PROS AND CONS OF BEING A 911 TRUTH ACTIVIST

Pros and Cons of Being a 911 Truth Activist

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                  Coordinator,911 Truth Grassroots Organization

_____

     Most activists, one supposes, are impatient by nature, but time-adaptable. The reason they (we) are activists is that they (we) are not satisfied with things as they already are and want to correct the shortcomings and glitches in reality that propel them (us) to activism. We are, most of us here, up the wall unable or unwilling to accommodate ourselves to the 9/11 crimes against humanity and every person and nation remaining not only unsolved, but with no serious attempt ever having been or being made to resolve and exact atonement for them on the part of any of our civil authorities – damn the Constitutional guarantees of due process that we were schooled to expect, take special pride in, and justifiably rely upon.

     And compounding the already much more than sufficient gravamen of our disquiet, we are, most all of us, white-hot perturbed and ceaselessly angered by the steadfastly-maintained web of patent lies and scientifically absurd cover stories and the accompanying incredible psych job that have so effectively lulled and pacified most of the domestic public, turning even most of the smartest, avowedly vigilant into (perhaps cowering or calculating, but certainly complicit) non-activists re both 9/11 and its procedural neglect.  We can count even the usually forge-ahead-regardless ACLU among the AWOL. The official cover story and lies have effectively solicited the vast majority’s silence and compliance even as our mounting trillions in tax dollars and good name have been trashed in fomenting mayhem in the Middle East and a militarized emergent police state at home. And this while the legitimate purposes of government at home as an organizer, arbiter, and abettor of civil society have effectively gone to hell.

     O.K. So, we’re activists about 9/11 to try to rally public support for imposing justice on enormous catalytic crimes that have been used to subvert and defeat the promise and good intent of our world. Accordingly, being justifiably convinced of what we are convinced of, we can all agree we have to do something.

     Since a simple phone call or letter to an authority to start the ball rolling have been more than amply proven in this case to lead nowhere, ever, for any of us, our next logical step is to pick up allies and increase our numbers, by education efforts aimed at our fellow citizens where necessary, to gain numeric and awareness power for effectively exercising our Constitutional right to petition for redress of our grievances.  And, certainly, the steadfast refusal of all Constitutionally-based civil authorities facing us as a mute and immutable stone wall to establish our safety by pursuing the Constitutional mandate of due process in a matter as grievous and consequential as 9/11, is the grievance of grievances of our time, meriting the rapt attention and continual activism of all of us who give a damn.  And no other logical or reasonable inference can be drawn.

     And so, we are right to be activists. More than right, and we should, seeing past our differences, do all that we can, together and separately, rallying in groups to do whatever we cannot do alone, to bring widespread awareness and always nonviolent force to our common endeavor of bringing justice to the still-ongoing crimes of 9/11 and their cover-up.

     But, at what cost? Well, if we choose to be more active, more responsible, as opposed to less, it’s going to claim more of our attention and time. That’s going to expose us to more of the very real public and social consequences, such as possible scorn and ostracism, job loss, severance or straining of relationships we cherish with those who find it immoral, wearying, and even psychologically questionable or objectionable not to just “go along”, but to fight. Probing 9/11 is challenging and exhilarating. It’s a non-stop battle, and it can also lead to new friendships and greater understanding of all that surrounds us. But it is also a wearing and frustrating occupation, testing our resolve. The attributes it calls for are persistence (above all), caring, patience with others, uncompromising honesty and fairness, uncompromised logical thinking, and a measure of selflessness, to let others, their discoveries, and their ideas also receive their due. We all need the capability to encourage, recognize, learn from, and support one another on our common journey. In other words, we are all called upon to be our best selves and an inspiration outward.  That’s what the world needs now. Our route to it, by perseverance, is clear. We need to turn the nation’s thought, as was done to end the Vietnam War. And then, we will win.

Jlh / 5/17

THE NON-MONOPOLY ON TRUTH

The Non-Monopoly on Truth

///

                     by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

*

     The basic nature of 911 (or 9-11, or 9/11) Truth is that none of its claims have been definitively proven, except for one – that the official story or stories of 9/11 are false. If we had tied up what we “know” (or “knew”) leaving out, of course, what were deemed merely scraps of innuendo and baseless trash) five years ago and put a pretty ribbon on it as our movement’s “consensus position”, what would we think of that once new and appealing package by now, its contents somewhat withered and most starting to smell a bit off-putting or at least moldy?

     It seems to me that 911 Truth, or whatever the proper tweakage of the name may be, cannot properly be dubbed a unified “school of thought” at all. Instead, it has always been, and must always be in order to remain alive – a movement – and ultimately productive, a rebellion against authority.

     Stating an opinion, even a wise opinion, that this or that idea or term doesn’t belong, or is mistaken, or not well-founded, is fine and can be enormously helpful. But trying to impose or require or punish miscreants or even bully, is to atempt to impose a new authoritarianism in place of the original “you’re either with us or…” else of the government/corporate establishment we rebelled against in the first place.  But, what about infiltrators (which some see everywhere)?  We’ll beat them ultimately with the truth – with science and logic and unrelenting integrity always. And the truth will out.

     “But, what about the American Revolution?” you might ask. “That was a rebellion, but it still mounted an army and organized a government.” Yes, but it also guaranteed free speech and freedom from authoritarian bullying.

     A bit more-inclusive version of the Toronto Hearings or what could be dubbed “9/11 Congresses” and held in different locations annually, wide-open to all, with sessions and talks on every side and proper debates, could be our own more-open version of a Continental Congress, with a bit more of the flavor of a festival or fair. Not unorganized, but inviting and accommodating and informing all. And maybe such a yearly staged rendezvous could even generate considerably more coverage (say C-Span) than I’ve seen from any of our hugely informative but decidedly more academic conclaves.

     To depict our situation in naturalistic terms -- Instead of being a well-cultivated and well-watered field in proper rows, we exist at present in more of a desert environment, with our relatively-thriving desert cedars and poplars, yes, but probably better characterized by our mesquites, yuccas, and wild sages. All members of this rarefied community stretch our myriad roots far by necessity in common search of the limited sustenance and moisture we are accorded within a hostile and in many ways poisoned environment.  Some of our deep-reaching tendrils yield goodly fruit to our quest and some end in alkali and brine. And sometimes only time and follow-up finds in the future can sort out which are ultimately which.

     Indeed, as we Truthers ourselves loudly proclaim, no one group or source can rightly claim a monopoly on the truth. All of us seek the truth. We all vehemently deny that our government/media has provided it. But, none among us has the whole truth, not even a select umbrella group that “scientifically” admits some and refuses others as too marginal or too “controversial” (as though Galileo wasn’t!) , under the watchful eye of the very highest of the high.  Some not admitted by those will surely be vindicated – just as some acceptable today by whatever council of consensus wouldn’t have been before, or would be by a differently-chosen or -constructed council.

     In fact, any grouping among us can claim, if they so wish, to represent the “position” or “positions” of the movement. But, to reiterate, except when it comes to rejecting the official story as having been proven false on scientific and irrefutable logical grounds, those whose 9/11-related findings fall outside the exclusive umbrella(s) need and deserve to make their voices heard just as boldly and loudly alongside those of the good cabal(s) that inevitably arise to select and set forth the creed and canon of 911 Truth orthodoxy to an eagerly-awaiting world.

Jlh / 5/3/12

Petition

(also on my Wall on Facebook)

Subject: Properly Investigate the Crimes of 9/11

Hi,

Since there's extremely widespread doubt among the general population (from 40% to a majority in national polls) that the real story of 9/11 and who was responsible has been allowed to come out and is not covered up, we demand that a true, open-ended criminal investigation with full subpoena power and access to all evidence be conducted by a universally-acceptable proper court or properly-empanneled grand jury.

That's why I created a petition to The United States House of Representatives, The United States Senate, and President Barack Obama, which says:

"We, the undersigned, demand that a full, unbiased, and open-ended criminal and legal investigation of the 9/11 crimes, with full subpeona power and open access to all evidence, be ordered to be conducted by a properly-authorized court or grand jury for the purposes of determining legally and conclusively from the full evidence who was responsible and the cause of the involved loss of life, property, and subsequent damages and delivering full justice in regular accordance with the Constitutional guarantee of due process and fair trial."

Will you sign this petition? Click here:

http://signon.org/sign/properly-investigate?source=c.em.cp&r_by=2527345

Thanks!

James Hufferd

A RECORD FOR POSTERITY

A RECORD FOR POSTERITY By James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization How It Goes (On a Good Day) This is a record for posterity of a rather typical, every-day encounter between a 9/11 Truth activist and a member of the public, circa 2012. It is not based on any single conversation, but contains common elements of many. “U.S. means us,” he said. “We can’t be bad! We’re the good guys, the exceptional nation!” “Then, what’s good for General Motors is good for us? Like, the bail-out?” “Huh? Hey, you’re confusing me! Now get those filthy DVDs and pamphlets and all that loose-brained talk out of my face and shut the truck up!” “Loose-brained talk? What are you talking about?” “That stuff about letting those rotten Muslims and awful terrorist Osama bin-Laden off from that horrible deed of killing three-thousand Americans, destroying the economy, and freaking everybody out for the last ten going on eleven years! Don’t you know it’s evil to support those guys?” “Well, what if they didn’t do it? What if no Muslims were responsible? “O.K., Loony Toons, then who, in your warped estimation was? Can you tell me that?” “I think it was an inside job, because that’s what the evidence clearly indicates.” “What? You think the president had a button under his desk that he pushed to demolish those buildings?” “Aha! You’ve been watching Chris Matthews! That’s his dismissive line!” The storekeeper blushed a little. “Well, that’s basically what you’re saying, isn’t it?” “Hell, no!” I answered. “Bush was in Florida at the time – as everyone surely knows! And, I doubt he personally knew much about it, really. He probably only knew what the other psychopaths, pit-bull chicken-hawks, originally his sire’s circle, who he encircled himself with, thought it advantageous to fill his head with – whether it was true or not.” “So, you don’t think the president even knew what was going on?” “I doubt they would have him know too much, because I think they knew he wasn’t that great at keeping secrets.” “And so, ‘they’ would be….?” “Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith. All the Vulcans, neocons, PNAC signatories. Or their agents. Bush, Sr., probably. Probably complying with mandates from much higher up.” “Oh! You really are delusional!” “You think so? Then, how would you explain Building 7? It wasn’t even struck by an aircraft.” “Building what?” “Building 7 – the Solomon Brothers Building. A 47-story several blocks from the Twin Towers. It collapsed gracefully, straight down into its own footprint late in the afternoon on that day, directly through the path of most resistance, at near-freefall speed.” Jeepers appears stunned at this revelation. “Well, what did the 9/11 Commission say about it?” he asked. “Although it was a major element, they didn’t even mention it once.” At this, the merchant just stood there behind his counter, trying to think of a rejoinder. I followed up my advantage. “And unignited nanothermite residue was found in abundance – a unique weaponized substance, a super blasting agent developed by the Army and only produced in their labs. It was found in abundance in the dust from all three of the high-rises that collapsed.” “It may surprise you,” he said, “but I do remember reading about that. It’s not what you think it is. In fact, it’s really nothing more than an alloy of melted steel from the buildings and aluminum from the planes.” “And that brings up another problem with the official fairy tale,” I said. “Fires from jet fuel – nothing but kerosene, really – can’t burn a bit more than half hot enough to melt, soften, or liquefy steel, even under optimal conditions, which were not present. Such fires as there briefly were could not possibly have caused those beams to give way, all simultaneously, in order for the buildings to collapse extremely rapidly straight down as they did. No way.” “Even office materials fires?” “Nope. Sorry. No way, Jake. And what we’re talking about with the nanothermite is micro-chips or flakes, like miniscule paint-chips – which very much do not form naturally – and not micro-spheres of molten metal alloyed coming from separate sources.” “But, even if they wanted to,” the storekeeper observed, “the Bush administration wasn’t smart enough to have thought up and executed all of that. In fact, they were barely able to understand what had happened after it happened!” “Of course! They were no more than a vessel for authorizing and, presumably, a resource-provider for putting it all together and carrying it out. Whoever came up with it had the whole government/corporate elite and command structure to draw from in getting it carried out. The security agencies have infamously worked undercover like that for decades.” Jeepers looked glum and thoughtful. “You weren’t even over across the pond fighting the gooks in the day, were you?” he asked out of nowhere. “No,” I admitted. “I didn’t think so.” “Why?” “It raises you consciousness of sneaky, foreign-looking people carrying out something diabolical against us,” he admitted. “Oh! So, first it was the Indians, then the Waps, and the Huns, the Spics, then the Japs and Krauts, Chinks, now…” “Come on! I didn’t mean it like that!” “Well, what did you mean?” “I mean, there were these nineteen, definitely looking around, and spoke of on cell phones…” “Oh, brother! First, there were no actual cell phone calls from altitude. Those have been proven impossible with the equipment. And the only reference to ‘Middle Eastern-looking men’ was a faked cell phone call.” “But, we know they were around, down in Florida and other places. There’s ample proof of that!” “Yes. But not that any were on any airplanes. No surveillance tapes. Nothing.” “I still say…” “Look. Tons of evidence disproves it. The nanothermite. The straight-down, all-too-rapid collapse of the buildings. Building 7. The hole blown in the Pentagon, from the inside out, and no actual, certifiable plane wreckage. No wreckage in that little crater near Shanksville, where they said, but debris from something scattered across six or eight miles nearby…” “And, what would that ‘something’ be?” “I think all of them – all four main, associated aircraft – were remotely-guided military drones or missiles. But, that’s just my educated surmise.” “A little too-educated. Then, what did they do with the passengers on the flights scheduled that day?” “Well, it’s been established, I think, that at least two or three of the supposed airline flights weren’t even scheduled for that day. The flight manifests issued by the airlines afterward were all curiously lacking for customers – a curiously low percentage of the seats taken. And the lists issued changed from day to day. And few if any credible family members of the plane passengers have come forward, in stark contrast to the relatives of people who perished in the buildings. The anomalies just go on and on. And also, there’s lots of evidence proving that insiders knew in advance it was going to happen.” “I don’t want to believe what you’re saying.” He stood rigid, chin-forward. “ I am not convinced.” “You’d rather live with lies and falsehoods setting the agenda for your country, and the world? And let heartless mass-killers go free, to strike again? To continue to rule?” “I don’t know. I still think you guys… And, how would they keep it covered up for all these years?” “Oh, they have their ways. And, they’ve had the media, from the first, all buffaloed and in their pocket, too. The Manhattan Project was kept secret for years – so secret that Harry Truman had never heard of it until he became president!” Jeepers stopped and thought. “So, what does it even really matter, now? There are so many more-pressing problems.” “Well, again, who do you want to run your country going forward? Is this to be the land where murderers and traitors walk?” Jeepers looked serious now. “Well, are there other explanations?” “Could be.” “I’ll think about it,” he finally said. I scrawled something on a piece of paper I had in my pocket. “Here’s some web sites,” I said, handing it to him. “And, pass it on.”

A PRELIMINARY IMPERATIVE -- UNANIMITY ON CLAIMS & CONTROVERSIES

A Preliminary Imperative--
Unanimity on Claims & Controversies
by James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization
Our unanimity on some points is essential to our success.
9/11 – a tragedy blotted from view by searing pain and comprised of – no, shattered by – so many details that it’s an impossibility to define, to describe, to solve, to credibly attribute, except by gut instinct. So, folks went along with the narrative presented as reportage, and reinforced over and over and over for years, until they were both inured to and sick of hearing about it. Part of the evidence, they’d seen with their own eyes – the plane slamming, improbably, into the building. That had to have had consequences. You can’t tell me, they would genuflect, that an airliner flying hundreds of miles per hour straight into the side of a building – say, my house – won’t catastrophically affect it, even if it’s a steel building. We know what we know.
And then, along comes Mr. Science and says it couldn’t have happened – it being the collapse(s) – couldn’t have happened just from that. Don’t bother me with the “facts”, the people would say, that contradict everything we know and, even more incredibly, implicate our government. Our government, we are told, is us! So, don’t point your grimy finger at us – at me! Hell no, it’s got to be people who are different – that hate us for being different. They must have done it. So, don’t give me that g.d. evidence baloney! What’s that you say? Do you want me to lose my job? To fully convince people I’m crazy and not to be trusted?
As all of us know, meanwhile, our nation is demonstrably subjected daily to mass mind-control and hour-to-hour conditioning by tamed and managed news outlets which saturate, which surround. So, in light of that, how do we who doggedly apply science to seeming minutia of events and investigate glaring contradictions and anomalies back to their sources, convince our fellows to unite to throw off the deliberate bondage and reclaim rationality? By informing everywhere, everywhere, everywhere!
But, before we can succeed (as I believe we can), we have to agree among ourselves to abide by a few important principles:
1. First, we must each agree not to become too invested in our own honest conclusions. If I have spent thousands of hours over several years carefully investigating some aspect and concluded I understand that terrain perfectly and can explain everything about it, and someone comes along and disproves that with genuine evidence I overlooked or didn’t have, the new conclusion will most likely be valid, regardless of my protestations to the contrary.
2. We must agree to argue only logically applying facts, completely avoiding off-putting bombast and invective.
3. We must agree not to demonize fellow discussants, nor to accuse of being an infiltrator or agent, unless we can provide proof or probable cause. We might need to appreciate and work sometimes with people we are not necessarily fond of personally.
4. We must remember that our available evidence is incomplete, and therefore admit the possibility of valid hypotheses besides our own.
5. We must recall that today’s heresy in the 911 Truth Movement could very well become tomorrow’s conventional wisdom, and remember that it’s happened before.
6. We must bear in mind that the most important thing is to unite around our shared conviction that the perpetrators of 9/11 are not those officially accused and scapegoated, and that the true perpetrators are egregious criminals who must be brought to full justice and not tolerated.
7. To ultimately win, we need to not lose heart.

JH : 3/14/12

WHAT IS THE SECRET? IS THERE A WAY?

WHAT IS THE SECRET? IS THERE A WAY?
by James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization
In order to win – to bring about a serious, satisfyingly probing reevaluation of 9/11 on behalf of a demanding public that insists upon knowing and acting on its revelations to achieve justice – we must, fairly obviously, change or move the culture.
In other words, we must alter the common understanding, the conventional wisdom, before we can succeed at what we’re really longing for and trying to do. Short of that, our best efforts will most assuredly be swept away by the masters of mass manipulation and propaganda over us all, who invent the narrative of every succeeding day to advance their own purposes.
The bad news is that we’re not nearly there yet, despite the wishes of all of us, and despite our raising a tempest in our own tea pot. The good news is that successive polls, bolstered by our sustained efforts and the erosion of public confidence in our prowess and probity as a nation-state, show that we’re getting closer to the threshold of our very own views and remedy fermenting the host culture as a whole.
So, what would it take, in terms of a change in the public mood for our desire to win out? Well, the Vietnam War was finally halted when the anti-war movement jumped from being a containable nuisance mainly on some college campuses, and eventually in shocking speeches by a couple of rogues branded as crazies in Congress, to becoming a general contagion, a consuming nationwide wildfire of conviction whipped by a sudden wind of rage to engulf and disable the war machine literally in its tracks. What we will need to succeed is to foment not merely a general sentiment that, “Well, why not? Another look at it won’t hurt,” but a driven and driving conviction like that in the end over Vietnam, a dug-in conviction that will not settle for anything short of the bona fide real thing – the whole truth and (though delayed) real justice. We must produce, by being and staying resolute, by doubling down on our efforts at mass information regarding the overwhelming evidence and the focused question itself THAT sort of a profound change in the prevailing American and international culture.
So, is there anything else we can do to ramp up the time table, besides talking to more people and distributing more DVDs and pamphlets, writing more letters, etc.? Actually, maybe there are ways we can play smarter. Perhaps, we need to ask ourselves, for instance, what is it that convinces me that we are right? How do we know that 9/11 was an inside job, an enormously covered-up false-flag operation perpetrated by agents representing the terminally self-centered corporate + government establishment?
I would guess that we’d all find that our particular conviction, still so obnoxious to so many others and the powers-that-be, is fueled by just a handful of all-but-still images permanently seared into our brains. 1. Building 7, sparkling with explosives, slumping straight down in one movement into its own footprint. 2. The 16’ (or 18’) round initial hole in the Pentagon wall, compared to an at least 125’-wide 757 aircraft and no real airplane wreckage present. 3. The shallow crater near Shanksville, only a bit larger than the dimensions of my cozy little sunroom, completely devoid of wreckage. 4. The dancing Israelis, or whatever. 5. Name your favorite. Any of those iconic images alone could be enough to convince someone, or disturb them enough to compel them to check further. If they were exposed.
I receive daily and have for some time (and, probably, you do, too) a mysterious email entitled Le son de satellite (espace), which I never subscribed to. I’ve seen complaints about it on the Internet, because there seems to be nothing anyone can do about it. (And I don’t even read French). But, obviously, it can’t be too terribly expensive to flood the Internet with such. And, a couple of years ago, it was a pet pedicure device being ubiquitously marketed.
So, what I’m thinking is that some larger segment of the hydra-headed entity that is 911 Truth, having superior technical means available, could probably flood the Internet likewise, sending little 8 or 10-second videos of Building 7 going down, or sometimes stills of other iconic 9/11 images, with just a line or two of incisive commentary and perhaps a web site link or two or three, to untold millions of ordinary operating systems subscribers. And, thus, we could implant easily-deletable but never forgettable convincing images in the minds of millions more random earth residents, thereby moving the needle of knowledge significantly and perhaps provoking discussion. And, conceivably, those images would be forwarded on, at our suggestion, to inspire untold millions of others, many of whom we would never otherwise reach. And, if the emailings were repeated daily, even the hard core resisters would eventually be tempted to at least take a look.
Consider this a subtle suggestion, AE911truth. It’s worth your consideration, for all of us!
And what about political help sometime for at least bringing about a public vote to authorize a winning true investigation? Is that notion really as dead as it’s usually portrayed? Not if we’re really and sufficiently changing the culture it’s not! Because, politicians are fungible, meaning that they tend to support whoever and whatever is providing their job security. (Once, it was slavery). And, in the meantime, few politicians will commit political suicide, regardless of what they know. Would you? Now, it’s clearly the support system of the official narrative (active also in other contexts, of course) that is funding and keeping them in there. But, when we sufficiently change the culture and stir up an uncontainable counter-demand for truth and justice, the controlling, winning, and sustaining narrative will be ours – just like 1974!
JH / 2/28/12

Toward a Truth Spring

Toward a Truth Spring
by James Hufferd, Ph.D. Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization
However legitimate it may have been at the beginning (uncertain), the Arab Spring was fairly quickly hijacked by the western powers and diverted to serve their interests – this time without having necessarily to resort to western invasion, which the people at home have temporarily soured on.
A tip-off is that western invasions to topple and control don’t happen, regardless of real suffering, unless there is either oil (Iraq, Libya, possibly Iran) or an overwhelming strategic objective – which there often is. If the disturbances occur within Israel or Saudi Arabia, they are not even deemed newsworthy. But, Russia would be a good candidate. And Syria either has a homicidal mad dog who is suicidal for a ruler, or the stories of butchery of innocents are either essentially made up or limitlessly exaggerated. Logically, the latter is more likely.
And, my rule regarding the U.S. and western mainstream press, which seems to hold up well, is that every word is a lie. It’s all tailor-made in the two both (literally!) Rothschild-owned wire-service news works to serve the programs of the greater world empire’s rulers. There’s nothing revolutionary about it. And, if there ever is, it won’t make TV.
All that the world needs to snap back into recognizable non-nightmarish shape is the whole truth and nothing but. That’s adherence to evidence, unflinching honesty, respect for our intelligence.
I’m convinced that most people are neither homicidal monsters nor security freaks demanding abandonment of human decency by gangs of trained killers and sycophantic thugs ripping countries and lives apart on their behalf. And, let it be known, more Americans and Western Europeans probably die slipping on banana peels than from radical terrorists in any given year. (Which isn’t construed as an excuse for invading and destroying banana-growing countries) .
And, likewise, most Americans don’t value cunning, rapaciousness, and deceit (the values increasingly rewarded by our economy) above trustworthiness, honor, and generosity (values increasingly scorned and trashed thereby). And most Americans, in my estimation, are not stupid, as often said. Instead, they are cunningly mass-brainwashed and duped. It isn’t that our oppressors generally force us. It’s more that many of us are, in effect, hypnotized into simply letting then walk over us, in effect using us, without our opposition.
But – and I say this again – in good part due to our own efforts to spread the truth and kindle doubt about 9/11, the great and key con job of our age, the tide is slowly turning our way. Because, who else is insisting on the evidence, on the radical truth narrative that we are insisting upon? Indeed, who else, if not us, has, while being systematically reviled for it, pointed to facts and consistently dispelled myths that were (and still are) keeping people from seeing what was real, while pressing firmly to change the outcome? Don’t look down now, but we are winning. Changing poll results show it. (For instance, see -http://growingentityofrighteousness.blogspot.com/2012/02/accepting-911-truth-is-so-4-seconds-ago.html).
And, when politicians begin to sound too stupid to too many in parroting the official line, they’ll adopt our line, uncontrollably. And the wall of ice will thaw and spring will come.
Simply continue to circulate the (evidentiary) truth, as non-dramatic as that may sound, and just you wait and see. Nothing is more revolutionary and destructive of deceit!
JH / 2/11/12