Who Are We? And Who Are They?

Who Are We? And Who Are They? By James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization * The persistent, seemingly universal resistance to our message of Follow and Apply the Evidence (a resistance that never mentions the evidence it resists) has nothing to do with the truth, even with disputing it. It’s all about protecting the order, ultimately, of the cosmos as these people see it. For them, it’s about protecting the integrity of the whole, universal fabric of things, of a functioning economy of course benefitting them, of civilization, of culture, their put options and martinis (or lemonade if they are a little lower) in the afternoon, from all being ripped apart, the whole thing unraveling. We believe that people should promulgate and adjust their own conditions of life, on their own and through their representatives in government. They believe that everyone should fall into line behind the dictates of the few or even the One in command of the most vital money, regardless that few (or One) be self-indulgent, heartless jackasses – setting the tone for their followers. Ultimately, we in 911 Truth are challenging the oppression that has thus been foisted in obedience, iron-clad, over the earth, people and planet. This is an oppression that has blocked and muted our meaningful direct participation and intervention by voice in opposition to their psychologically-brilliant selling of all or most elements of their program of fact-replacement, coercion, plunder and murder as something desirable and necessary “to protect us”. They are the drivers of the New World Order, beginning in earnest with 9/11 and moving forward, shocking and impoverishing everybody else, based on that. They the spiders have anesthetized we the beetles, a precious few of whom, resistant, have woken up to recover a different vision. They have taken full, if bumpy, control of the world as we slept. They’re the real hijackers, deniers, shape-shifters. We represent their hated past and dogged present. They mustn’t give the facts a platform! But we probably won’t all be exterminated like the Cathars (although we could be swept up if too successful; that’s not our present problem). Evil probably can’t remain hidden forever; too many inquiring minds will suspect. And what we, 9/11’s “Truthers”, resisters of lies, will turn out, if noted at all, to be – guides or bywords - is up to us. JH: 5/14/13

ASYMMETRICAL IDEOLOGICAL WAR

ASYMMETRICAL IDEOLOGICAL WAR By James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization *** There is a force that is very seriously considered by the kingpins of the New World Order’s transnational (though strongly tilted toward U.S.) high offices of Propaganda & Obfuscation and Persuasion & Obliteration as a realistic threat to their massive but thin as optic-fiber gossamer control over the earth and its downward-spiraling destiny. It’s not the almost pre-horse and buggy pop-guns of citizens who might otherwise be stamp-collecting, or the sulfur, steam, and ball-bearing pressure bombs (a form of IED) allegedly common to Arab and Afghan Muslims and tougher-to-villainize pro-freedom Caucasian fighters. No! It’s the people who have dared tip-toe past all the “Warning! National Security!” signs to peek through the curtain, and who applied the laws of nature and physics to what they saw. It is WE who keep shouting silently, deprived of a mic, in the face of the NWO Empire’s fast-forwarding daily spin-meister liars in open, if not widespread, response to their shoddy narrative, with the message that they surely invent and enormously lie about the “War on Terror” as the sparks fly upward. We shout defiantly, but are seldom heard, being denied a platform: “No! No, it’s not so! The War on Terror is a lie!” But, we declare it, because we among humankind are not afraid of our own tiny shadow nor of their enormity, or of finding no one walking along beside us even if only to bear witness. But we are harbingers, not fools. We walk with faith in the eventuality that truth, even if beyond our current Dark Ages, will shine forth, stand out in relief. Because the shape and substance of the truth is often right there in front of us if we pay attention. Others think fuzzy and lazy, to conform what’s there into what they’re told to see. But we, alone in a frenzied crowd, don’t need to make things up about conspiracies or self-serving delusions that others must have in order to report something different from reality. No, we just report what they would if they were truthful and not held in line like iron filings lined up by a magnet of un-freedom, theoretically individual, but as anyone can observe if willing, controlled. And we relate all that we see of the magnet and its pathological control by illusion, fear instilled by almost-daily shock events and their shallow and sham reportage, all the way back to 9/11, the hinge between the former world and now, the mother and key to all false-flag activity since. Here’s a tip: Google “FBI set up terrorists” and see all of what you find. You may have already known this – it’s clearly in the public domain, and from some clearly “mainstream” sources. Read it well. This is a bit of knowledge, of awareness, that we need to keep repeating in conversations with friends, in letters to the editor, in emails and correspondence, and in Facebook, Twitter, and wherever else we can, ad nauseum: that people should, at minimum, never discount the distinct possibility that, whatever the horrific event, whether it be “natural” or foisted by human agency, the Feds or their rewarded servants, in liege to the NWO itself, actually did it. Depending, they could have done it by HAARP, hypnotism, betrayal, double-speak, bait-and-switch, reliance on the public forgetting, or whatever. And the deed is done accordingly to punish, control the general mind, or gain impunity to carry out unspeakable, inhuman attacks. But if we can just get that word out and about, we can turn a sufficient share of the public’s perception, here and abroad. At first, no one will believe us. They will call us something vile and put our contention completely out of mind as something way too wacky and sinister. But if we don’t stop saying it – everywhere, at every opportunity – and if we take care not to refer categorically to any one act as a false-flag unless we have virtual proof that it is, people will start to wonder if “terrorist” acts in general and even really horrific weather or seismic events might not actually be set-ups. That will be an alarming fad for the controllers – who will inevitably protest too much, as evidence of it spreads! And, once enough people, being tipped-off about the insiders’ M.O., begin to notice the contradictions and absurdities in the false, self-serving narrative being offered up daily, showing most that the easily-provable as false official story of 9/11 is bogus should become a piece of cake. I bet the Russians under the U.S.S.R. – who knew their news was cooked – wouldn’t have bought it if it had happened there! And then, enough of the U.S. public, becoming newly-aware, would be irate enough at their country being economically pillaged, trashed, and played for fools, duped into being supporters of gangs of truly unjustified murderers and destroyers on a grand scale overseas to make it an issue – to demand justifying evidence supporting the fairy-tale of a 9/11 foreign terrorist attack. Which doesn’t exist! That’s how Vietnam ended. The public demanded justification. There was none. So the charade, and the war, ended. That’s how the FED was driven into retrenchment – except for its fascist coup attempt – in the 1930s. For this tried and true technique to work with the current ratocracy and the cover-up, we have to spread the word about the common origin of the related rash of “terrorism” and shock. JH: 4/24/13

What a Difference

What a Difference by James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization _____ According to Mark Twain, “If voting made any difference, they wouldn’t let us do it.” And in accordance with that reasoning, I conclude that only one party shows it thinks it makes any difference by trying to prevent it. And the real reason it doesn’t make any difference, presuming it doesn’t, is because, at any level above dog-catcher, it’s all a show, to absorb our likes and hates and raging preferences for this and whatever other outcome, while the real decisions and directions are dictated from elsewhere. I don’t think the mounting evidence for this conclusion would even amount to news for Mark Twain. On 9/11, they said, 19 Middle Eastern (meaning “Muslim”) hijackers – a certain 19, with faces, breaths, addresses and biographies, allocated precisely amongst 4 purported airliners, - plowed these respective self-same planes at 500+ mph into 3 buildings registering varying damages as a result (a fourth building merely following suit on its own a few hours later). With the soft ground completely swallowing up and sealing over the wayward fourth plane, even while various parts of it were left strewn out for miles above ground not far away. Now, there, friends, is a riddle! Besides the utter absurdity of all of that manifestly fictional ridiculously-choreographed narrative, the second biggest problem with it is that there was no reasonable evidence that would satisfy a juror of any Muslims at all having boarded or been on board any such planes, or even that any of said airliners (a specific eminently-identifiable type of aircraft, let alone the particular individual identifiable members of that set specified) ran into or anywhere near any of the fortunately solid and securely-labeled specified buildings. When I tried to Google the simple question, “Are boarding gate cameras at all airports?”, nine of the ten specific links to the “most relevant” articles on the first response page curiously referred to locations in the Far East – China and Japan – and the tenth had something to do with Morocco. So much for that, I thought. But needless to say to a gang of staunch Truthers, no boarding camera footage, if there was any recorded that day, of the airline flights specified were ever offered or even referred to – even if fake – to clearly show whether or not any of the despicable Muslims (or any of variously-listed regular passengers, for that matter) had boarded. The only conceivably germane evidence brought forth was the suitcase allegedly left, for some unknowable reason, in a rental car at Logan (Boston) airport, along with Mrs. Olson’s admittedly bogus cell phone (or was it seat phone?) call from somewhere on high over Pennsylvania. All of which led David Ray Griffin, our stalwart mastermind of 9/11 information, to conclude that there was “no credible evidence of any Middle Eastern hijackers”. Add in the footage from all the dozens of surveillance cameras that we know panned the section of the Pentagon allegedly struck from every angle, all of them confiscated – for keeps. At least some of them, we can assume, would in all likelihood have revealed the truth or falsity of the government’s contention as to what happened there. Prima facie conclusive evidence withheld! Justice denied! And the big piles of massive steel beams from the WTC, practically all removed by orders from the top before investigators could get to them! Damn the Constitution – full speed ahead! Compare all that fantastic dearth of evidence – very much of it willful, the rest simply not – with the local government of Boston’s plea for videos or still photos from everyone in the vicinity of the bombing incident there. The release of blow-ups (if dare I use that term) of the faces of two likely operatives in the deed completes the daunting, breathtaking contrast. Evidence of the prima facie critical or conclusive sort was hidden and kept a secret in the case of the magic-trick distractions concealing the 9/11 bombings, leading to our inescapable presumption, judged as radical, or at least delusionary, by some, that the whole narrative was cooked up or conjured. Meanwhile, evidence of nearly the same sort was today set before the whole world in Boston, with the heartfelt plea, “Who are these mugs?” Now, the latter presiding organ today was not, apparently, the U.S. government, but an agency of an American city. Not proving for a minute that agents within the federal government don’t already know the precise identity of whoever is implicated by those pictures. Just one strange “coincidence” stands out for me concerning this fresh, new, not unlikely false-flag incident and its recent siblings at this point in time: Doesn’t it strike you as passing strange that all, or nearly all, of the most-recent assorted shock events currently convulsing this troubled nation and, more pointedly, its electorate should take place within the radius of a couple of hundred miles of coastline (Hurricane Sandy, Sandy Hook, previously a virtually unimaginable East Coast earthquake, and now this)? In precisely the little corner of the country that, along with California, has been the most resistant to militarization and the emerging U.S. police state? I think the term would be “piling on”. Watch for identities of the young men fingered by the photos – as likely as not, judging from recent history, a case of planting the explosive charges by hypnosis – to find out, very likely, who, in terms of countries or regions, the “free world” is fixing to hit with a violent and cathartic big-brother strangle-hold next. The TV networks’ counsel of fear seems dead-on in this case, mole-hill though it may be. (Or new, magic Himalaya). JH: 4/18/13

Objectivity

Objectivity By James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization # Absolutely nothing is more essential to discovering and spreading truth than objectivity. Objectivity means that whatever is fully proven to me logically, by all evidence available, I will accept as true, whether I like it or not, whether it’s what I expected or not. For the sake of objectivity (the truth seeker’s Holy Grail), I choose not to retain any core beliefs that are impermeable to objective proof or lead-pipe logic applied to irrefutable evidence. Are you with me? If you want to be credible and accepted as reliable, rather than just a “conspiracy theorist” – a mad dog known to mindlessly chase and try to roll any and every car passing by – you must so choose, too. And to help persuade others of the value of your farther-reaching deduction involving 9/11 in particular, you should, all the more so, not go barking after every car or wagon, or even those wobbling on loose wheels, without objective proof in hand. While it’s fine (and no doubt unavoidable) to have a somewhat evidence-based opinion short of final proof in lots of cases, for the sake of everybody, not least yourself, please state it’s your considered opinion. Absolute objectivity is often said to be impossible. If that is true as an objective fact, the intent and effort to attain objectivity is not impossible. Rather it is essential. Unless you want to be regarded, sooner or later, as just one more yahoo, with which the world is already overflowing, and widely avoided by most. That being so, you can do none of us, your fellow humans, any real benefit despite your intentions. So, what factors and habits of mind are the leading deterrents of objectivity? Assumptions, regardless of their source, are one. I, for example, often assume that the Pentagon and Special Forces black budgets are as limitless as their deviousness and dark imaginations, operating under orders of the unitary executive of the NWO. Hence, when an exceptionally bad storm, leaving a weird storm track, or mayhem of whatever kind breaks loose somewhere, they, the usual, all-purpose suspects, must have plotted and done it, I just assume. And my brain – and possibly yours - goes to work inventing motives. Even though I know killer storms, earthquakes, and massive massacres have happened naturally or apart from the NWO for thousands of years and possibly still do. I’ve come close to being burned by this assumption. So, when I’m lacking beyond-reasonable-doubt proof of something, I’ve learned to say: “don’t discount that they might have done it, and here’s why.” And then I look for further evidence, one way or the other. To convincingly state that a report of something, no matter how official or widely accepted, does not add up logically, if it doesn’t, so that something else must have happened instead, is often much easier to substantiate than an alternative scenario. Air-tight proof that the official story of 9/11, for example, is at best a gross fabrication is of course ample and redundant; while positive details of what did happen remain arguable. By shrieking contrast, to pass along a rumor or some yahoo’s fanciful story as if substantiated fact without convincing real evidence to cite is tantamount to spreading disinformation, which it may be. For instance, what happened to the story that both Lanza’s father and that of the Aurora shooter were prime Libor witnesses set to testify? There is nothing the least bit “delusional” or compromising about truth-telling. You don’t have to stretch or invent stuff. It’s for discerning minds only. A second major enemy of objectivity, as a category, is myth. Myths are comfy pillows, backstops, permitting drowsy indulgers to rest and dream their lollypop dreams. Untroubled in their assurance, for instance, that “we are always the good guys, so we know our government would never do such a thing, and that it’s too stupid to think of it anyway.” Or, “the peddlers of outrageous conspiracy theories (those who deviate from the approved script) are just delusional, unpatriotic, uneducated, warped and bitter, enemies of decency, dupes, and fools. End of story: it’s just some bothersome nonsense anyway.” And when one of our former presidents famously lauded, over and over, “people who play by the rules,” I believe he meant our masses who stand in line and wait for orders from headquarters. Not people who question! Myths operate in America (though some seem to be falling away in Europe) as a shielding soap-bubble substitute for courage – the everyday courage to confront objectively. Given the choice, as we have been for a century now, people prefer to take their horror stories sitting down, on screen. But now, even the movie theatres aren’t safe anymore, and we might not have enough time to hide under the seats. Oh, ----! The real problem is not the inability, but the unwillingness to think. It’s no accident that a country that has resorted to rewarding not thinking is down in science and math! So, let’s clean up our act and show America and the world what objectivity really portends as a magic tool for moving beyond this darkest of dark ages! JH: 4/12/13

New PayPal Feature

If you believe in this site and its purpose and message, please contribute to its maintenance. Thank you! -James Hufferd

Marginalization: A Different Explanation

Marginalization: A Different Explanation by James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization _____ Much has been made in our circles of the obvious, upon examination and reflection, encoded wordings and repetition of scripted images and messages beyond straightforward reporting in observations apparently from all sides, via TV and followed up in print, on 9/11/01 and all the 4,000-plus days since, showing no signs of letting up. The best analogy might be of a spider (in this case, a decidedly poison one) spinning out from its own venomous innards a pre-ordained web, not from facts and reality, but from baseless, self-serving lies that would nevertheless be strong enough to add to the world’s centuries-long fabric of carefully-crafted shared civic illusion. The illusion had been, just prior, of the liberty and national self-direction of a free and equal effective common citizenship on one side of a wall or curtain, and the failure and duplicity of ubiquitous lower-class aspirations on the other, with foul genocide and base ignorance in stubbornly sub-human parts all around. Only decent, suitably-rich, properly religious, fair-skinned westerners, preferably Aryans, were fit to run the world and their own lives, with the financial collectivism of wealth exalted, while human and social collectivization, even defensively, of power and influence were demonized – never even to be competed with, but smashed as vermin in all instances. And then, suddenly, the essential enemy, at home and more tellingly overseas, imploded and stood down, and the much-abused plutocrat side was denied its whole organizing rationale. But then, in the stupendous false-flag op of 9/11, its purveyors, once back however shakily in power in America, created a whole new rationale in a single day, though with no (or minimal) real history behind it. The only way to have that new made-up myth of the unspeakably dangerous monster Muslim terrorist arch-enemy take hold and infuse sufficiently the American (and secondarily, the world) mind was to make it fact– to make the myth the news. It, in fact, became The Word, and The Word was God and The Word was With God and swept creatively over the face of the deep. And if you weren’t With It, then YOU were The Enemy! (And people wonder where such tripe comes from!) To even (and especially) the most highly-paid, manifestly smartest, reputedly most-rational spokespersons hired to reinforce The Word by the owners/powers-that-be, the new myth stood completely unaided on its own (and continues to) when necessary. Facts need not be complex or cloudy or difficult to understand at all, in order to be never mentioned on-air and forgotten or ignored entirely when they might contradict The Word, the substance of the newly-forged fabric of national myth. The likes of Rachel Maddow, herself “progressive”(even lesbian), to take in even the influential minority of a certain ilk, and paid perhaps a million or more a year to represent intelligence married with virtue, make perfect messengers to the most dangerous potential defectors. She and her on-air colleagues seem the kind of people we are apt to suppose we could sit down with to commiserate about 9/11 on the side of reason, the ascertainable facts, and the contradictions we recognize. Not so! In fact, the likes of her regularly slip in nuggets such as the offended condemnation recently of a Pennsylvania politician who’s been effectively blocking a national historic site near Shanksville to honor courageous patriots who fought the evil Muslim hijackers (supposedly) on the plane that supposedly crashed there. Even though the ONLY evidence that there were “Middle Eastern hijackers” on any planes that day AT ALL comes from on-board phone calls from Barbara Olson to Ted that even the FBI has officially confirmed never happened. How convenient to forget that in order to keep at least the useful, if baseless, myth of that, the theme of movies and a flurry of fervent speeches, for crying out loud, airborne! Pay her a bonus! And anyone who dares say otherwise, marginalize them to the Lake of Fire forever! And for sure, be sure to never smile at or give an opening to a crocodile (iconoclast) like that! Blacks and Hispanics have been marginalized in America forever, more than for any other reason, because they know the unacceptable-at-all-costs painful and condemning truth about U.S. history and identity first-hand. So do we. Same result. Demographics are changing. JH: 3/31/13

Coming Out: A Neglected Front in Our Struggle

Coming Out - Attacking a Neglected Front in Our Struggle by James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization The Fourth Estate in the U.S., the scribblers and the press - vanguard of the opinion-making professional class - is tantalizingly threading the needle in virtual lockstep on the tenth anniversary of the start of the Iraq War. Their lyric, or spoon-fed script, of the day royally bashes the now publicly-scorned Bush, Jr. administration for swaying the legions of lackeys that committed the country with no less than blatant lies about WMD and wildly misrepresented motives and bogus evidence, producing a rising demand that led to an embarrassingly inept and unproductive major cockpit war in the Middle East. That war effort was mistaken and wrong-headed, to be sure. But far less for the handful of reasons that are being cited than for other, more weighty reasons. For one, the primary, revenge factor was far worse than simply mistaken. It wasn't just that those particular Muslims had not attacked us; in truth, none had. It wasn't that the war was bungled; it was evil and shameful to launch it in the first place, ignoring the fact that there was no real provocation. There wasn't any live WMD to be found - a fact known by the war's perpetrators and well-attested by experts, and ignored before the war was joined. Killing itself is wildly wrong; willful killing of foreign innocents and slaughter of patriots standing up to defend their country and families from invading butchers and intentionally-crazed fiends even worse. Much worse. The war faction got away with that for years only because latent U.S. racism and the brownness of Iraqis kept a sizable otherwise preoccupied plurality from retching and revolting in shame. While it's true that Iraq turned out to be an immediate financial disaster and millstone for the ordinary U.S. citizenry and took government attention away for a decade from important things that needed to get done in this country, the perpetrators and their crossbred friends in the contracting world made out - fittingly - like bandits. And, for them, the only effective constituency, the important things to get done were securing the bulk of the public treasury, both here and abroad, plus the dividends of this country's full borrowing capacity and daylight, violent robbery of control over Iraqi oilfields, all expenses paid. Only something like the most benign ten percent of the whole plethora of lies involved is, not surprisingly, being enunciated now by the public-conditioning sound machine that masquerades as news and commentary for the gullible and lackadaisical public - who already, by the way, know that all of it was one hundred percent rotten. Everybody knows that much now. And, after all, the media's never going to shame the perps and pervs with the vast, clarifying background other ninety percent of the lying, morally weighted. Which is that the sponsors got their all-out mock-revengeful war effort and its funding on a platter and on the tab by staging and carrying out themselves and deceitfully mis-ascribing 9/11, their own personal "New Pearl Harbor", moving heaven and earth and a manure wagon of threats and bribes ever since to keep that hideous deviltry conceiled. But, unlike others, I've never been persuaded that our traitorous Fourth Estate wouldn't do that someday all at once - let fly the investigated truth to land where it may - triggering a sudden majority change of tune (as on gay marriage) by a growing army of elected representatives and public figures, when it no longer takes special courage to come out. Remember Lincoln? I believe I've mentioned him before. He most certainly wasn't going to adopt the abolitionist position and free the slaves as long as it was both a) reversible and b) useless political suicide to do so. But, when public sentiment changed enough to permit it, by george, he did it! The abolitionists themselves had long since given up on him and switched to bitter lampooning and bad-mouthing - sound familiar? Do I feel confident that this scenario will play out again in our time, as it did to bring about other improbable victories, like the publicly-forced ending of the Vietnam War? No. But, here's why it might: First off, the guilty-as-sin elite class is not monolithic. In fact, they're fractured nine ways from Wednesday. We're seeing one yawning chasm of difference splitting them openly with Petraeus' removal, the barking and growling at Chuck Hagel, and the reported purging of the neocons from the defense establishment that he's now overseeing (although the latter may be what they call window-dressing). But, the red ants aren't going to go out of their way forever to protect the black ants - justbecause they're all ants! The second reason it could happen is something we can and should work to bring about. I have long observed that many public thinkers and celebrities - as well as far more of the general public than one might expect - are in full agreement with us in a general consensus as to the cause of and responsibility for 9/11. They just don't bring it up much. The upper-class shadow Truthers don't in order to protect themselves and their sources, the elite funders. But, at least many of them know. And the regular-folks proto-Truthers don't because, who would listen, anyway, and why upset people close to them? But, I would roughly guess that up to six out of ten Americans pretty well know by now. Plenty don't, and we need to keep up our efforts to inform them. But, we also need to work on all of the others who really know what the problem is, both the ordinaries and the wonks. Because, if we could prime and organize all who know to speak up more or less as with one voice - which is basically what happened in each of the historical examples cited, the noise made by that grand chord in unison would register more loudly than any atomic bomb. It might be the loudest sound ever heard. And you can bet the political drones would all hear it. And, if it continued, respond. They'd have to. JH: 3/19/13