Individuals willing to be contacted for information and/or leading groups of activists striving for truth around the crimes of 9-11-2001. To request your name be added to this list, or to change or remove your information, please utilize the Contact form linked at the righthand column.

Sunday, October 4, 2015

THEY Can't Handle the Truth

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization


We lament that the supposedly world-class government supposedly representing most of us willfully misrepresents a plethora of straightforward evidence in order to steadfastly maintain a provably fallacious, purposefully self-serving public narrative purporting to portray both the instances and background of the 9/11/01 crime events. But what we fail to adequately grasp and convey to inform world consciousness is that the U.S. government always misrepresents everything to its perceived advantage without the least regard for the verified truth.

Among prominent current or presently-pertinent examples:

• The U.S. currently complains loudly about Russia’s bombing campaign aimed at disabling ISIS forces in Syria that are (not too) secretly funded by Washington and which the U.S. consistently bad-mouths like crazy but, presumably for that reason, refrains from bombing itself. We (9/11 Truthers and activists) need to spread the word as widely and loudly as possible about this to spark public awareness and demand for truth-telling.
• U.S. government spokespersons continue to pursue the ouster of Syrian President Assad, falsely claiming a) that he gassed his own people (while evidence points to the rebels against him as having done that instead) and b) that Syrians overwhelmingly want him out (while the only polls taken recently indicate that a majority continue to support him). Furthermore, U.S. officials themselves said consistently at least in the recent past that the Syrian people must be free to choose their own leaders.
• U.S. officials continue to blame Russia for shooting down or ordering the shoot-down of the Malaysian airliner from Ukrainian airspace, though the evidence and third-party reports indicate that Ukrainian defense forces were responsible.
• U.S. officials demanded Russia pull back its troops from Ukrainian territory, when even Ukrainian officials declared that no Russian troops were in their territory.
• U.S. officials have insisted consistently that Putin was launching an imperialistic policy of aggression without any credible evidence, while the U.S. and NATO have surrounded Russia with forward bases and engineered through a series of so-called “Color Revolutions” the overthrow, replacement, and reorientation of a number of pro-Russia regimes in former Soviet republics and satellites, including Ukraine.
• Through ultimatums and apparent false-flag operations in Europe, the U.S. has spread fear of war on their turf to exact reluctant policy compliance from Germany, France, and smaller NATO partner nations. The truth, meanwhile, is that the U.S. has not taken on by arms a country anywhere near its size and strength for over 70 years and counting, and is not likely to do so deliberately.

So, 9/11 is not at all exceptional as a duplicitous ploy or instrumentally twisted tale. Indeed, such pop up, accompanied by clanging alarms, whistles, and hand-wringing, every week or two now, and the bullying, shameless perpetrators never fess up, even when everybody knows – which, for the sake of the world, everybody must. That’s where we come in! Pass it on!

JH: 10/4/15

Friday, October 2, 2015

Global Research - The Anti-Russian Lying Machine

The Anti-Russian Lying Machine in Action

By Stephen Lendman
Global Research, October 02, 2015
Region: Middle East & North Africa, Russia and FSU
Theme: Media Disinformation, US NATO War Agenda
In-depth Report: SYRIA: NATO'S NEXT WAR?
print 329 45 1 473
It never rests, now in high gear following Russia’s announced aerial campaign against ISIS in Syria, beginning on September 30.

For the first time since WW II, Russian and US warplanes are bombing the same country – each for entirely different reasons.

Moscow’s campaign aims to defeat ISIS, eliminate its scourge. Washington actively supports it, striking Syrian targets exclusively, duplicitously claiming otherwise.

The US State and Defense Departments’ lying machine has sprung into action, criticizing Moscow instead of praising its efforts, vital against terrorists ravaging Syria.

Defense Secretary Ashton Carter claimed Russian airstrikes are tantamount to “pouring gasoline on the fire.” “By supporting Assad and seemingly taking on everyone who is fighting Assad, you’re taking on the whole rest of the country of Syria,” he blustered.

That is not our position. At least some parts of the anti-Assad opposition belong in the political transition going forward. That’s why the Russian approach is doomed to fail.

Carter and other administration officials fear it may succeed, undermining Washington’s imperial strategy, a long overdue initiative.

John Kerry suggested Russia isn’t fighting ISIS, instead targeting non-existent moderate rebels. Despite Moscow’s request to clear Syrian airspace to avoid any accidental aerial engagements between US and Russian aircraft, Kerry said so-called “coalition” strikes will continue.

America’s declared war on ISIS is a complete fabrication. Russia’s is the real thing – why Obama administration officials are so alarmed about its justifiable intervention, supporting a regional ally in need, complying fully with international law.

A statement from the “Presidency of the Syrian Arab Republic” said “the sending of Russian air forces was carried out upon a request of the Syrian state conveyed via a letter sent by President Bashar al-Assad to President Vladimir Putin.” He got unanimous upper house Federation Council authorization to deploy Russian forces abroad and conduct aerial operations in Syria – in full compliance with international law.

During a Wednesday Security Council session on countering terrorism, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem pointedly said “(t)he UN charter has authorized Security Council the first responsibility for protecting international peace and Security, yet, what has the council done to combat terrorism in Syria and Iraq.”

It’s done nothing to challenge Washington’s war machine with complicit EU and regional partners. It’s financing and arming ISIS as well as other takfiri terrorists, used to “perpetrate the ugliest crimes in Syria and Iraq,” Moallem stressed.

“Those who want to combat terrorism on the Syrian territories should cooperate and coordinate with the Syrian government whose army carries on the war against terrorism and assumes its national duty in defending the Syrian people,” he added.

Sergey Lavrov told reporters: “Do not listen to the Pentagon (propaganda) about Russian (air) strikes. Ask the Russian Defense Ministry.” Full information was made public.

Moscow stepped up to the plate and acted, countering US-sponsored aggression, actively supported by Israel, Britain, France, Canada and Australia, along with Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, other Gulf states and Jordan.

Moallem thanked Vladimir Putin for providing vitally needed help. Whether it’s enough to be a game-changer remains to be seen.

It’s only day two of operations. On day one, Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said: “Today, Russian aerospace force jets delivered pinpoint strikes on eight ISIS terror group targets in Syria. In total, 20 flights were made.”

As a result, arms and fuel depots and military equipment were hit. ISIS coordination centers in the mountains were totally destroyed. Russian jets did not use weapons on civilian infrastructure or in its vicinity.

Strikes followed air surveillance intelligence enabling Russia’s Defense Ministry to choose targets for successfully conducted pinpoint strikes. Areas around Homs and Hama were hit.

Russia’s Defense Ministry categorically denied accusations of causing civilian casualties – fabricated to vilify Moscow’s legitimate attacks on ISIS targets.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said “(i)t’s all an information attack, a war, of which we’ve heard so many times” before.

She expressed surprise about the scale and speed of social media “info injections,” including fake “photos of alleged victims.”

We all know perfectly well how such pictures are made,” she said. Billionaire George Soros is notoriously anti-Russian. His White Helmets group claims phony humanitarian credentials.

It’s an instrument for imperial propaganda – its elements caught red-handed fabricating so-called evidence of Russia’s “disastrous” involvement in Syria.

Its photo of a bleeding girl posted on Twitter was propaganda misinformation – along with saying “Russia strike in Homs today. 33 civilians killed including 3 children and 1 @SyriaCivilDef volunteer.

False!! It never happened. The girl shown was wounded on September 25 – five days before Russia’s air campaign began. No evidence of civilian casualties exists.

The phony Twitter posting appeared hours before Wednesday’s bombing began – reminiscent of the BBC reporting on World Trade Center building 7 collapsing on 9/11 30 minutes before it happened.

The White Helmets (formerly called the Syria Civil Defense) was externally created – serving imperial and monied interests, not the Syrian people as claimed.

It actively backs takfiri terrorist groups, committing horrific atrocities where they’re deployed – part of America’s war OF terror on humanity, a scourge vital to challenge.

The Western media lying machine is in high gear, speaking with one voice, irresponsibly bashing Russia’s campaign to defeat ISIS in Syria – perhaps next in Iraq if its government requests badly needed help.

A typical New York Times propaganda piece headlined “Russians Strike Targets in Syria, but Not ISIS.” The source: US officials, notorious liars.

Other Western media repeated the same Big Lie. The Washington Post called Russia’s campaign “an unpredictable new element…a dramatic escalation of Russia’s military involvement…an affront” to Obama…”sharply increas(ing) tensions…US official dispute Moscow’s claim” about targeting ISIS – despite no evidence disputing Russia’s Defense Ministry account of yesterday’s actions.

The Wall Street Journal headlined “Russian Airstrikes in Syria Targeted CIA-Backed Rebels, US Officials Say.” So-called “rebels” are ISIS and other takfiri terrorists.

No moderate elements exist, at least not enough to matter. US Central Command General Lloyd Austin admitted a $500 million Pentagon program trained only “four or five” so-called “rebels.”

Other US-trained Division 30 fighters reportedly handed their weapons and equipment to al-Nusra terrorists immediately on entering Syria.

Other Western Media Russia bashing included the Chicago Tribune headlining “US warns Russia against striking non-Islamic State groups in Syria.”

The Los Angeles Times headlined “Russia launches airstrikes in Syria amid US concern about targets.”

The UK government’s owned and operated BBC asked whether Russia is “trying to destroy IS or…prop up President Assad? Falsely claiming Wednesday targets struck had “no (IS) presence.”

London’s Guardian highlighted Pentagon propaganda, accusing Russia of “throwing gasoline on the fire…(a strategy) doomed to failure.”

CNN asked “(w)hat are Russia’s intentions. US questions whether Russia is trying to hit ISIS.”

Fox News headlined “CIA-backed rebels, civilians reportedly targeted by Russian airstrikes in Syria.”

Western media reports on all major domestic and geopolitical issues feature all rubbish all the time – an insult to news consumers wanting real information, not state-sponsored propaganda.

Moscow’s involvement in Syria represents the first serious challenge to Washington’s regional hegemonic agenda.

Anti-Russian propaganda doesn’t change facts on the ground. ISIS now faces a formidable adversary. So do lunatics in Washington.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at

His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

Visit his blog site at

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

Copyright © Stephen Lendman, Global Research, 2015

Thursday, September 24, 2015


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization


Why is the world in such sad and alarming shape that dire justified foreboding perennially stalks the face of both sea and land and furrows visibly the collective brow of all humankind, raising our common blood pressure close to bursting? As far back as any of us can remember, people were saying that the world was in a terrible mess, as world wars and depressions came and lingered and ultimately passed and fear and dread abounded. Yet never before so universally existential or seemingly hopeless in tone as to foretell changing the earth itself into another cold and lifeless planet or decaying junkyard: nightmares realized, cockroaches vs. termites for fleeting survival, no memory of bygone days.

How did we ever get in this fix, now that the death squeeze has definitely begun, being it isn’t true that we’ve been quite this woebegone forever? Flash back to the long days of control by the crowned heads of Europe. They, as the absolute rulers and deciders at home, sent galleons over the no-longer limiting seas to seize and subjugate the rest of humankind. And the aristocrats and retainers ran and profited from expanded realms, enslaving at sword- or gun- or pen-point everyone they could find an excuse to – meaning almost everyone at home or abroad.

But then, in strong reaction, such avatars as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau, followed by Madison and Jefferson, promulgated the twin counter-ideas of popular sovereignty and the social contract, enlisting the people always trodden under before as actual sovereigns themselves. The inherent strength at arms of the overwhelming self-willed majority, demonstrated timidly first in the Magna Carta (at least according to some), and more sharply much later in the English Civil War and its counterparts, and in the wars of the Reformation, later still in the American and French revolutions, served to shock the aristocracy of absolutists and liege into a goodly measure of compliance, resulting in milquetoast indirect democracies and a good, if uneven measure of social progress in the west, eventually spreading elsewhere. Hence the future appeared brighter for the exploding ranks of commoners, with scientific advances being applied to the gamut of common betterment. This was in spite of still-foisted major wars and financial convulsions or adjustments that made improvements sporadic even while the masses fervently favored peace and the relative safety of fiscal caution.

But then, starting in a major way (though not very conspicuous at first) about a century and a quarter ago, building on the mind-blowing success of the heirs of start-up banker Amschel Rothschild and their financial protégés at siphoning wealth from the commonplace economy through usury and trickery, a nouveau-riche aristocracy was able to plan and finance an across-the-board retaking of sovereignty from the up-to-then represented masses of citizens. With liquid wealth kept stringently concentrated geographically in the home countries, they easily extended their sway to virtually global scale, steadily capturing control over the national treasuries and, through legalized bribes, making themselves the real constituencies of the government, displacing the citizens by exceedingly clever subterfuge from all real power, and thus sparing themselves from all practical government and restraint.

On 9/11/01, the ascendant usurpers of power effectively cracked the whip on the rest by stupendous deceit accomplished through comprehensive (though imperfect) planning and executed at least in part by the puppet Mossad with full compliance by key parts of the puppet U.S. government, setting the stage of consent for reconfiguring the world strictly to serve their own ends via blunt military force and a regime of frequently-stoked fear and cowed tyranny at home.

And the mechanisms of all kinds they have loosed show signs only of increasingly-tight regulation and suppression of all of us, siphoning our last penny and our last means of self-assertion, ruthlessly culling the increasingly-purposeless herd that is us in their eyes, while reducing our beloved earth to an orbiting clinker. That they can somehow even save themselves now from the merciless forces they’ve cut loose and fought desperately to leave unchecked is doubtful.

High time to be of one mind to reverse their hijacked control and, by all and every means, to contain and restrain them in order to thus regain our once-blossoming self-governance and freedom. Of that, there can be no doubt. This must be our singular and ultimate purpose: to wrest it back! Nothing less will help.


Friday, September 18, 2015

Proof of guilt for 9/11

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

David Ray Griffin - 9/11 and Global Warming

Saturday, September 5, 2015


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.,
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization


Even one wrongful or senseless death – a human life taken or let go – means the obliteration or, at very least, conduction to a different realm of a whole unique universe, a will working through possibly trillions of miraculously coordinated specialized cells and connections. A hecatomb (any word that rhymes with doom, appears to rhyme with bomb, and embodies tomb as well cannot be overly good news) is the sacrifice or slaughter of many victims, including human and too many other kinds for us to be comfortable with.

With regard to hecatombs of human beings – sacred because imbued with life and capacity to experience and, however latent, to reason – I wondered, which are the greatest (that is, most horrific quantitatively) on record? It turns out there is no discernable clear champion reaper among the very many, most but not all of which humans deliberately brought on others.

In my last article, I referred to Chomsky and Vitchek’s statement that 60 million deaths have resulted from U.S. military and CIA interventions since 1945. That's roughly twice the population of Argentina or Canada. Now, I ask you, who knew? If you want to refigure the world, spread the word! Marveling, I wondered, how would this by turns appalling and suitably sterile quantity (for all intents and purposes unimagined of its subject) compare to the stupefying mega-murderous rampages and catastrophes more regularly displayed on that truly awful list, and about which the demigods of U.S. power are not shy?

To address this question, let’s start with our culture’s usual most-demonized gaggle of perpetrators and see how they compare with this proud U.S. record. According to an article by Timothy Snyder, entitled, “Hitler vs. Stalin: Who Killed More?” published in the New York Times on March 10, 2011, the best estimate with reference to Stalin was “tens of millions”, for Hitler, “about 11 millions, … 780,862 [considerably more, if accurate, than were lost in the entire U.S. Civil War] at Treblinka alone.” Pol Pot, the reviled strongman responsible for Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge killing fields in the 1970s, did away with a comparatively trifling 3 million of his own countrymen before committing suicide, a free man, when he learned he was to be extradited to that global bastion of liberality and justice, the U.S., in 1998. (But let’s not forget as well how we Americans speak in awe of losing merely 1/1000 as many of our own to the cowardly false-flag gangsters of 9/11/2001). The infamous Idi Amin killed between 100,000 and 500,000 Ugandans in the 1970s, it turns out, while the fabled Rwandan genocide did away with 500,000 to 1 million in that country during the ‘90s, apparently leading to millions more deaths in continuing trans-border warfare by the same parties in the eastern Congo to this day.

On the list, only WW II (60 – 85 million), the Mongol invasions of medieval times (40 – 60 million), and the Black Death that ravaged Europe in the 1340s (at least 75 million) even begin to measure up to the record of a bit more than two generations (60+ million perpetrated) that U.S. rulers are so uncharacteristically modest about, occasioned in their role of “protecting” the world. Almost incidentally meanwhile, WW I clocked in at 17 million, and the extermination in most quarters wrought by five centuries of European-origin colonization of the Americas has added 50 million and counting to the toll of lives lost. Our incomparably bloody (at least for recognized U.S. wars) Civil War cost us 2% of our population at the time, while England’s largely forgotten seventeenth century civil war took a toll of 14.5% of that country’s then-population, as nearly 50% more lives were, unimaginably, sacrificed for cause than in the classic U.S. internal struggle.

And now, we’ve arrived (in this essay as well as in well-attested reality) at the coming of the “Truly Big One” still in the making, associated with what is generally called the “Sixth Great Extinction”. This foreshadowing reckoning – which would seem to be more linked than not to the true genesis of the taboo U.S. record alluded to above that was rung up cumulatively by U.S. police actions and fearsome security agency plots during the seventy years since 1945 – is now full-bore upon us. If some of the more modest learned estimates by the scientific community of developing untenable climate conditions come to pass, we could literally lose everyone, or within a whisker, in this century. And it more than appears that élite foundations are characteristically funding and fueling both sides of the argument, to make themselves look civic-minded and informed, while imposing a major drag on taking any serious counteraction, regardless what the evidence portends.

So, where does 9/11 stand in the midst of this veritable roiling sea of high-rise hecatombs, past and daunting before us? As James Perloff, the author of Shadows of Power, takes pains to remind in his newer book, Truth Is a Lonely Warrior (2013), “9/11 is just one piece of the puzzle.” Above all, 9/11 provides direct evidence of a more-brazen new species of weapon wielded against us: a false-flag incident in relative peacetime, seemingly deployed on a smaller scale numerous times since in various guises meant to control, steer, and dis- or misinform us, always perpetrated by the same forces that have guided us dragging our heels, usually mounting mass and futile protests at the beginning, into all of our wars for over a century (see Rockefeller Foundation, Nazi eugenics, American eugenics, public relations, global banking, invisible government). These same usually-unseen avatars have likewise plotted for more than a century a precipitous decline in world population, devising and applying all conceivable means in the face of a truly startling unplanned global demographic explosion, at least up to now.

And in so far as their intent, as is yet intermittently stated and inferred, may still be to decimate the inconvenient non-white populations for the perceived benefit and control/spread of the Anglo-American brain trust and its manageable spawn, their overall intent, which now appears likely to succeed, seems to have perversely backfired in its precise outcome – unless … ? (No, don’t forget, there was aids). Because, a mysterious, but almost certainly industry- or environment-related decimation of the sperm count among European-origin males has spelled a beyond alarming drop in human fertility of 1.5% in the U.S. and 3% in Europe and Australia in each year since 1938. (I cite Jim Marrs’s 2015 book Population Control, pages 280-281, and his source, University of Edinburgh professor Richard Sharpe). Now, to me, that spells ‘hecatomb’ well beyond the loss of butterflies and bees – a sort of final hecatomb – like nothing else! In fact, peace-craving democratic (people-based) intervention by the likes of Sharpe is clearly in beyond urgent need now!

As for that saw about “saving the earth” – it will, I believe, go right on spinning in space regardless. And someone might possibly still be home.

JH: 9/5/15

Friday, August 28, 2015


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

* * *

In his 2013 book The Grand Deception, Mujahid Kamran describes some of the workings of what Churchill called the “High Cabal” that, unseen, really controls the world and, in particular, some of the means used historically by one of its affiliates and franchises, the United States of America, the takeover of which began in embryo about a century and a third ago. Dr. Kamran knowingly lauds the American people as overwhelmingly strong preferers of peace, harmony, and tolerance (though the propensity for spontaneous violence in some quarters throughout is fostered by policies instilling domestic resentment and grievance).

“Whenever US governments wish to shove the US into a great war,” Kamran writes, its agencies, through planned efforts arrange for incidents that lead to the loss of innocent American lives [and] resulting anger … diverted against the ‘enemy’.” And he notes that this tried and true practice, not having gone unnoticed, contributed mightily to widespread suspicion regarding the authorship of 9/11. And in addition, I might add, to growing suspicion of any and all violent incidents killing Americans mostly, but not solely – which happen almost every day now – and that the print and electronic press obligingly make their central stories.

To my mind, to say that the hidden powers-that-be have by now overplayed their hand and begun to wear out the deceptive value of this much-used trick, employed lately for all sorts of apparent purposes, would not be an exaggeration. And just as most came to the tardy realization that the carnival magician was insulting people’s intelligence to separate them from the coins in their pockets a century and more ago, fewer are being fooled every day now. As for us, we can only point out the trick when we spot it to all and sundry and strive toward the end that the no-longer-fooled will soon comprise an irate quorum in our society. Encouraging in this regard is the fact that our term “false flag” has recently crept its way into general American and British conversation.

Politically, the controlling élite’s strategy of bankrolling and owning tried and true groomed and initiated secret status-quo, openly change-agent winning candidates, relied on to protect their patrimonial status, has begun to wear through admitting sunlight across the western world. One current harbinger of this is the shockingly successful rousing social democrat Labour Party leadership candidate Jeremy Corbyn in Britain. And then there’s the at least putative Greek rebellion, probably not over yet. Other examples, of course, are Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, surging respectively in defiance of the owned establishment stiffs in the two big parties in the U.S. The story in each case, regardless of precise ideology or program, is the electorate’s brewing disdain for and cold rejection of élite control – of being herded.

But the High Cabal directing the élite we see (even if barely) contemn democratic oppositions as you contemn the stratagems of ants. In ruthlessly forging the world they demand, they will not be mocked, even if by surges among us millions strong. If the wave of rejection rises too high to manipulate or divert aside, they will declare martial law, suspend constitutional documents (“goddam pieces of paper”) outright, and proceed.

According to another salient 2013 book, On Western Terrorism: From Hiroshima to Drone Warfare, by Chomsky and Andre Vitchek, upwards of 60 million deaths have occurred due to U.S. military and CIA interventions since 1945. “Would they really murder three thousand of their own people?” you ask. The next step for controlling élites in the west and China against finally awakened, balking needlessly excess populations to be cut back will be the imposition of the chip Aaron Russo warned us of that they can simply turn off at will. End of story. Please tell me it isn’t so!

The truth matters NOW – now get excited!

JH: 8/28/15