffable

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

////////

Human thought might mirror language – I don’t know. You’d have to ask an expert in semiology or some such specialty. But let’s start this discussion at the beginning – since one of our biggest problems is that we tend to speak before thinking.

I do know that language, carefully-chosen or careless, directs, regulates, and controls thoughts much as a traffic cop directs traffic. And the recognized establishment (the élite) is the looming traffic cop as far as proper and permitted topics and permitted conclusions for the majority of members of society. Getting closer than that, in most cases, to who precisely decides these things – what may be brought up and discussed and what is germane to conclude – is hard to pinpoint. Although a president warning that there are not to be any so-called “outrageous conspiracy theories” about 9/11 would be one clear-as-day exception to that. (As well as would be a president years later declaring that the whole matter was decided and concluded and the guilty role of Osama and the 19 “a fact”). And likewise significantly, a solemn religious service aired ubiquitously nationwide to extend sacred cover to 9/11 to suggestively exclude profane analysis of the monumental transgressions committed on that ineffable (meaning unmentionable, therefore unthinkable), yet all-too-commonly mis-referenced day.

A more mundane example of speech directing thought: We never hear, as we once did, biofuels prominently referenced as substitutes calculated to wean us from petroleum dependence, even though the grain enthanol industry continues, offering a competitively-priced vehicle fuel that is up to 85% biofuel alcohol and only 15% petroleum. (Of cource, forward-looking Brazil was already running virtually all of its private motor vehicles on 100% sugarcane alcohol a quarter of a century ago). Thus, as many Midwesterners realize, in direct response to the predictable hostility to such a troublesome notion by the rich and powerful petroleum lobby, the very real possibility of wholesale substitution of petroleum by much cleaner and ultimately cheaper renewables has vanished from our collective radar. Of course, the oilers point out that the energy required to refine the alcohol from the source crop adds greatly to the expense. But, does this cost exceed that of recovering and refining gasoline – as well as the raw cost of trying to wrest possession of much of it from its far-away rightful owners by brutal military intervention, none of which they bother to mention? Doubtful.

And who do you suppose largely owns the petroleum industry? Ditto the communications industry, the international drug trade, including “legal” pharmaceuticals and chemicals, and increasingly the related food industry and war materiel, communications, service industries of all kinds? Who owns anything, in fact, with truly high-end potential and earnings? Answer: the same stupendously-moneyed central banking and financial houses whose avatars literally pull the strings of the front- and shadow-governments of the world’s collection of puppet regimes.

That’s the message of my last two articles – which largely drew dismissal or silence from the “knowing”. And some earlier postings alluded to it, too. I suggested that the amorphous organs of governance away up at the top where the real-life “Unitary Executive” holds imperceptible sway and has for decades, were likely the ultimate originators of the directed activity that surfaced on 9/11.

And the response that commonly came back was, “You don’t know that”. Or, “How do you know that?” My answer: Because they’ve been ultimately responsible for creating virtually every other major shock event in the world over the past several decades. They’ve bragged about it a few times, and once or twice, most notably at the start of the 1930s Depression, the public has even fleetingly caught on. And, as for 9/11, these longest-shadow plotters pull the strings of the regimes most-commonly implicated in 9/11, the U.S. and Israel, and certainly (I believe) wouldn’t countenance any of their vassal states shaking up the world apart from the long-established command structure.

So, I stand by the suggested partial list of the NWO’s habits of executive operation I offered last time. These are observable elements of their M.O.:

1) The absolute exclusive and exclusionary worship and service of money. From top to bottom, money expresses irresistible power – buys access, installs personnel, prevails legally and legislatively, arbitrarily transfers ownership, commands “justice”, launches wars and governmental coups.

2) Independence and unaccountability of a distinct governing class. Wealthy families and individuals are in fact a law apart. Citizenship rights of effective participation in and more than incidental benefits from governing have transferred almost entirely from ordinary citizens (regarded as so many street urchins) to corporations and primarily mega-corporations (the specialized investment tools of the top-level NWO associates and their operatives).

3) Fabrication of truth. Bona fide scientific evidence is ignored unless useful to the NWO’s purpose. The “truth” is whatever the NWO declares it to be.

4) Prior positive determination. Only the intents and purposes of the NWO determine the profile of events to unfold. Means are found to so reshape the toolkit and landscape accordingly. (9/11 is a good example: purpose determined, directive issued, means found or shaped to achieve.)

5) Inconsideration of general welfare or collateral consequences. An operation (a war, 9/11, financial catastrophe, ecological or nuclear disaster, staged psy event), if deemed beneficial for an NWO purpose, adverse human or ecological cost is ignored. An objective is sometimes delayed to deceive the public, a false priority touted, or an egregious objective pursued or carried out beyond public view. But always in the name of the public.

6) A subjective sanity norm. All meaningful dissenters from the “norm” (whatever the NWO’s decided intent is) are called “delusional” and “criminal”. This week, Vladimir Putin, to be isolated for Russia’s holdout banking system independence (though no longer totally separate, if ever), similar to that of Libya previously, joined 9/11 Truth in these assigned categories.

7 Association of operatives. Only the very topmost circles of global governing élite – central bank barons and top financiers primarily – are favorably served by NWO objectives. Subordinated associates and a myriad of front-line operatives in all capacities are fed with ample opportunities, stroked, and not-too-subtly reminded of the outer darkness and gnashing teeth or far worse awaiting nonconformity through constant real-life examples.

8. Reckless enamorment with technology. Vast black budgets, producing futuristic gadgets and scientific means unknown to the rest of humanity, are robustly deployed to achieve NWO-determined purposes and objectives by their dominated militarily-organized and other agency operatives and arms.

And our usually-implicated gang of perps got 9/11 done. The real head-perps? At this point, if you mention them at all or suggest their involvement going forward still today, you’re automatically installed in the ranks of kookdom and cited and tweeted for buzzed delusionary ranting – due to someone somewhere controlling discourse to discourage investigation into precisely who those driven serial uber-powerful head-perps are and how they do what they do. So, call me crazy! Even you may, conditioned, scoff and dismiss. But, I’ll double down and win. It’s one world blanket shadow government, with Russia and China struggling on the outs as the “free” world totters sightless at the brink.

JH: 3/19/14

Thursday, March 6, 2014

NWO - MO

NWO – M.O.
by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization
0-0-0-0

Know the territory! Catch the drift! Know the lay of the land, the rules! Live and learn, or die stupid! As activists, we have to be aware that 9/11 wasn’t done on a whim in a day, by accident or one rogue cell, that the identity of the act and its shockingly criminal aftermath (from a benefit-loss analysis by the never-consulted near-totality of humanity) fit seamlessly into the pattern of controlled human events we subsume under the rubric “New World Order”: a not-so-untypical blow.

Just as the Jesus portrayed in the NT instructs his followers that the Kingdom he goes on rapturously about until they covet it is not the layout wholly of some future dispensation, but exists now “within you” (construed by some as “among you” to avoid vaguely occultist associations), the NWO is likewise not some perverse (or idealized, depending) reshuffle, reclaim, reverse the gains and reset for most from the Enlightenment someday, but is actually in over-the-top full-tilt operation now. And has been for more than a few years. And most of the context of our day-to-day lives is designed and superimposed today, accounting for variations, accordingly.

Its core objective? To protect and maintain the perceived right to domain and special primacy of the successors to the top élite who experienced the debacle of an effective popular challenge and considerable erosion of their exclusiveness and power in and following the Enlightenment and have just now recovered by central banking and sleight of hand most or all lost ground and are forging undeniably ahead (so they think). It’s hard to imagine them totally ignorant that such is at the ever-mounting ruinous expense and loss of life’s possibilities of now up to billions of their equally-rightful fellow inhabitants on the planet, whose rights they trample, liquidate, and utterly disregard. Philanthropy cannot even soften their devastation.

Accordingly, I believe that attempting to recognize, delineate, and catalogue, elements of the NWO’s discernible modus operandi, through a vast variety of means and agencies, can help clarify our understanding as a movement of both 9/11 and related events, past and as they continue to unfold daily, and of the NWO itself: lest anyone deceive you.

Due to constraints of time and space, I can suggest only a small such list of observed tendencies, habits, or operative characteristics of the prodigious, highly- organized NWO entity’s purposefully-imposed hyperactive workings here, to consider, discuss, adopt hopefully as useful, and keep in mind. Then, let me know what you think, if you agree or not with my observations, and add, if you will, your observations to the list. I’ll share any feedback or suggestions I receive. I might add that this may sound hard, but it’s not. It’s simply a description of how the NWO seems consistently to do what it considers its business to attain its ends.

My list of suggested elements to start such a process of inventorying these principles of NWO’s operational means and tendencies is presented below. The larger-than-life subject dealt with is, of course, the long-predicted and increasingly recognized totalitarian entity now increasingly identified as the “New World Order”, verbally (no doubt purposefully) first thrust upon most of us without explanation by a proud acolyte, President George H.W. Bush, back in or about 1990, and today an undeniable stultifying presence entangling our individual and collective lives without our slightest permission, without our need or any real justification, invalidating constitutional contracts empowering and protecting rights of populations worldwide, not least being majority self-government and privacy.

OBSERVED OPERATING PRINCIPLES OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

1) The absolute exclusive and exclusionary worship and service of money. From top to bottom, money expresses irresistible power – buys access, installs personnel, prevails legally and legislatively, arbitrarily transfers ownership, commands “justice”, launches wars and governmental coups.

2) Independence and unaccountability of a distinct governing class. Wealthy families and individuals are in fact a law apart. Citizenship rights of effective participation in and more than incidental benefits from governing have transferred almost entirely from ordinary citizens (regarded as so many street children) to corporations and primarily mega-corporations (the specialized investment tools of the top-level NWO associates and their operatives).

3) Fabrication of truth. Bona fide scientific evidence is ignored unless useful to the NWO’s purpose. The “truth” is whatever the NWO announces it to be.

4) Prior positive determination. Only the intents and purposes of the NWO determine the profile of events to unfold. Means are found to so reshape the toolkit and landscape accordingly. (9/11 is a good example: purpose determined, directive issued, means found or shaped to achieve.)

5) Inconsideration of general welfare or collateral consequences. An operation (a war, 9/11, financial catastrophe, ecological or nuclear disaster, staged psy event), if deemed beneficial for an NWO purpose, adverse human or ecological cost is ignored. An objective is sometimes delayed to deceive the public, a false priority touted, or an egregious objective pursued or carried out beyond public view. But always in the name of the public.

6) A subjective sanity norm. All meaningful dissenters from the “norm” (whatever the NWO’s decided intent is) are called “delusional” and “criminal”. (This week, Vladimir Putin, to be isolated for Russia’s holdout banking system independence (though no longer totally separate, if ever), similar to that of Libya previously, joined 9/11 Truth in these assigned categories).

7) Association of operatives. Only the very topmost circles of global governing élite – central bank barons and top financiers primarily – are automatically served by NWO objectives. Subordinated associates and a myriad of front-line operatives in all capacities are fed with ample opportunities, stroked, and not-too-subtly reminded of the outer darkness and gnashing teeth or far worse awaiting nonconformity through constant real-life examples.

8) Reckless enamorment with technology. Vast black budgets, producing futuristic gadgets and scientific means unknown to the rest of humanity, are robustly deployed to achieve NWO-determined purposes and objectives by their dominated militarily-organized and other agency operatives and arms.

JH/ 3/06/14

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

PARTS & PARCELS OF REALITY

Parts & Parcels of Reality

by JamesHufferd,Ph.D.

Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

______ Everybody acculturated and civilized seems afraid to touch 9/11. Certainly everyone with access to officially approved-of media, the regularly reviewable book press, or a microphone they didn’t have to seize leaves the details a gaping, loud-shouting blank. Because that unique, seemingly-impossible day in American history is integrated as part of the national mythology, populated only by the mythological villains the drooping pathological fabric of our career since needs for its repeated justification, in order to have “America, the bold” still fulfilling its accustomed starring role. Interjecting clarifying details that make it all otherwise – as we try to do – messes up the story most Americans rely on for safety, the illusion of sanity, and sustained satisfaction that we’re the greatest and must forever strive to so remain. Likewise, finding out that PT-109 was really a stone-boat and just got in the way, or that what Lincoln really meant was that horses and dogs should be freed wouldn’t help at all myth-wise. Such revelations, for most Americans, would be equivalent by now to shifting the blame for 9/11.

As it is, we Truthers (or 9/11 Truth Movement adherents, if you prefer) are regarded as dogs – uncouth and unwashed in the shadows at the edge of the camp. It isn’t a question of literal truth That question is rarely permitted or entertained. And shouting our message of evidence and reason louder probably isn’t going to help: If it were to be effective, it probably would have caught fire amidst the public a long time ago. Even people who know and are inclined to agree with us don’t really want to hear it, to risk bearing responsibility for choosing to embrace what it would mean if taken seriously. And we likely wouldn’t know what to do next ourselves at this point if what we’ve been saying really started to take hold. As activists, we are too few, disunited, irresolute, too feeble altogether to turn the tide on this long-decided, overwhelmed issue with barely a discernible pulse left now.

Our job, instead, would seem to be to continue to hang in there as tenaciously as we can and maintain 9/11 Truth as a living testimony until such time as serendipity or the restless succession of fads or some unforeseeable act or trend or engaging spokesman wittingly or not brings public perception to the place where the dire and, to many, way-too-disheartening tidings we offer somehow fits the prevailing storyline at that time. Then, all we have to say, all of our largely unassailable accumulated and for us and anyone unbiased clear evidence and its world of attached meaning and fleeting or sustained call to action will be welcomed, or at least accepted, to help satisfy what people will at last think they are cleverly onto.

To quote the first sentence of a superb history of American merchandising (Land of Desire by William Leach), “Whoever has the power to project a vision of the good life and make it prevail has the most decisive power of all”. Contrast that with the proposition that your dear parents whom you have always trusted to care for and protect you are really crass, violent criminals, known as such to people all over town, who carelessly disregard and endanger your life and livelihood and blow your inheritance on monstrous homicidal gambits they collude to pin on innocent others. Take your pick between the two visions, with your parents or the most-respected people you know and rely on in the role of the knaves. People on the whole blame the consequent current downturn in most of our personal fortunes, such as they are, on a measure of incompetence, not on systematic duplicity. As we would too. Except, we know that conclusive scientific evidence doesn’t lie.

And another matter to consider is: who do we mean when we blithely refer to the “planners” or “perpetrators” of 9/11 that we want to unmistakably identify and bring to justice? Are the people who carried out the crimes synonymous with the people who planned them? And who gave the planners the orders or directive(s) to plan such a thing? There are, after all, different levels of culpability corresponding with these very different stations and specializations.

But, I would go all the way back to the investors and strategists behind the phenomenal success of the anything but willy-nilly giant merchandisers and precise analysts who fabricated and sold the American dream beginning in earnest around the end of the nineteenth century to find the impetus, means, and incipient cast. (Note that a similar miraculous upward transference of skills and success to that required then emanated in shattered and lowly Japan following World War II, traveling seamlessly overnight from first flooding the earth with trinkets, cheap bobbles, and small consumer items in the ‘50s to dominating in mass-market vehicles so preferable they had to be artificially ratcheted downward perceptually by an apparently induced product failure scandal not long ago, advancing to a commanding position in the new plethora of sophisticated consumer electronics.)

But most of the leading forgers of the original and continuing Americans-as-salable-consumers dream, as a matter of fact, and not of either prejudice or imagination, happened to be Jewish, for one simple reason. Because, by and large, an overwhelming amount of the capital of both money and audacity required to plan and carry forth such an enterprise to dominate American life and thought for a century was in Jewish financial hands. (Henry Ford’s showcased anti-Semitism was no doubt born of competitive pique and perhaps envy.) True, somewhat comparable amounts of money accrued from other enterprises of the time, such as steel, oil, and pharmaceuticals and chemicals invested primarily by non-Jews. But none of these lines were so central to the dream as the dazzling new array of progressively-affordable glistening décor, utensils, and gadgetry, along with the matching array of fetching types of deep analysis and the addictive behavior fueling them that have so successfully captivated and captured most Americans and still do to the extent that most refuse to see past their now progressively less-affordable ever-present allure, while patronizing and protecting immensely-lucrative, even more arcane and intricately mass-financed sports spectacles, war, box-office themes, and guns as over-the-top bastions of robust, typically shameless American jingoism, all as needlessly subsidized as they are fat and abused.

Not coincidentally, right in the midst of the earlier heyday of European central banking, requiring unrivaled fabulous amounts of accumulated capital to foot, especially in order to pay the sums to buy and anesthetize all the governments, the organizational aspect of Zionism was founded under the leadership of Theodor Herzel in Basel, Switzerland in 1897. (Basel being central yet today as the seat of the central bankers’ bank housed in the infamous looming “Tower of Basel”, the Bank of International Settlements, reportedly set to emit the global currency.)

The avowed object of the intricate new Zionist organization set up then to skillfully channel untold capitalization primarily by the Rothschild extended family and financial enterprises strictly according to plan, was to obtain a “Jewish state” in the Biblical Jewish homeland, Palestine. And according to Herzel, it wasn’t to be a state animated by a religion at all, but rather a state synonymous with a Jewish nation – a nation-state. And on this one point at least, the Jews who envisioned and achieved the state of Israel were in agreement with the Nazis: that the Jews constituted a separate nation. In the 1930s, in fact, cooperative efforts were made by Nazi officials to secure an enclave in Palestine in order to export Germany’s Jews, such being seen as an easier solution. (See Mark Weber, Journal of Historical Review, Jl-Aug, 1993, p. 29 ff.).

Ironically, who primarily funded Hitler’s Reich in the first place? The Max and Paul Warburg controlled Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam (Zionists) and the Schroeder Bank of Frankfort, London, and New York (Zionist all). (See J. Speer Williams, “Hitler Was a Zionist Stooge”, Darkmoon, online posted March 2, 2013).

And “Never again” (remembering all of the rejections, expulsions, and vengeful pogroms of centuries) was the Jewish slogan at least in spirit animating their drive to acquire Israel long before the Holocaust made the object practicable.

But the funding available from the ever-accumulating haul of the central bankers (adding the American largely same-owned franchise – deliberately misnamed the Federal Reserve – to the cache in 1913) was far vaster than required to finance and make hyper-productive a pipsqueak Jewish state in the previously sterile Levant. Plenty was available as well to monopolize media and entertainment industries and neutralize the government and in effect command the military might of the richest and most powerful state in history, America.

And according to the not-too-idle boasts of sometimes loose-lipped associates Bush, Sr. and David Rockefeller, all of the shock events over the last more than a century are attributable to the machinations of the crème-de-la-crème societies, completely taboo for serious mortals to even mention in public, such as the Bilderberg group. Except that the smooth uniformity of intensity and incalculable mass-murderous consequences of practically non-stop assorted mayhem that we, our parents, and grandparents have suffered must be formulated from a single unified source of concise but brazen planning still higher, to be trans- and enacted through the collective agency of the almost invisible élite societies. And issuing a directive to turn the American public and establishment, through skillfully manipulated and deflected anger and mayhem, to initiate what amounted to militarization of the culture at home and brutal, ever-widening conquest or pacification abroad certainly fits. And subsequently siphoning all of the operating wherewithal out of the grasp of the hapless populace to distribute as an endearing giant wet reward to the well-to-do few does as well.

But an essential point to keep in mind is that the overturning of enormous human gains from the Enlightenment of late that have stymied even the seemingly simple objective of 9/11 Truth – the recent denigration and replacement of objective science and popularly-based governance with crazed financial fiat from on high and media-dispersed pronouncement and lies is not religious in nature of any stripe. It is rather money and exclusiveness of power driven. 9/11, like so much else especially since was (and is) in fact driven by a sort of élite exclusiveness supremacy doctrine, a gambit to concentrate the world mind and function of direction into a few soulless skulls and frames and material rewards into far fewer hands. And, as always, this sort of supremacy too can be vanquished only through the application of better souls and minds.

And so it goes. The above is not intended in any way to denigrate anyone. If any part is proven inaccurate, I will cheerfully and gladly concede.

JH: 2/25/14

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

9/11 Plane Affidavit by John Lear, Son of Learjet Inventor

http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2012/03/911-airplane-affidavit-by-john-lear-son-of-learjet-inventor-1935777.html