Individuals willing to be contacted for information and/or leading groups of activists striving for truth around the crimes of 9-11-2001. To request your name be added to this list, or to change or remove your information, please utilize the Contact form linked at the righthand column.

Sunday, July 24, 2016

James Corbett, Global Research - Hillary Clinton: Global Menace

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Activist Post - Multiple Staged Crises to Force Us to Seek Relief

Potential Crisis Triggers Continue To Pile Up In 2016

TOPICS:Brandon SmithCivil UnrestGlobalist Agenda.

July 20, 2016

crisis triggersBy Brandon Smith

We are a little over half way through 2016 and, at the current rate, it will be a miracle if the year finishes without outright catastrophe in half the nations of the world. Some might call these events “Black Swans,” some might call them completely engineered threats, others might call it all a simple “coincidence” or a tragedy of errors. I stand strictly by the position that most of the dangers we see today have been deliberately escalated, if not strategically implemented.

Here is the problem; international financiers and globalist nut-jobs are clearly operating on a timeline with the end goal of creating enough general chaos to convince the masses that complete centralized authority over every aspect of our lives is preferable to constant fear.

For a more in-depth analysis on the schemes of the elites, see my articles “Are Globalists Evil Or Just Misunderstood” and “Globalists Are Now Openly Demanding New World Order Centralization.”

In order to elicit this kind of thinking from the public, crisis events are required that will cause many human beings to act, for the most part, like rabid animals. How would this be accomplished? Well, what does history tell us about that which inspires people to sometimes sacrifice their moral code or to bow down to tyrants? Usually a loss of necessities is required — including a lack of employment, lack of production, lack of serviceable shelter, lack of ample food and clean water, lack of medical care, lack of overall security and a sense of safety, etc.

The question often arises: “Why would the elites need to create crisis at all; don’t they already have control of the world?”

The answer is no, not yet they don’t, and if you read my recent article “The Reasons Why The Globalists Are Destined To Lose,” you can see why they never will have total control. That said, just because the globalist plan for complete centralization is doomed to fail does not mean they will not do everything in their power to make the attempt.

Changes in mass psychology that might take decades to achieve can be accomplished in only a few short years if the public is placed under the right amount of duress. I find that younger people (and isolated people who spend all their time on the Web) in particular just don’t understand how this works. Look at it this way; you may not think crisis would be all that useful in pushing the globalist agenda forward until you find your family threatened, your children at risk or your parents in dire need. Fear of losing those we love can open the door to great collective evils, even more so than the fear of harm to ourselves.

Those who have no concept of self defense or the will to prepare and fight are the easiest to manipulate in this way. Pacifists are an effortless meal for dedicated despots. Hell, for some folks the simple threat of losing day-to-day comforts can cause them to make terrible choices and support destructive leaders and policies.

Chaos is NOT the end game, it is only a tool by which the elites gain psychological leverage over the masses so that people willingly give up their rights to self determination and hand more power to the establishment.

A perfect example would be the recent Brexit referendum, the effects of which have not even begun to rise to the economic surface yet. In light of this event, numerous political puppets and banking moguls have declared an outright need for financial centralization of all nations in order to avoid a calamity.

Investors have been lured into a false sense of safety as equities do not yet reflect the fiscal downturn taking place in every other sector of the global economy, but time grows short nonetheless. The political can negatively affect the financial and vice versa. Here are just a few of the latest trigger events that are piling up atop an already precarious year…

Italian Banking Crisis

Globalists continue to warn that the effects of the Brexit are coming soon, and that they will bring frightening instability. The latest warning comes again from the IMF, which argues that in the wake of the Brexit a banking crisis in Italy is now imminent and will initiate a “global contagion” in markets. The IMF is not wrong – probably because it had a hand in creating the crisis in the first place.

Italy is the third largest economy in the EU. Current estimates project at least $400 billion in toxic debts tied to Italy’s insolvent banks (this obviously does not include the bulk of derivatives). The stock of Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena (MPS), the world’s oldest bank and Italy’s most vulnerable lender, has dropped by a staggering 43 percent. Most of the EU is inexorably chained to Italian finance through various debt obligations, bond holdings, long term investments, etc. A breakdown in Italy would indeed be a “Lehman moment” for Europe.

In response, the Italian government and the Italian banking sector is seeking taxpayer bailouts from the EU under extraneous circumstances, but EU officials are questioning whether or not this is even legal under EU charter.

They are also hoping that international banks like JP Morgan will successfully form a bailout response for distressed Italian assets and save Italian banks from a hard landing.

It is doubtful that any bailout plan will be enough to stall the shock wave from an Italian bank crisis. I do not believe the elites even intend to defuse such a crisis. With Italy’s own constitutional referendum coming this fall, a political shakeup may result. If a banking disaster is mixed into this shift, the potential for Italy to exit the EU becomes more plausible. A refusal by the EU to save Italian banks would seal the deal.>br/>
In my pre-Brexit articles outlining why I believed the Brexit vote would pass, I predicted that numerous instabilities in the global economy would be allowed to turn volatile and that the Brexit would be blamed for nearly all of them. Not surprisingly, the Italian finance minister is already placing the blame for Italy’s impending bank implosion on the Brexit vote.

This is the economic event that no one in the mainstream is paying much attention to. Again, as long as stocks remain in the green, the mainstream is oblivious to the underlying dangers. By the time equities begin to plummet, it will be too late for most people to do much to hedge their bets or prepare.

“Failed” Coup In Turkey

Maybe you thought 2016 was already getting weird, but this ugly party is just beginning. In what amounted to a half-day coup against Turkish president Recep Erdogan, Turkey went from corrupt cronyism to outright fascism overnight.

I am not so sure that this short-lived coup actually “failed;” in fact, I think it achieved exactly what it was supposed to achieve. I am not surprised in the slightest that some believe that Erdogan fabricated the entire conflict in order to provide an excuse to root out his political opponents. The Turkish government has targeted at least 50,000 people so far, including judges, teachers, and political opposition, all in the name of combating “treason.” Erdogan has been sliding into ruin for years with failed policies and an increasing penchant for human rights and free speech violations and now he has free rein to go full totalitarian.

That said, I think the claims of an Erdogan false flag are missing the bigger picture.

First, the coup was clearly staged. Anyone who knows anything about successful coups in history knows that you either imprison or kill the existing leadership of a government before you try to take it over militarily. Reports indicate that military insurgents had Erdogan’s plane in their sights and could have easily turned him into a cloud of flaming vapor, but for some reason did not fire.

My instincts told me upon first hearing of the fleeting momentum of the coup that the whole event was not really about Erdogan. Rather, the event was about NATO, or a rationale for dividing NATO and weakening the West. Rather predictably, Erdogan’s government is now blaming the U.S. in particular for the coup attempt, as the Obama administration and the U.N. warn of civil rights violations by Erdogan. John Kerry has openly suggested removing Turkey from NATO membership.

At this time, Erdogan has allowed U.S. military operations at Incirlik Air Base to continue, but the prospect remains that this is a temporary condition.

It is interesting that as the situation develops it is becoming obvious that whether the coup succeeded or failed the end result would be a rationalization for Turkey to break ranks with NATO and, in particular, America. Turkey is a vital pivot point for NATO in dealing with the Middle East and Russia. To lose Turkish aid would mean a considerable weakening of NATO operations and open a path to more volatile confrontation between Eastern and Western powers. Take note that no matter the ultimate outcome of the coup fiasco, the most probable result will be a Turkish break from the West. If the latest coup is exposed as an Erdogan “false flag,” this process will progress very quickly.

I will be watching this situation carefully over the next few weeks, but I suspect that tensions between Erdogan and the U.S. are slated to expand and that Erdogan is about to go full-despot with human rights violations of the worst kind. I also suspect that Erdogan will begin drafting proposals for greater cooperation with Russia in the near term.

The instability in Turkey is an advantage for the globalists. They can use it to undermine NATO operations if they wish. They can flood the EU with even MORE refugees and blame Turkey in the process. They can even help their Frankenstein monster, ISIS, by allowing Turkey to shut down U.S. operations out of Incirlik (as if the U.S. government had any intention of actually stopping ISIS anyway). This could be used as an impetus for a resurgence of ISIS activities.

To summarize, a crisis in Turkey is not only good for Erdogan, it is also good for the globalists. Watch for this trigger event to continue mutating.

Race War In The U.S.

I have covered extensively the efforts by globalists, and George Soros specifically, to create open wounds in the American social structure and divide the public along racial lines. This has been done by promoting, and in some cases funding, operations of social justice groups (cultural Marxists) and black racist organizations. Black Lives Matter has so far been the vehicle Soros has used to lure useful idiots into championing a race war that has no basis in reality.

While there is in fact a legitimate cause for concern over the militarization of state police, police abuses are in no way limited to any single race. I wrote about the best possible solution to constitutional violations by police organizations in my article “The ‘Thin Blue Line’ Serves No Purpose.” In it, I outlined why state police, funded by federal cash, should not exist all and that their duties should be by taken over by elected sheriff’s offices and neighborhood watches. This removes the gasoline from the fire and undermines attempts by cultural Marxists to incite race violence.

Of course, this will never happen. Both Republicans and Democrats are calling for even MORE federalization of police in response to the continued shootings of random LEO\s by black activists. The Democrats want more federalization because they think it will reign in violent cops. The Republicans want more federalization because they think it will reign in violent BLM activists. Notice that no other solution is being offered other than more federal presence on American streets.

Keep in mind that the shooting of random police officers is becoming an active trend and it is only going to get worse as we close in on the November elections. Watch for officers to be killed not only while on duty, but also while off duty, perhaps even in their homes.

The goal here is to create an excuse for martial law without necessarily declaring martial law outright. That is to say, the government will enact the conditions of martial law incrementally. This will likely include anonymity of LEO identities — meaning ski masks, hidden badge numbers and zero public accountability, all in the name of “protecting police lives.” Groups like BLM and the social justice cultists that exploit them as a weapon are not a real threat to the public overall and could be crushed in an instant by an angry white majority and militarized police unrestrained by the Constitution. But this is not the point.

The militarization and federalization of the police will end in totalitarianism in the U.S. if it receives wide support by conservatives, or widespread civil war if it does not. Police need to refuse to act in an unconstitutional manner even in the face of violence directed against them, otherwise, they risk starting a fight with liberty groups as well. Black Lives Matter would be the least of their worries at that point.

Quick Mention – 28 Page 9/11 Report Release: If you want my in-depth look at the growing rift between Saudi Arabia and the U.S., read my article “One More Casualty Of The 9/11 Farce – The Petrodollar.” I am giving this a quick mention because we have yet to hear the full Saudi response to the release of this report. The original threat was that they would dump their U.S. treasury holdings and depeg their currency from the dollar. This would officially end the petro-status of the dollar and eventually end the dollar’s world reserve status as well. I believe that if the Saudis do take this action, they will do it quietly before bond markets and oil markets realize what is happening. It is likely that a Saudi break from the U.S. will occur quickly in the event of a Trump presidency.

Quick Mention – South China Sea Build Up: A prelude to WWIII? Maybe, maybe not. China and the U.S. have been sparring politically over the South China Sea for some time. An international ruling has argued that China has no legitimate claims to the waters nor any territorial history. This has led to greater tensions. The latest build up of naval units in the region is concerning, but there has not yet been a true catalyst to instigate a war. This is another scenario which may not materialize until next year, if it materializes at all.

The overall purpose of these events, I believe, is first to conjure mass confusion. The globalists are turning up the heat on the citizenry much faster than ever before, and it is time to take stock of our position and response. The best defense, as I have always stated, is personal preparedness and self-sufficiency, organization with friends and family, then organization of the like-minded within your neighborhood and if possible your town. Most people are self-isolated and thus weak in their defensive position. Anyone effectively organized will have far reaching advantages in the midst of social breakdown. Anyone who is organized with solid planning will become the point to which everyone else gravitates. You can either be a pillar of strength or a victim, it is your choice.

Rest assured, there is more shock and awe to come in 2016. Now is the time to prepare if you have not done so already.

You can read more from Brandon Smith at his site If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.

You can contact Brandon Smith at:

Saturday, July 16, 2016

Thursday, July 14, 2016




Adel, IA, USA
July 14, 2116

Although I am not authorized by anyone, I perceive that what I am about to write faithfully represents the thoughts and reasoned beliefs of a vast majority of participants worldwide in the so-called 911 Truth community. And I ask members of that community who receive this message to please forward it on to any contacts you may have in France or anywhere else in Europe.

We stand in solidarity with you in your current time of shock, grief, and testing. The mass-homicidal act that took place on the promenade in Nice today was truly an act of barbarous terrorism, there is no doubt about that. However, despite the fact that the driver and any actual accomplices are, predictably, identified as representing ISIS, al-Qaeda, or some other “autonomous” Middle Eastern-based terrorist group, either organically or by inspiration, please let none of us ever close our minds to the established likelihood by now that the real perpetrators are NATO and/or U.S. “security agencies”, either utilizing the henchmen and personnel of the Middle Eastern-based or affiliated local terror cells they (the U.S. and NATO) themselves have established, or alternatively acting in a “false flag” capacity, attributing this, as with earlier notorious attacks in Paris, Brussels, and elsewhere, to autonomous “Islamic” groups.

It is our belief, founded on both evidence and solid precedent dating back to the GLADIO attacks falsely blamed on communist cells in the years following World War II, that the Islamic communities in France and elsewhere in Europe are by and large innocent of these atrocities and deserve to be treated not with suspicion, but with respect and friendship, as victims and fellows.

The likely purpose of this attack today, as was the case with the previous attacks mentioned, is to instill fear and directed animosity in order to gain or bolster the material and marshal support, willing or reluctant, of the French and other European nations for U.S.-led plans and military operations against declared enemies in the Middle East and elsewhere, namely Russia. Please always consider first the likelihood that the latest terror attack when it happens is such a “false-flag” psychological operation. And please spread the word as widely as you can that citizens of the west and elsewhere ought not permit their government leaders or media to falsely direct them into very probably misguided hostilities or willingly give up their rights and liberties for the sake of hostilities against false enemies who are unjustly blamed.

Listed below are three leading references to consult for the evidence to support the claim that there is ample precedent for concluding the attack today in Nice was carried out under the direction of NATO or the U.S. security state. My own purpose is simple: If we cannot be fooled, we cannot be misled.

1) Kevin Barrett, et al, WE ARE NOT CHARLIE HEBDO (2015)
2) Kevin Barrett, et al, ANOTHER FRENCH FALSE FLAG? (2016)

With very best regards,

James Hufferd, Ph.D., Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization (

Wednesday, July 13, 2016


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization


Now that it is, or should be, abundantly clear once again to all that U.S. politics is nothing but a branch of professional wrestling, choreographed maybe not from the git-go exactly, but at least step-by-step, or round-by-round to get the result desired on high – our choice of the despised – we all know inside just about what to expect in our collective lives – more of the same. Which means, with respect to rights and freedoms, less and less permitted daily as New World Order tightening of control continues. It means still more mind-control using a continuing dazzling flurry of false-flag psi-ops, large and small, backed by omnipresent wall-to-wall disinformation, to drive us by creating and dashing demands and convince us of whoever knows what next, mostly boiling down to pervasive fear, ever-increasing war footing and expense, and dashed expectations of anything else or anything to say about any of it. With more of your income going into their accounts, enjoy the non-stop circus that is substituted for life in hermetically closed-off America.

People pointedly ask me, not frequently, but enough to expect an answer – why don’t I stick to discussing aspects and evidence of 9/11? My answer is that if 9/11 was simply a one-off, if inside agents did that awful thing to us once, on one day, and never again, then concentrating merely on the events of that one unbelievable day that most of us remember vividly would certainly be warranted, if difficult. Difficult because, through the course of literally by now hundreds of usually short articles, at the pace of a new article every couple of weeks, it would become increasingly hard to find fresh aspects and angles to usefully discuss.

But, since 9/11 definitely has a very much wider context and a legacy and still spawns frequent follow-on aftershocks, mostly smaller events usually similar in purpose and effect, what we have to confront and try mightily to overcome, to overthrow, is a whole endless syndrome, a distinguishing modus operandi of those capable and intent on exercising raw power to get their way, by serially bamboozling and fleecing us via deceit and a duly shocking level of fear and revulsion. (But note that people are answering less and less now, “But they wouldn’t do that,” as people are finally realizing that “Oh yes, they would.”)

So, “this has got to stop” has become my message to you – and it had better be your message and mission, too, if any of us want a future of increasing freedom and an exit from our “brave new world” existence. “But, how?” you ask. I’m working on it. You work on it, too – and let’s spread the word as far as we can. – that the U.S. has set up ISIS to scare and move us, and it’s all a put-up. Don’t believe it.”

Meanwhile, the measure of rebellion that I’ve noted lately, in the U.S. and beyond, has mostly been absorbed and controlled with ease by the system, and the measure of crackdown and renewed increase of the causes of our grievances is nigh. Countless cynics, as usual, keep saying (as if they knew) that the people already know what’s happening and are just too soft/dumb to seriously rebel.

I say, that depends. If (when) it comes to the point at which our necessities for merest survival are not only threatened, but start to unravel, we – every last one of us – will rebel. And our hopeless corrupted organs of governance will respond on our behalf, because we will leave them no choice if they are going to survive.

I cite as my unlikely text for this conclusion an easy read by Andrew Wice, To the Last Drop: A Novel of Water, Oppression, and Rebellion (2008), in which New Mexico and Texas are impelled to go to war with each other over rights to the last precious trickle of water left unexploited, unappropriated, and thus remaining between the two of them.

Substituted for water, lots of things that could and likely will run out as current trends of abuse, by the state and licensed bidders and court favorites, continue – food, electricity, fuel, TV access, malevolent medication, crumbling travel means and routes, cost of living, permitted and accumulated contaminants and poisons, maybe purposeful misdirection, availability of savings and pledged entitlements, etc., etc. – you get the point. And what people en masse will do when the menacing conditions in any or all of those sensitive areas begin to occur – as they will given present trends – I don’t know. But we won’t do nothing. We’ll do what we need to do. And they do fear us to the extent of making scary preparations.

And so, I am more than tempted to say, “Bring it on! Let’s have it out!”

JH: 6/13/16

Sunday, July 10, 2016

RMNRR - The REAL Dirt !?

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room


The first "FBI analyst" 4chan thread in edited, simplified Q&A format

Posted By: MrFusion [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 6-Jul-2016 16:34:12

In Response To: CGI: Purported FBI Insider says that the Clinton Foundation is where the REAL dirt is!! (Susoni)

This is derived from the following:

It omits comments/questions which the "FBI agent" did not respond to. Apologies for any errors/omissions. It took a couple of hours to put this together so I am not contemplating doing the other threads. If this guy is fake then he's really really good.

Transcript start:
I am a person with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case. I will answer as many questions as I can without giving too much away.

Will the Hillary get Pregnant again?
A: Hopefully not.

Q: Why are you on 4chan on a Friday night?
A: Sent home, awaiting word about the shitstorm Lynch just caused.

Q: Will she be indicted?
A: There is intense pressure for us not to do so. I am posting from a position of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders. There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down. People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is. Whether she will be or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.

Q: What reason have we to believe you?
A: None. It's better that way.

Q: What are they going to talk to her about tomorrow?
A: Legal is asking preliminary questions about whether or not she has been coached (she has) and setting up the general line of questioning. I am a high level analyst though, so my job is only to look at her records.

Q: "People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is" - can you elaborate on that ?
A: The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the CF. Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.

Q: "the entire government to be brought down" - I very much doubt this.
A: She had SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war.

Q: Let me guess "it's real deep guys I swear! I just can't tell you about it because it's secret!" You're a liar, friend.
A: Believe what you will.

Q: How long before you tragically shoot yourself in the back of the head from at least three feet away from two different angles, or suffer from an ulcer that decapitates you with a knife? Because people with dirt on the Clintons have a shocking tendency to jump off tall buildings and board faulty aircraft.
A: We are all worried about that.

Q: Would you support me killing her if you fail? I don't trust you, so I am preparing myself to take her out if need be.
A: Killing HRC would not cause this problem to go away. The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imagine as a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people. Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece -albeit a big piece - of this massive shitstorm.

Q: Do you think the DOJ will protect Hillary like Holder did for Petraeus?
A: The DOJ is most likely looking to save itself. Find everyone involved in the Clinton Foundation, from its donors to its Board of Directors, and imagine they are all implicated.

Q: You don't agree that a message has to be sent by the people to protect the sanctity of the position? I do prefer the peaceful way, 2bh. But it's the constant fear you're going to fuck it up that grips me.
A: My opinion is the entire government is guilty of treason, which is why HRC's death would not cease the investigation or prevent further scandals. Many, many people are involved.

Q: Will Comey resign if there is enough evidence to indict but is forced not to indict? Was Lynch saying that she will accept any recommendation from the FBI really means she knows they are not going to indict?
A: There already is enough to indict. Comey has been trying to stall because he does not want to face the Clinton Machine, as well as the rest of Washington D.C. But this case would explode into a million other cases if fully brought to light, and then we would be one agency competing against the entire government and a hoard of other interests. It is a very tense and uncomfortable position. What Lynch is saying is she will accept whatever they do and make her determination as she will. Nothing about her responsibilities has changed, she is simply trying to keep her hide intact.

Q: If you don't prosecute, what with her blatantly admitting to breaking 4 laws on the Rose Garden, what message will that send to the public?
A: We have no power to prosecute, we simply hand over the data to the DOJ for them to prosecute. And we do not have the authority to hand over all of the data because of its sensitivity. And some of the data will lead into other cases of corruption.

Q: Will we really see mass resignations and leaks if nothing happens? Or is that all just bluster and hearsay?
A: Foreign powers are in possession of some of the documents we have analyzed, because they were hacked from the Clinton server. Trump has some files as well, and likely plans to leak them and use them to his advantage soon. The leaks will have to be made in a non-transparent fashion.

Q: I'm aware, but if you recommend to prosecute, she said she would. If you don't, public trust will be eroded at this point. Too much is out in the open.
A: If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire government is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of SAPs which would obliterate national security.

Q: And what happens when Vlad releases all the emails? And all the information he's dug up from them?
A: I am not sure, but some of my war strategy buddies are estimating a high probability that Russia will leak all of the info they have to the world, since Clinton wants to go to war with them and they have no desire to be in conflict with the US.

Q: "If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire government is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of SAPs which would obliterate national security." Most people have suspected this for a while. What do you think will happen if you don't recommend? Not just at home, but what will other nations do with the information that is already out there?
A: If we do not recommend, it will look like a cover-up and Trump will use the perception to bolster his message. I did work in PsyOps once, and Trump's use of confirmation bias is legendary.

Q: Answer this: Is clinton a commie yes or no?
A: No.

Q: How long until we know whether you are going to recommend?
A: Impossible to determine at this point. We could do it tomorrow if we wanted. There are too many political players involved.

Q: What's the deal with Bill's health? Just old age or something else?
A: Bill Clinton will likely die this year.

Q: So can you give an estimate to let me know when you guys will make your decision? It's gotta happen soon, because if you don't prosecute, you are potentially, giving the keys to the white house to the most corrupt politician ever.
A: Impossible to say. The entire government is corrupt. No one is clean, not even Trump.

Q: In the near future, there will be several books, and a movie by Dinesh Desouza coming out and they claim they will bring her down with this leaks. Will these have any affect on whether she's indicted?
A: They will only have an effect on public opinion, which will help her get indicted. But I assure you, Dinesh D'Souza has nothing on her. The only person coming close is Jerome Corsi. He is putting the pieces together (loosely).

Q: Tell me the dirt on Trump.
A: Trump has donated to the Clinton Foundation in the past, though for fairly innocuous things like building permits and such. He is smart, so his tracks are covered well. But if any prosecutor wants to go very in-depth Trump would be brought on bribery charges. He could easily get out of them, but he would be charged nonetheless.

Q: What do you think of this "Sources say that The investigation will conclude shortly" meme?
A: Mainstream media is shit. Who cares what they say. They are attempting to distract by putting the focus on HRC's emails and not the Foundation.

Q: So why are you hesitating? If you recommend to prosecute, you will at least have the perception of being trustworthy to the US public. If you don't, a lot of people are going to know the jig is up, and the US has lost all shred of integrity. Ditto for other countries. Why are you guys even debating letting the cancer spread? Why are you considering allowing the corruption to spread to you?
A: Your moral inclinations may look good on the internet, but in real life the situation is complicated. You cannot possibly ask the entire government to prosecute itself. Lynch has also given to the Foundation, and has many ties to many people she should not. Remember that Bill appointed her. She is a great prosecutor, but she did not get where she is by simply being good at her job.

Q: How do we fix this? and by we i mean you guys lmao
A: We have our hands tied. My message to you and everyone on this board is do not get distracted by Clinton's e-mails. Focus on the Foundation. All of the nightmarish truth is there. The e-mails will pale in comparison.

Q: In Trump's case, isn't that just an instance of the hazing/initiation into the elite by providing them with the ability to blackmail him if he goes off reservation?
A: I do not know of Trump's record, but from the case he definitely knew to limit his exposure and make it only look like a donation.

Q: Would a trump presidency better for shit like this ? I assume that he would allow you to persecute[sic] her?
A: If Trump wins, HRC will be prosecuted. I have heard rumors Christie will be his AG, and Michael Flynn will be his VP pick.

Q: Give a specific example of large scale corruption or collusion.
A: Saudi Arabia visits and donations to the CF. Russian Uranium fiasco. HRC and the Israel lobby, the Council on Foreign Relations. AIPAC. The list is endless.

Q: Why bother, then? If you can tell that your boss and your boss's boss are afraid to do their jobs, what's the point? Why not half ass it, enjoy a fat government paycheck, and cover your own ass when it inevitably falls apart?
A: My bosses have the benefit of being in the limelight. Their disappearances or silences would be accompanied by questions. Mine would not.

Q: Stop LARPing and give us something to work with, some good concrete examples.
A: I am providing as much as I can.

Q: If this isn't all some fanfiction, then this is a massive bomb that the FBI needs to carefully handle if they choose to recommend to prosecute.
A: Correct.

Q: How deep is Obama involved in all of this?
A: Impeachment-level involved.

Q: Does she kill people?
A: People have a way of dying around her.

Q: must be how he's [Trump] made so many predictions about brussels and the like, he has bought special access into what's really going on with the global war on terror.
A: Trump has very good people advising and leaking to him.

Q: We know. And by not prosecuting, you are giving these countries leverage over the US. This is the option you are discussing when you discuss not prosecuting, and you know it. In order to not cause an upheaval lasting months or years by cutting out the cancer, you are discussing letting the US die quietly.
Q: Fuck you for not doing your duty to the people, you jaded amoral fucks. You've blown what little trust I had left that there were still decent patriots left in the government. You fuckers are gonna let the biggest, most corrupt cunt take the highest office in the land. You think that won't bring this country down? Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you.

A: I will put it to you this way: You have three choices,
(A) turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war, the civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our government, and a civil war begins.
(B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of public opinion, so the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash.
(C) you do nothing and watch the unstable political climate to gauge how you will respond.
I am confident if Trump wins she will be going to jail.

Q: If the FBI doesn't recommend to indict, what kind of reaction should we expect from within the FBI, will anyone resign?
A: Comey will likely resign in any case. FBI is being very quiet for a reason, most of us want to keep our jobs.

Q: Is Snowden tied up in all this somehow?
A: Snowden has nothing to do with any of this.

Q: Is this election a clever ploy by Obama to have a VP of his choosing become the president? Indict Hillary, and the VP takes over. And Trump might be a threat to this plan, hence all these attacks.
A: Possibly. I don't know for sure.

Q: How accurate is this copypasta, OP? [an image of another thread] Spot-on analysis? Or fanfiction-tier?
A: Obama and HRC do hate each other. HRC hates black people and Obama dislikes recklessness. As far as the investigation, some details are correct. As to the outcome, no one knows.

Q: How many of us are on the FBI watchlist?
A: Truthfully, not many. The FBI is rather fond of /pol/. We study more than we investigate.

Q: I still don't get how snuffing her doesn't end the existential investigation crisis. People would just cheer it and go about their day as they elect Trump, what's the problem? CF can be dealt with when Trump cleans house.
A: The problem is with the entire government. HRC is one component of that government.

Q: Dinesh D'souza's new movie will address the Foundation. Right?
A: Most likely.

Q: At bare minimum, you need to do B. If you can't at least make examples of people, the existence of the FBI is pointless. Start with the most corrupt, like Clintion (and, I presume Feinstein), and each year, choose 3-5 new people with any level of power to indict. Do this until people start retiring. Don't RICO the entire federal government. You have the option to do it slowly, so do it slowly.
A: But if we do it slowly, people like you will get mad that we are not working fast enough.

Q: Can you tell us more about the SAPs and were the classified information sent via those compromised too? Also is Obama tied to CF in any way?
A: All I can tell you about the SAPs is HRC had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors. Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason. Obama is loosely tied to the CF, but much more tied in with the same people who donate to the CF.

Q: "(A) turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war, the civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our government, and a civil war begins." So we can expect them not only fucking around really hard in the middle east but elsewhere too? I assume Obama also has considerable influence on the EU and tries to guide them to war with russia (or at least hillary does). How much is George Soros involved in all of this?
A: Russian borders, Ukraine, everywhere NATO is, the South China Sea, the Phillipines, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Africa. Soros is at the heart of all of this.

Q: "(A) turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war, the civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our government, and a civil war begins." Sounds good to me. Man the fuck up and let slip the dogs of war. If you're as deep as you claim to be then you know that this is necessary to clean out the filth in our governments. There are no other options left other than bloodshed. Will you stand by and watch as the world falls into the grips of tyrants? Or will you fight for freedom? Those are the only questions you need to ask yourself at this point.
A: If it comes down to it, I would fight. But most of us are of the opinion that HRC will not be president, and having Trump in office makes our job that much easier. But right now we have to carefully wade through the mud.

Q: Why did BC and LL meet on the plane?
A: As I stated before, BC likely wanted LL to focus on the e-mail server and shy away from prosecuting the foundation.

Q: Could the release of this information cause a Civil War in the USA? Leak it. Do it. The day of the rope is nigh.
A: Yes.

Q: so that means she will try to assassinate Corsi. What happens if she succeeds?
A: We will go to war with Russia and possibly China if she wins.

Q: I'm not advocating for truth for truth's sake. Option B is the only acceptable scenario, and it needs to be done so that Trump can sweep in and clear the entire establishment of corruption. That is what you are being given the chance to do. If you fail in this, you doom us to a second Rome. Everyone already knows and suspects option A. The patriots in the deep state need to hang this shit over Washington's head and force them to do the right thing.
A: We are working on option B. [(B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of public opinion, so the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash.]

Q: What can I do?
A: Post about HRC everywhere you can. Focus on the Foundation. Do not let her e-mail server be the sole focus of media attention. Follow the Foundation. Her e-mails are a small bite compared to the CF.

Q: To be honest, assuming it's not all a ruse, this would be a good opportunity for us to fire up our twatters and start asking some hard questions about the clinton foundation publicly. The more pressure the better. The last thing I want is for everything to go back to normal for these people.
A: You should be doing this immediately.

Q: WHAT? /POL/ IS LIKED BY THE FBI? Elaborate please?
A: /pol/ is an amalgamation of minds from various geographic and demographic factions. We study very intensely the ideas which emanate and gain prominence on the board, as well as which ideas other organizations try to promote which ultimately get defeated (JIDF, for example, is highly unsuccessful as making /pol/ pro-israel). And most of us just enjoy the posts in general. We like to see how close to the truth everyone is. And we occasionally let our true nature slip.

Q: Can the FBI pay me to shitpost?
A: No.

Q: Didn't Obama push to have the case postponed until 2018 as well?
A: There is talk of it. I do not know where the order came from.

Q: "Obama and HRC do hate each other. HRC hates black people." WTF man, keep that shit quiet. You'll gain her votes here by saying that.
A: Blacks are violent and generally impulsive, but they are not all bad. And they can be, for lack of a better term domesticated. Thomas Sowell has made note of this.

Q: George Soros involved in this?
A: He is the kingpin.

Q: Any hard evidence Hillary sold weapons and favors from the State Department for cash to our enemies?
A: Weapons, favors, intelligence, and people.

Q: "Bill Clinton will likely die this year." And here's why. [posts a screen cap of a comment from elsewhere claiming that Hillary is slowly poisoning Bill to gain voter sympathy when he dies in the Fall.]
A: More likely of natural causes.

Q: Why not go big? Is Obama actually secretly Osama with his beard shaven?
A: Obama is a liberal atheist who is willingly associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. Stephen Coughlin's book, while not totally accurate, does shine light in the right direction.

Q: [A Canadian commenter] From what you're saying, there's no easy way of actually keeping the lid on this. It sounds like it's reached too many eyes and ears now, and is only going to reach more. Whether you want it or not, I think you FBI guys need to full hog on this. We're talking about the assured death of the republic if you don't, rather than the maybe-death of it if you do.
A: Canada has no business telling us how to run intel. Trudeau makes you all look like fools, and already his intel departments are coming to us for help doing fuck everything.

Q: Do you think Trump is a plant by Clinton to try to assure her a victory? Or was that theory all nonsense?
A: Trump is not a Clinton plant. He believes they are disgusting animals.

Q: What did the foundation do???? Please elaborate.
A: Sold influence, intel, favors, and people to anyone willing to pay.

Q: See, and this is the problem with Washington today. You swear to defend the Constitution, which means protecting the liberties that it guarantees the American people. But here the deep state is, contemplating allowing the outright subversion and corruption of the government because muh existing order of things. If the corruption is as bad as you claim, then the half of these Senators and Congressmen and possibly even the President have subverted American democracy. If they are indeed traitors, then you would have an obligation go take care of it. I don't care how it's done. The American military is one of the few I'd trust to transition us until we can elect new leaders.
A: If leaking data en mass destroys my country, we betray the country. If we do nothing, we betray the country. I am not disagreeing with you. I am saying the situation is more complicated when you are inside, and you do not have the breadth of info that I have that would make your eyes fall out of your skull if you knew what all was going on.

Q: Is it time to buy a gun?
A: Yes.

Q: What does SAP stand for?
A: Special Access Programs.

Q: Did you just name the jew?
A: The Nose knows.

Q: so, given that there is a claimed risk of external and internal war if the extent of the government treason is revealed, was getting caught part of their plan?
A: They are not big guys.

Q: With Bernie, around the time Clinton clinched the delegates he had a meeting with Obama and came out smiling. Anything suspicious about that given what you are privy to?
A: Bernie is staying in hoping Clinton will be indicted or forced to recuse herself from the race. We cannot know what will happen atm.

Q: Do we have any real reason to believe this person guys? I've been lurking and I just want to believe so bad. But it would be so easy for this to be top tier trolling...right?
A: If you dig hard into the foundation and make it the sole point of your focus, you will remember this thread when the truth is revealed.

Q: Why would she drag us to war ? In what ways that benefits her? Also, can you post any proof that youre legit?
A: It benefits her because her donors have paid for it. I do not want to post any information about me or where I am, because if any hint got out that I posted anything, I would be fired and blacklisted. Possibly killed.

Q: What are the chances of you guys not doing (B) but just doing (A)? Maybe have a redo and flip a coin or something.
A: (A) is not going to happen. Maybe if Trump gets elected.

Q: The deck has been stacked with obummers picks, so it might not be as good a plan as it might seem [referring to another comment about a military coup]. What do you know about admiralty law being imposed on the people and the usurpation of common law? A: Not likely to happen. If you remember the post by the red team planner, his analysis was spot-on. [not sure what this is referring to, perhaps another thread?]

Q: Then start with the Kingpins. The Clintons, and Soros would be enough to let everyone else know that you aren't fucking around.
A: I admire your spirit.

Q: [about William Sowell] the faggot that compared trump to hitler? I used to respect him before that.
A: Sowell has documented that Blacks were actually integrating decently into American society before the welfare state began.

Q: What's your guys opinion on meme magic? Kekkism? How does Obama feel about the recent Chicago Scanner threads (thanks for ruining that btw, fun-haters) and the light they shine on his 'fair city'?
A: I am not religious, so I ahve no opinion on kek. But meme magic is very real, in the sense that a thought large enough to gain traction with enough minds will manifest in external reality. That's why confirmation bias works, and why Trump has used it to his advantage.

Q: What the fuck is a special access program? a computer program? or is it like a full nuclear kit thing like in movies? can you tell us what they do?
A: A Special Access Program is an intelligence program classified above top-secret. They are held on closed servers at secret locations. The only way to get one is if you are specifically read on to a program, have a need to know, then you must physically go to a location and pass through several layers of security to even look at the program. A good example in non-classified terms would be the locations and operations of our intelligence operatives around the globe, or our missile silo locations.

Q: Any info on Sid Blumenthal? What is he doing now?
A: Blumenthal is attempting to get dirt on and strategize against Trump.

Q: Is Soros an ideologue or a profiteer? He seems a bit old to be the latter. What countries are least tainted by corruption in your opinion? Or is it the standard huffpo top 10 lists like iceland/NZ etc.
A: Ideologue. Believes he and his cohorts are the answer to ending all world wars. Todd Huizinga's book The New Totalitarian Temptation reveals the mindset quite adequately.

Q: Where does Soros stand in all of this?
A: Soros funds, instructs, and influences every layer of US government. right down to the tax code.

Q: Should I be using Linux or Windows if I am to be making a twitter account and start digging into the foundation? Also what is with the North American Union that has been proposed by Obama?
A: It does not matter, any agency can find any computer working right now. What you have to do is get lost in the noise. Do not do anything out of your ordinary behavior and you will be fine.

Q: How do I adequately dig in the CF and help prevent it from being forgotten? I'm about to start googling after I post this comment but I feel like that's naive. A: Promote and discuss it everywhere. Ask questions. Read the news on it. Post articles everywhere. Pirate Jerome Corsi's book (so people can't say I am shilling) because he does have some things right. Q: Is the FBI in this case then entirely pro Trump I assume? Does she have every single media outlet in America in her hands? How strong is Angela Merkel involved in all of this ? (Or germany in general).
A: Most of us are pro-Trump. HRC hates that Trump makes the media profitable, so they have to keep covering him. Germany is not involved. Merkel likes HRC though.

Q: If you guys were able to get Nixon, why not Clinton?
A: Nixon wasn't nearly as reckless.

Q: How much does Loretta Lynch know about this? Does she realize that this is much bigger than Hillary, or is she somewhat ignorant about the scope of this?
A: Lynch has an idea, but if she gets any more info she will have to either recuse herself or prosecute. Remember, if too much information is given it violates national security law and people have to back away.

A: If BC dies it may help her, but I doubt it. The server makes her look corrupt af.

Q: Simply put. Soros owns tavistock. Tavistock owns the government. Enjoy.
A: Someone is on to something.

Q: Nah I get you, I'm just signalling the fuck out of this to get people reading to consider alternatives. And what do you mean "Destroy the country"? If you destroy the federal government, state governments will step in to fill the void temporarily until new elections or a Constitutional convention can be held to lawfully change the form of the Federal government. Yeah, shit will go south for a while. But it won't be the absolute end of the world.
A: Revolutions are much longer and more violent than you think. And if a civil war breaks out, foreign powers will immediately get involved, prolonging any conflict.

Q: do you know about UFO's
A: Yes.

Q: In the sap wiki, the sec of state is given access to sap. So in what way did she broke the law?
A: Sec. CAN have access. That does not mean he/she WILL. SAP is granted on a need to know basis, and HRC did not have any need to know any of the programs on her server.

Q: Did Hitler escape? Do you get to play with guns with giggle switches? What theory are we right about?
A: Hitler: I do not know. I have a normal firearm. Correct theories: Huge Jewish influence, Soros as a puppet master, red team planner. You would have to ask specifically.

Q: I'm just a lowly little person who wants to live a simple, happy, and peaceful life in a country I love. Any chance of this happening?
A: It is more fun in the game.

Q: Are you gonna do another thread dude? Or have you answered pretty much everything you are willing to?
A: I am getting tired but I want to drive home my point about the CF. I may start another thread.

Q: meme magic is just fucking confirmation bias Well that really takes the wind out of Kek A: Perceptions shape reality.

Q: "If you dig hard into the foundation and make it the sole point of your focus, you will remember this thread when the truth is revealed." any leads on that? or just jewgle? "Not likely to happen. If you remember the post by the red team planner, his analysis was spot-on." It happened in 1933, same time the gold was confiscated. It's why today you see cases like the people of vermont v $10,000. worth a read.
A: Keep pressing for more info on the CF.

Q: Hey as long as you're here, what do you know about Cicada?
A: Cicada is a Pentagon program to induct special minds to work on simulations and strategic planning for their models. A model of the entire world is under development there, several prominent economists have worked on it.

Q: "Sowell has documented that Blacks were actually integrating decently into American society before the welfare state began." I favor repatriation, or the assignment of a state for them. White children need their own countries, just like Asian and Black children have.
A: People can integrate if done in a healthy and constructive way. Not by force.

[He then sent everyone to the second thread.]

Saturday, July 9, 2016

Jon Rappoport - Emails, the Blown Boggle, & Violent Distraction

3 Boggling Facts in Hillary Email Cover-up/Dallas Shooting

TOPICS:CorruptionDallas ShootingFBIHillary ClintonJon Rappoport.

July 9, 2016

hillary email boggling facts

By Jon Rappoport

Arch-Globalist Hillary Clinton’s no-prosecution, the recent exit of Britain from the EU which torpedoed the unchecked advance of Globalism, the current Presidential campaign which features a candidate (formerly two candidates) attacking Globalism as no major candidate ever has before—all this suddenly fades from public consciousness in the specter of the Dallas shootings—the racial conflict that has been decades in the making—made in America, by Globalists, for the express purpose of Divide and Conquer.

I know full well how incompetent, stupid, amateurish, and ill-prepared government employees can be. But the dog and pony Hillary show of the last few days is truly staggering.

If the effort was to exonerate Hillary Clinton, it was done so badly the American people are more certain than ever that she is guilty as sin.

Here are the top three actions of the past few days that conspired to free her, while actually revealing how culpable she is, to anyone with a few working brain cells:

One: Just by chance, US Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, the highest law-enforcement official in the land, runs into Bill Clinton at the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport. They talk in secret, as the FBI is wrapping up its email-scandal probe and is preparing to present its findings. This Lynch-Clinton meeting assures one and all that the fix is in. “Hillary’s guilty, but we’re going to find her innocent.”

Two: In an unprecedented move, FBI Director Comey holds a global press conference. He runs down a massive list of Hillary’s actions, leaving no doubt she is guilty of gross negligence in her handling of classified materials. But then he does an abrupt turn and recommends no prosecution, because the Bureau found no evidence she intended to do harm.

Comey knows, and ensuing press reports emphasize, that intent is not the legal issue. The Federal Penal Code (Title 18, section 793f) makes that clear. Gross negligence is sufficient for prosecution, conviction, and a sentence of up to ten years in prison.

Furthermore, why is an FBI Director making his recommendation in public, before the world? His job is simply to turn over the evidence to his boss, Attorney General Lynch, who will decide whether prosecution is the next step. But since, a day earlier, Lynch inexplicably said she would blindly follow the FBI’s recommendation—thereby abdicating her duty as Attorney General—Comey is suddenly doing her job and occupying her position. He is, for the moment, the US Attorney General.

As any fool can see.

Comey is also an appellate judge, because he is interpreting Title 18 of the Federal Penal Code—and interpreting it falsely.

As any fool can see.

Three: Comey then appears before the Congress for a grilling. Are we to assume he expected to get off easily? Of course not. He knew he would be raked over the coals, and in the process he would reveal more clearly how Hillary had violated the law. Comey would continue to assert there was no need for prosecution, while showing the world that prosecution was exactly the proper path. And that’s what happened, during Comey’s conversation with Rep. Trey Gowdy.

Four main facts emerged out of Comey’s mouth:

1.When Hillary said she didn’t use her personal server to send or receive emails marked “classified,” she lied.

2.When Hillary said she didn’t send classified material, she lied.
3.When Hillary said she used only one device that was connected to her personal server, she lied. She used four.

4.When Hillary said she returned all work-related emails from her personal storage to the State Department, she lied. She didn’t return thousands of emails.

Comey admits all this under questioning. He further concedes that lies of this nature would normally be used to mount a prosecution.

Not only that, these lies would be used to form a circumstantial case for intent, the very issue on which Comey found Hillary “innocent.”

Could Comey, Loretta Lynch, and Obama have figured out a worse way to exonerate Hillary? It’s hard to imagine.

More likely, Obama and Lynch decided to put the egg on Comey’s face. He would have to take one for the team.

Comey, in turn, decided that if he was going to be the fall-guy, he would, in the process, lay out the details showing how guilty Hillary was. After all, his own people, his own FBI investigators, had assembled an air-tight case against Hillary. Comey knew they would boil with rage when he exonerated her. So he threw a bone to his team. In effect, he said to them: “I have to recommend no prosecution, but I’ll expose some of what you discovered.”

The question now is, will one or more of Comey’s FBI investigators leak further devastating facts, revealing Hillary’s guilt, to the press?

By chance, this whole travesty of justice was suddenly overshadowed by the events in Dallas, where snipers shot 12 police officers and killed five.

Arch-Globalist Hillary Clinton’s no-prosecution, the recent exit of Britain from the EU which torpedoed the unchecked advance of Globalism, the current Presidential campaign which features a candidate (formerly two candidates) attacking Globalism as no major candidate ever has before—all this suddenly fades from public consciousness in the specter of the Dallas shootings—the racial conflict that has been decades in the making—made in America, by Globalists, for the express purpose of Divide and Conquer.